i like going rifle 3x > grenade > rifle > captain > stuart. if ur rifle control sucks youre gonna be in for a bad time.
This is what we need more of, new strats for a new meta.
Instead of my rifle blob, can't blob, nerf MG.
Ostheer HMG too strong now
25 Jun 2015, 22:42 PM
#141
Posts: 824
This is what we need more of, new strats for a new meta.
Instead of my rifle blob, can't blob, nerf MG.
Youtube Streaming: https://www.youtube.com/@broodwarjc1517/streams
25 Jun 2015, 22:57 PM
#142
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
The DhsK is the maxims big brother, same arc and set up time but much higher damage, penetration, and suppression.
Also gets the large arc when garrisoned.
25 Jun 2015, 23:06 PM
#143
Posts: 162
I don't understand why the MG42 got a buff when it was alrady 3 times better than the maxim? For the same price, where is the logic in that?
25 Jun 2015, 23:18 PM
#144
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
I don't understand why the MG42 got a buff when it was alrady 3 times better than the maxim? For the same price, where is the logic in that?
The logic (as dumb as it is) is Relic didn't release all the changes.
25 Jun 2015, 23:54 PM
#146
Posts: 269 | Subs: 1
That was in response to my complaint that HMG's can suppress squads in green cover.
Thats not blobbing...
its normal need longer but can suppress after a short time
26 Jun 2015, 00:20 AM
#147
Posts: 80 | Subs: 1
[Post #145 Invised for spam/trolling ]
26 Jun 2015, 01:19 AM
#148
Posts: 622
Osteer HMG42 is just right atm for me, i don't have to retreat it when there is 2 sq, or retreat it and its spotter when there is 3 sqs of USF rifles. however i think HMG34 is still kind weak, it cost same is HMG42 and it is call in. i thought call ins should be stronger with same price or at least equal performance
26 Jun 2015, 01:24 AM
#149
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently Bannedhowever i think HMG34 is still kind weak, it cost same is HMG42 and it is call in. i thought call ins should be stronger with same price or at least equal performance
LOL
MG34 is 210
mg45 is 240
There is no recording in all WW2 history of a piat actually knocking off a vehicle. Yes, it was THAT bad.
26 Jun 2015, 02:18 AM
#150
Posts: 107
In some cases I agree, HMG42 is so powerfull against squads in green coveralthough the biggest problem I find is when you are playing as USF in some maps, it so painfull to counter.
+That, i had only played axis since the patch.
you need to have a 1 squad advantage and a molotov / nade to counter mg. if equal skill more or less, that's feeling ok to me.
Problem is green cover do not protect from mg suppression in long ranges, that does not feel right and renders green cover almost useless against well positioned ost play, combine it with grens rifle nade and you have a recipe for long range squad wiping.
i think mg could use some damage buff in close range to further devalue head on charge and some debuff to suppression in long range
26 Jun 2015, 03:47 AM
#151
Posts: 622
LOL
MG34 is 210
mg45 is 240
is it 210? i thought 240... oh well
26 Jun 2015, 03:57 AM
#152
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently Banned
is it 210? i thought 240... oh well
unless It was ninja patched. I could be wrong...
There is no recording in all WW2 history of a piat actually knocking off a vehicle. Yes, it was THAT bad.
26 Jun 2015, 04:45 AM
#153
Posts: 600
today after like 8 games my rank droped twofold.
Main isuue that aliies dont have a blob counters. Its crazy OKw main stat is to blob with like 3-6 squads. And if opened with t1 (no mortar) nothing you do
Allies have plenty of blob counters mid-late game.
Christ even the AT gun can fire a HE barrage...
26 Jun 2015, 05:54 AM
#154
1 Posts: 440
But maxim is a ww1 machinegun and is supposed to be badTo compensate Relic gave you a big crew.
26 Jun 2015, 05:55 AM
#155
Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1
today after like 8 games my rank droped twofold.
Main isuue that aliies dont have a blob counters. Its crazy OKw main stat is to blob with like 3-6 squads. And if opened with t1 (no mortar) nothing you do
Ok I got it.
No go and cry to your mama that you lost your noob rank.
BeefSurge wrote:
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
A lot of people have an image of how they want a faction to play, leading to problems. This is why you have people complaining about lack of Soviet bunkers, why T34/76 sucks, why Cons don't scale, Grens don't get normal grenades, Muricans don't get heavy tank, OKW laser weapons and Die Glock Death Bell, etc.
26 Jun 2015, 05:56 AM
#156
1 Posts: 440
The DHsK can suppress a squad a lot faster than the MG42 can and has a faster swivel time. If you have good micro a DHsK is better than an MG42, if you have shit micro the DHsK is worse.
And why need it? Idk it hard counters OKW starts by having good performance versus OKW's higher model count squads and having the ability to cause serious harm to light vehicles.
You do know that its really hard to believe anything you say, right?
26 Jun 2015, 06:10 AM
#157
Posts: 1930
But maxim is a ww1 machinegun and is supposed to be bad
age alone doesn't make a weapon obsolete. Firearm technology didn't advance that quickly.
The .50cal and mg42 are still being used in modern day armies, and I dare you to say they are bad.
26 Jun 2015, 06:13 AM
#158
3 
Posts: 587
im pretty sure that Dshk has a larger firing arc than maxim, atleast it feels that way, maybe its just its ability to suppress instantly
The DhsK is the maxims big brother, same arc and set up time but much higher damage, penetration, and suppression.
Also gets the large arc when garrisoned.
26 Jun 2015, 06:31 AM
#159
Posts: 656
The suppressing units in green cover thing is what really gets me. You can build sandbags or get behind a nice brick wall but it doesn't mean a thing if an MG is in range. I would like to see green cover counter suppression once again so that squads fighting behind green cover can stand a chance when an MG is around.
One other consideration is that with suppression what it is now perhaps MGs in general should cost more than the 240 MP standard infantry do. That way you have fewer but more potent MGs on the field and as a result MG positioning and micro is more important.
One other consideration is that with suppression what it is now perhaps MGs in general should cost more than the 240 MP standard infantry do. That way you have fewer but more potent MGs on the field and as a result MG positioning and micro is more important.
26 Jun 2015, 06:36 AM
#160
Posts: 1891
Allies have better blob counter than Axis. Demo Charge, HMC, .50 Cal, Katushya.
The Fascisti Will Pay.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
126 | ||
 |
|
|
51 | ||
|
|
|
|
6 | ||
 |
|
|
164 | ||
|
|
|
|
24 | ||
|
|
|
|
20 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.611220.735+5
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1110614.644+11
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1236
Board Info
774 users are online:
1 member and 773 guests
aerafield
aerafield
0 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
7 posts in the last week
34 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49120
Welcome our newest member, truvioll94
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, truvioll94
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM