PTRS now OP?

Jump back to quoted post5 Apr 2015, 19:41 PMvoltardark

I suggest you try to win some 3vs3 or 4vs4 using those allies commanders (PTRS users) after that we could have a talk. PTRS are better now, but not op at all.

Jump back to quoted post6 Apr 2015, 11:54 AMAladdin

Calm down dude! They do, and I am talking about fresh vet 0 guys.

The problem is their ptrs works similar to snipers and ur obers start to get low health and models quickly. Not sure if u really tested it but I certainly did and still
Have the videos. I even recorded the videos of the scenario to send to the game developers about how they messed the game. Take it easy

Jump back to quoted post6 Apr 2015, 13:01 PMJohnnyB

...which... is wrong in my opinion and exactly this is the problem. It needs to be more effective against vehicles, not infantry. And such a change (penetration buff) won't make guards crapy again. It will just improve their performances against vehicles and even medium tanks which will be ok and needed. Let's put it this way: how would you feel about changing schrecks in the same manner? To be quite good vs infantry?

Jump back to quoted post15 Apr 2015, 12:42 PMilGetUSomDay

The conscript PTRS buff was a consistency consequence. They did not look far enough into the game to see how a lot of cheap squads wielding the buffed weapon could turn out be broken.

Jump back to quoted post15 Apr 2015, 07:46 AMStonethecrow01

What your describing assumes there is no counter system. MGs should counter Cons. 4 cons with the PTRS upgrade can walk up and snipe an mg now. That shouldn't be the case.

Just to be clear, are you saying that there is no problem balance wise with mass PTRS upgrades on conscripts??

Jump back to quoted post15 Apr 2015, 13:15 PMGrumpy

It's a little broken, but not any worse than dozens of other inane things in this game, like:

IR halftracks being able to see through buildings
PAK 43 being able to shoot through buildings
Soviets suffering casualties during the winter, but cold immunity to western front Germans
Luftwaffe pummeling US ground troops, instead of vice-versa
OKW being able to salvage Soviet weapons, but not vice versa
The disparity in being able to destroy crew weapons by using attack ground (a volks blob of the same size would kill the mg also, then either salvage the weapon, take it, or destroy it with attack ground, two more options than the cons get)
M10 crush (an open top TD would normally stay away from infantry)
lazer guided AT nades from Soviets and shreks from OKS or Ost
hand-held AT having nearly the same range as the main guns of battle tanks
etc, etc

Jump back to quoted post15 Apr 2015, 13:47 PMmeh

You are like the first person I have EVER seen complain about Salvage in terms of Allies having that ability. In COH1/COH2 I don't recall ever seeing someone say Allies need/should have Salvage ability. It's almost comical... LOL....

Jump back to quoted post15 Apr 2015, 13:11 PMvoltardark

Bla bla bla...in 4vs4 or 3vs3, they are just fine.

#adapt.

Jump back to quoted post15 Apr 2015, 14:35 PMThunderhun

Ignorance is worse than stupidity.

Look at the whole game, not just a part of it.

Jump back to quoted post15 Apr 2015, 15:00 PMQueenRatchet123

Can i make this my signature? good sir?

Jump back to quoted post15 Apr 2015, 19:12 PMelchino7

I still wonder why i've still to see someone use con spam with PTRS yet.
Is not like i would had been defeated by regular con spam if that would be the case.

Jump back to quoted post15 Apr 2015, 14:35 PMThunderhun

Ignorance is worse than stupidity.

Look at the whole game, not just a part of it.

Jump back to quoted post15 Apr 2015, 14:07 PMKatitof

He isn't complaining, he points out how retarded argument about PTRS destroying weapon is in reality.