Login

russian armor

Cruzz's The More You Know

PAGES (58)down
6 Jan 2018, 19:17 PM
#1001
avatar of Stug life

Posts: 4474



Where can I find that collision hit in the mod tools?

If that's correct, aren't the armored troops even more in a disadvantage? After all the armour modifier only gets used if they are hit.
no cause they roll only once while recived accuracy roll twice
6 Jan 2018, 21:08 PM
#1002
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1



Where can I find that collision hit in the mod tools?

If that's correct, aren't the armored troops even more in a disadvantage? After all the armour modifier only gets used if they are hit.

No.
Think of your example. The unit with smaller size depends on missed shots to survive but with the "re-roll" every shot missed gets another chance to do damage.

The unit with armor get hit more often and gets penetrate only some times, but because it get hits more there are less "re-rolls".

This effect explains the power of kubel/SP since all weapon "re-roll"
6 Jan 2018, 21:19 PM
#1003
avatar of RedT3rror

Posts: 747 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post6 Jan 2018, 21:08 PMVipper

No.
Think of your example. The unit with smaller size depend on the shot missed to survive but with the "re-roll" every shot missed get another chance, the unit with armor get hit more often but get damage only some times so there are less "re-rolls".


I believe we are wrong about that focus_fire thing. focus_fire is a feature of burst weapons. In the documentation it says:
if true:
this setting is only valid if can burst is true.

focus all the hit check on the primary target, Instead of randomly pick from the scatter area


From my understanding there are no "re-rolls" - the target chosen for a "hit check" is chosen among the entities within the scatter radius (including the "primary target", which is the center of that circle)

That's kinda logical since you don't want burst weapons to annihilate squad members one by one.
The Obersoldaten MG34 has it set on true, explaining why they are so good in killing models.
6 Jan 2018, 21:24 PM
#1004
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1


I believe we are wrong about that focus_fire thing.

If in doubt I suggest you test it in game.

Create a game in cheat mode and have a kubel firing on squad. Then check if the damage spread to more than one entity.

Then repeat with a single PG entity instead of kubel.
6 Jan 2018, 21:48 PM
#1005
avatar of RedT3rror

Posts: 747 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post6 Jan 2018, 21:24 PMVipper

If in doubt I suggest you test it in game.

Create a game in cheat mode and have a kubel firing on squad. Then check if the damage spread to more than one entity.

Then repeat with a single PG entity instead of kubel.


Obersoldaten are a good example. They use focus fire with the MG34 resulting in 1 model taking all the damage whereas a Kübelwagen distributes the damage among the units in the scatter circle.

I find the whole "re-roll" idea quite absurd.
6 Jan 2018, 22:28 PM
#1006
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1



Obersoldaten are a good example. They use focus fire with the MG34 resulting in 1 model taking all the damage whereas a Kübelwagen distributes the damage among the units in the scatter circle.

I find the whole "re-roll" idea quite absurd.

So your test confirmed that it works as described.

It should be removed from some weapon like the bar, for other I am not sure since having more models firing on the same entity seems to be big advantage for squad with more entities.
6 Jan 2018, 23:49 PM
#1007
avatar of Tobis
Senior Strategist Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 2307 | Subs: 4



Obersoldaten are a good example. They use focus fire with the MG34 resulting in 1 model taking all the damage whereas a Kübelwagen distributes the damage among the units in the scatter circle.

I find the whole "re-roll" idea quite absurd.

From my understanding there are no "re-rolls" - the target chosen for a "hit check" is chosen among the entities within the scatter radius (including the "primary target", which is the center of that circle)

I was under the impression that no focus fire does the re-roll once on misses, not that it will randomly aim at any unit in the squad first. Possibly test with kubel vs soviet sniper team? If it does re-rolls then the model it targets should usually die first, if it doesn't either model has equal chance to die first.

My experience in game tells me the targeted model dies first a majority of the time. Look at this video that was in trending recently, the targeted sniper squad takes 2x the damage that the other squad takes. With re-rolls working the targeted entity should always take more hits than the others. Example with 30% accuracy:
3 outcomes
Model 1: 30% hit 70% miss
Model 2: 30% * 70% = 21% hit 79% miss
Nothing: 70% * 70% = 49% both miss







That's kinda logical since you don't want burst weapons to annihilate squad members one by one.
The Obersoldaten MG34 has it set on true, explaining why they are so good in killing models.

