Profile of Mack674

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 30

General Information


Thread: What I don't like in OKW18 Apr 2015, 00:34 AM I meant like, the doctrine call in at 11 command points you can call in a tiger or IS2 etc. for 800 manpower or whatever it is. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: What I don't like in OKW18 Apr 2015, 00:06 AM Game is super unrealistic in almost every way outside of graphics and sound effects so Im not going to bother arguing semantics anymore, it hurts my head. I still love the game, i just find it immensely frustrating. I can't speak to anything bigger than 2v2 games though. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: What I don't like in OKW18 Apr 2015, 00:05 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Apr 2015, 23:55 PMVuther I agree, Tigers should have a 50% chance of not arriving due to having been rendered combat unready before the battle for whatever reason. Tigers' rear armour already bounces a third of all shells from mediums in the positioning of being driven right into their assholes, while each penetrating shot certainly isn't highly likely to render the tank inoperable, mind telling me what its game-y drawback should be for such a game-y strength? What? I don't think I've ever once seen a Tiger1 bounce a shell off the rear, but anyway - Tiger2s were the ones late to the party, Tiger1 was in service since 1942. It should just have the same drawbacks as it did - the Soviets defeated them in mass numbers and closing the distance. Tiger 1 was meant to fight from a long distance, not so much point blank, because they're massive and slow. The game doesn't do them justice, a Tiger1 was much, much larger than a Sherman. Really I think infantry should have alot more AT weapons than they do but whatever. You know what, I don't even care. Theres so much I disagree with how this game works I can't change one thing without changing everything. I enjoy playing it, it just irritates me that it's "gamey". I liked MenOfWar2 better, but it wasn't nearly as polished and slick as CoH is. TL;DR, if you're going to force the OKW to save up all game for one tank, it had better be good. After patch, it's not much better than an IS2 which is a manpower call in at 11CP. I don't like the call in system for heavy weapons. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: What I don't like in OKW17 Apr 2015, 23:45 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Apr 2015, 21:36 PMsome one 1) All units after upgrade may retreat to FHQ. Poor design gives advatage on big maps. I don't mind about healing. 2) Schwerer panzer building still shoting at the planes. (Get AA halftrack for that as all other factions). 3) Schwerer panzer building shoots very far and secures territory for huge amount of time (untile tanks arrive). 4) Sturmpios repair vehicals very fast 5) Volksgrens has increased vision with = poor design. 6) Jagdpanzer has rotates fast sees far moves fast = poor design ( no need support) that's it other stuff is ok for me now As for this, L2P. 1 - all units retreat to forward HQ is often a disadvantage if you can pin them in and it also costs 300mp, it's not automatic. 2 - they hardly ever shoot down planes anyway 3 - if your opponent is dumb enough to put it in the open, blast away at it with an AT gun for 30 seconds or blow it up with mortars/arty like everyone else does. 4 - no, not really 5 - volks aren't very good unless veterans 6 - what ? This thing gets killed super easy and does not rotate fast at all, it has no turret and has to physically re position the whole vehicle to fire... standing head to head and trying to fight it out with an anti tank weapon is.. not smart ? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: What I don't like in OKW17 Apr 2015, 23:41 PM What I dont like is how much the KT was nerfed, and how the Tiger and KT aren't anywhere near as powerful as they were in reality - but relic just succumbed to all the whining and nerfed everything because players are too lazy to do anything but frontal attacks. I could barely win at a .510% pre patch, and its mostly the same post patch but I find with the OKW especially it takes alot more effort than the other factions to succeed and is almost completely merciless if you make a mistake or lose a unit. You just don't have the fuel to replace any vehicles - you lose one, it's a serious loss. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: British Faction, what do you want to see?9 Apr 2015, 17:57 PM "Lots of xxx is OP!" And "xxx NEEDS buff!! Axis tanks too OP!!" Threads In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Bugsplat crash4 Apr 2015, 21:55 PM Hmm mine happens sometimes when loading the game, loading a match or most often randomly it CTD in the middle of a match. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Bugsplat crash4 Apr 2015, 20:18 PM Does anyone else get the bugsplat crash semi-often? It happens to me at least once or twice a day, usually when im winning a match, much to my chagrin, since it counts as a D/C loss. thanks In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Why am I horrible ?4 Apr 2015, 17:30 PM Thanks for the replies guys, thats what bothers me about it being average - I play this way too often and I am very competitive lol The win% doesn't bother me so much, I'm just trying to climb the ladder a bit. I have played games as every faction, I originally played mostly Allies but I mostly just play Axis now. In: Strategy Desk
Thread: Why am I horrible ?4 Apr 2015, 07:36 AM Seriously, 500 hours on this game , I still can't crack the top 1500-2000 players 1v1. Axis player. After this last patch its even worse with the PTRS crazyness.... I either win embarassingly the other player is so bad, or im crushed very badly but something stupid like maxim spam or conscript spam or whatever. Sigh. If I take dianabol and winstrol, will my wrists get stronger and help me click commands faster? Not troll topic. My win % are .500, .525 at the best of times. In: Strategy Desk