Frontal blob assault on HMG should never be able to succeed, period.
Then Maxims are going to need pretty major buffs.
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
Frontal blob assault on HMG should never be able to succeed, period.
Posts: 57
FFS, stop using this 960MP and 200MU bullshit theory at COH, it can be applied in other RTS but not COH.
You use 4000 MP of Ober cannot kill a single T70.
Frontal blob assault on HMG should never be able to succeed, period.
Posts: 300
FFS, stop using this 960MP and 200MU bullshit theory at COH, it can be applied in other RTS but not COH.
You use 4000 MP of Ober cannot kill a single T70.
Frontal blob assault on HMG should never be able to succeed, period.
Posts: 627
FFS, stop using this 960MP and 200MU bullshit theory at COH, it can be applied in other RTS but not COH.
You use 4000 MP of Ober cannot kill a single T70.
Frontal blob assault on HMG should never be able to succeed, period.
4 lmg grens won't also destroy any team weapon, yet the ptrs does? It's a dedicated anti tank weapon. With this patch the purpose completely changed.
Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2
Posts: 1484
So, pre-patch:
Guards are worthless outside sniper builds and people are happy when they drop PTRS
Tank Hunter is a gimmick commander that no one takes seriously, and everyone complains that Commanders without Call-In tanks are worthless
Post-Patch:
People are actually happy to use Guards again, they aren't a 4 man squad when fighting infantry any more
Tank Hunters is actually useful for once (despite the fact that it doesn't have a heavy call in tank - hey! I guess call in meta got addressed!)
Sorry, a unit that was extinct before now gets used.
And it is in a niche (long range SOV infantry) - that didn't really exist before
As such it is way too early to make any judgement if it is OP or not because people have no experience of how to deal with it.
Posts: 2779
Posts: 30
A few teamgame and 1v1 experience of this Cons blob of doomed, these are my feeling.
They wtfpwn everyone walking with legs, even Obers, IRSTG or LMG34, doesn't matter.
They can frontally assault MG42, and even destroy the gun.
Pak? Rakenten? Just die.
Luch? lol
Medium tank like P4? Ohwaa, AT nade, and MOAR AT nade, and bambambam PTRS, bye P4.
Any OKW truck? Call bombing run, and 3 secs of shot bring it down.
Anyone said it is not OP are ignorant, or trolling, or stupid, or both.
Posts: 593
Posts: 36
Posts: 658
+1
Also, this new commander gives us a bit more diversity for Soviets as well. I am tired of seeing Shocks into IS2s every game now. People wanted diversity and now they have it.
Posts: 1283 | Subs: 4
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
I don't think I can deal with 6 more months of this.
To everyone who laughed at Alex when he suggested that buffing PTRS guards would mean they'd just roam around a map rofl buttoning everything-- oh the unforeseen horror.
Posts: 2779
I don't think I can deal with 6 more months of this.
To everyone who laughed at Alex when he suggested that buffing PTRS guards would mean they'd just roam around a map rofl buttoning everything-- oh the unforeseen horror.
Posts: 551
LOL, I proved it myself.
4 PTRS cons blob head on into MG42, they are suppressed of course, but MG42 destroyed in 5 seconds.
Trolololol Lelic
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Replay?
Posts: 551
I don't think I can deal with 6 more months of this.
To everyone who laughed at Alex when he suggested that buffing PTRS guards would mean they'd just roam around a map rofl buttoning everything-- oh the unforeseen horror.
Posts: 2779
Replay?
Posts: 1283 | Subs: 4
27 | |||||
122 | |||||
39 | |||||
20 | |||||
11 | |||||
4 | |||||
3 | |||||
1 |