No focus fire is just a straight up buff to the weapon, literally an extra accuracy roll. Obers without focus fire would be even more deadly.
7 Jan 2018, 08:41 AM
#1008
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post6 Jan 2018, 23:49 PMTobis


I was under the impression that no focus fire does the re-roll once on misses, not that it will randomly aim at any unit in the squad first. Possibly test with kubel vs soviet sniper team? If it does re-rolls then the model it targets should usually die first, if it doesn't either model has equal chance to die first.

My experience in game tells me the targeted model dies first a majority of the time. Look at this video that was in trending recently, the targeted sniper squad takes 2x the damage that the other squad takes. With re-rolls working the targeted entity should always take more hits than the others. Example with 30% accuracy:
3 outcomes
Model 1: 30% hit 70% miss
Model 2: 30% * 70% = 21% hit 79% miss
Nothing: 70% * 70% = 49% both miss




No focus fire is just a straight up buff to the weapon, literally an extra accuracy roll. Obers without focus fire would be even more deadly.

It is highly probable that "reroll" does not happen for every single shot missed or that it fired with accuracy penalties, else these weapon would have around double the DPS calculated.

That would explain the effect you describe.
7 Jan 2018, 09:50 AM
#1009
avatar of LiberalPerturabo

Posts: 26

Hello again.
I'm having a bit of trouble with the vehicle crit system in this game. I know that AT nades and fausts will always damage engine after a certain damage threshold (?) + specific abilities will score their own specific crits. But there are things like main gun destroyed and abandoned vehicle which I can't figure out. Are those absolutely random and can be caused by anything, or is there more to them?
7 Jan 2018, 10:49 AM
#1010
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

Hello again.
I'm having a bit of trouble with the vehicle crit system in this game. I know that AT nades and fausts will always damage engine after a certain damage threshold (?) + specific abilities will score their own specific crits. But there are things like main gun destroyed and abandoned vehicle which I can't figure out. Are those absolutely random and can be caused by anything, or is there more to them?


Snare will cause engine damage if the vehicle is below 75% HP.

Shots can cause "main gun disable" bellow 25% HP.

Certain weapons and abilities can cause a number criticals effects.
7 Jan 2018, 17:53 PM
#1011
avatar of Tobis
Senior Strategist Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 2307 | Subs: 4

Hello again.
I'm having a bit of trouble with the vehicle crit system in this game. I know that AT nades and fausts will always damage engine after a certain damage threshold (?) + specific abilities will score their own specific crits. But there are things like main gun destroyed and abandoned vehicle which I can't figure out. Are those absolutely random and can be caused by anything, or is there more to them?

Abandon is completely random, iirc a 5% chance on death.
7 Jan 2018, 19:02 PM
#1012
avatar of LiberalPerturabo

Posts: 26

Ok, thanks again.
9 Jan 2018, 13:54 PM
#1013
avatar of RedT3rror

Posts: 747 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post7 Jan 2018, 08:41 AMVipper

*snip*


jump backJump back to quoted post6 Jan 2018, 23:49 PMTobis

*snip*


I did a test with the BAR. Set damage to 1, burst to 10000 rounds, accuracy to 50% on all ranges, got a target with 1 target size and 10000hp, made sure no vet is applied.

A single burst round left the target with ~50%.
Then I used to 2 targets, standing next to each other. This time a single burst would not drop the hp by 50%, instead it lost about ~31% while the other model, which was not targeted, lost about ~18%.

The myth of "re-rolls" is hereby debunked. Therefor guns with focus_fire enabled are superiour.[edited] The primary target however will be prioritized by weapons without focus_fire. By which modifiers the secondary targets are selected I can't say for sure - not of my interest though.
9 Jan 2018, 14:39 PM
#1014
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1





I did a test with the BAR. Set damage to 1, burst to 10000 rounds, accuracy to 50% on all ranges, got a target with 1 target size and 10000hp, made sure no vet is applied.

A single burst round left the target with ~50%.
Then I used to 2 targets, standing next to each other. This time a single burst would not drop the hp by 50%, instead it lost about ~31% while the other model, which was not targeted, lost about ~18%.

The myth of "re-rolls" is hereby debunked. Therefor guns with focus_fire enabled are superiour. The primary target however will be prioritized by weapons without focus_fire. By which modifiers the secondary targets are selected I can't say for sure - not of my interest though.

Thanks for testing and sharing the result.

Not sure I agree with conclusion thou, for 1% difference. You are not taking into consideration the affect it creates when more entities are involved or when you firing at very high accuracy or the affect of other factors like aoe weapons grenades, flamer and...
9 Jan 2018, 14:54 PM
#1015
avatar of Mr.Smith

Posts: 2636 | Subs: 17


I did a test with the BAR. Set damage to 1, burst to 10000 rounds, accuracy to 50% on all ranges, got a target with 1 target size and 10000hp, made sure no vet is applied.

A single burst round left the target with ~50%.
Then I used to 2 targets, standing next to each other. This time a single burst would not drop the hp by 50%, instead it lost about ~31% while the other model, which was not targeted, lost about ~18%.

The myth of "re-rolls" is hereby debunked. Therefor guns with focus_fire enabled are superiour. The primary target however will be prioritized by weapons without focus_fire. By which modifiers the secondary targets are selected I can't say for sure - not of my interest though.


Could you repeat the same experiment with 5 targets on the same location? I'd be interested to know of the result.

I've only tested this in the past with two PGren squads, one with focus fire set to on, and one with set to off, and the squad with focus fire set to off was winning by a large margin, when it was squad vs squad.

Conversely, when it was 1 model vs 1 model, I didn't notice any difference.

Your testbed is much better than the one I used, so it would be interesting to get hold of more data to know about how this works precisely.

PS: make sure you remove all other variables from your testing; e.g., min-max cooldown, burst, etc etc. The only thing left at random should be accuracy.

Alternatively, if you can't be bothered, let your guys fire for 20 seconds at a time and post the results. Bursts can be variable.
9 Jan 2018, 15:06 PM
#1016
avatar of RedT3rror

Posts: 747 | Subs: 2


I've only tested this in the past with two PGren squads, one with focus fire set to on, and one with set to off, and the squad with focus fire set to off was winning by a large margin, when it was squad vs squad.

Conversely, when it was 1 model vs 1 model, I didn't notice any difference.

Your testbed is much better than the one I used, so it would be interesting to get hold of more data to know about how this works precisely.


jump backJump back to quoted post9 Jan 2018, 14:39 PMVipper

Not sure I agree with conclusion thou, for 1% difference. You are not taking into consideration the affect it creates when more entities are involved or when you firing at very high accuracy or the affect of other factors like aoe weapons grenades, flamer and...


Well, I admit my general statement about focus_fire being better was a bold one. I was solely thinking about the typical setup of 1 LMG doing the damage (MG42, MG34, Browning) and also ignored the possibility of several equally good weapons engaging different targets. That would explain why PG perform better.
9 Jan 2018, 15:18 PM
#1017
avatar of Mr.Smith

Posts: 2636 | Subs: 17





Well, I admit my general statement about focus_fire being better was a bold one. I was solely thinking about the typical setup of 1 LMG doing the damage (MG42, MG34, Browning) and also ignored the possibility of several equally good weapons engaging different targets. That would explain why PG perform better.


Could you test it out, regardless?

We don't know how focus fire works precisely, anyway. The reroll-on-miss is the most plausible theory, but a theory nonetheless.

Maybe additional targets generate more opportunity. Maybe in the testbed you used you didn't remove variable effects (e.g., variable burst due to range, or variable min/max values).
9 Jan 2018, 15:30 PM
#1018
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1


Well, I admit my general statement about focus_fire being better was a bold one.

Based on you experiment is 2 2 men squad fight each and only squad A has 1 weapon that rerols and each entity engage different enemy entities squad A will probably win because they will drop the enemy model faster.


....
We don't know how focus fire works precisely, anyway. The reroll-on-miss is the most plausible theory, but a theory nonetheless.
...

Maybe ask Relic?

Maybe remove it from weapon that are HMG and be done with it?
9 Jan 2018, 15:56 PM
#1019
avatar of RedT3rror

Posts: 747 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post9 Jan 2018, 15:30 PMVipper

Maybe remove it from weapon that are HMG and be done with it?


I don't want to hear "re-roll" ever again!
Nothing! Nichts! Nada! Niente! Rien!

All you have is 1 roll wether you hit the primary target or someone else within a small radius. Each possiblity has a different probability with the primary target having the highest.
9 Jan 2018, 16:01 PM
#1020
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1



I don't want to hear "re-roll" ever again!
Nothing! Nichts! Nada! Niente! Rien!

All you have is 1 roll wether you hit the primary target or someone else within a small radius. Each possiblity has a different probability with the primary target having the highest.
find another name for it then :)

How about "spread damage"
PAGES (58)down
0 user is browsing this thread:

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

636 users are online: 636 guests
1 post in the last 24h
4 posts in the last week
24 posts in the last month
Registered members: 48743
Welcome our newest member, kubetdlsite
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM