This was another smart change.
The SU had no long range unit. And also when your opponent goes with tuards, he won't have IS2 and won't be able to rain down fire on your paks. Thank god.
PTRS now OP?
2 Apr 2015, 01:19 AM
#61
Posts: 270
I'll try again.
The source of my frustrations that should be removed
2 Apr 2015, 01:22 AM
#62
Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2
Wait for my Custom Commander
Guards
Repair Station
Recon
IS2
Bomb Strike
Guards
Repair Station
Recon
IS2
Bomb Strike
Resident Soviet Whiner and Grand Master Bias Jedi; General Secretary of the Soviet Whine Hydra Collective; Axis Hating Sheeple; Allied Butt Buddy! Collect Them All!
Also the African Branch of TAB Bulletins
PS: The Italian Army fought with courage and skill
Also the African Branch of TAB Bulletins
PS: The Italian Army fought with courage and skill
2 Apr 2015, 01:24 AM
#63
Posts: 7
Just adjust priority, so PTRS would target the crew first, not weapon itself
2 Apr 2015, 01:24 AM
#64
1 
Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15
Testing this...ive found Con blobs can do this consistently even if the weapon is in a building.
3+ Con squads were suppressed firing at MG42 in building and destroyed the gun and killed the whole crew in the building. How does stuff like this get past testing? Or do they test at all?
3+ Con squads were suppressed firing at MG42 in building and destroyed the gun and killed the whole crew in the building. How does stuff like this get past testing? Or do they test at all?
2 Apr 2015, 01:39 AM
#65
Posts: 37
Yes, the thread only about CONS PTRS Tank Hunter Doctrin which is op like hell.Most allied fanboys that want not be Touched their guards, cant read and Spam some Shit in here.
Learn read guys, Learn read..
And Why move this thread to Lobby, is this a Joke?
Learn read guys, Learn read..
And Why move this thread to Lobby, is this a Joke?
2 Apr 2015, 01:39 AM
#66
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
Testing this...ive found Con blobs can do this consistently even if the weapon is in a building.
3+ Con squads were suppressed firing at MG42 in building and destroyed the gun and killed the whole crew in the building. How does stuff like this get past testing? Or do they test at all?
Oh man... So this confirms it? Can we call PTRS game breaking? Gotta make a video and send it to relic. Seriously, the management should consider warning the QA team or something. They are damaging Relic's already "not so well" reputation.
Things like this, or other bugs on maps (units get stuck, salvagable wrecks etc) can be identified in 2 or 3 games, maybe even less.
2 Apr 2015, 02:55 AM
#67
1 Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15
Oh man... So this confirms it? Can we call PTRS game breaking? Gotta make a video and send it to relic. Seriously, the management should consider warning the QA team or something. They are damaging Relic's already "not so well" reputation.
Things like this, or other bugs on maps (units get stuck, salvagable wrecks etc) can be identified in 2 or 3 games, maybe even less.
It took one 5 minute session for me to figure this out. Pathetic tbh
2 Apr 2015, 03:19 AM
#68
Posts: 270
They are busy on something else. Not hard to understand eh?
I'll try again.
The source of my frustrations that should be removed
2 Apr 2015, 03:39 AM
#69
Posts: 1248
Kappa Kappa Kappa
2 Apr 2015, 04:02 AM
#70
Posts: 157
color me surprised.
i didnt know that conscript PTRS are on the same level as guards PTRS. Didnt Relic implement some kind of accuracy modifier penalty for pickup weapons based on the cost of the infantry.
conscript ppsh /= shocks ppsh
i didnt know that conscript PTRS are on the same level as guards PTRS. Didnt Relic implement some kind of accuracy modifier penalty for pickup weapons based on the cost of the infantry.
conscript ppsh /= shocks ppsh
2 Apr 2015, 04:21 AM
#71
Posts: 1216
I didn't know SVTs were mid-range. However, Guards being long-range only brings up the question of why they have frag grenades...and Button being very short in range.
SVTs would make no sense. DPs are long range, mosins are long range, PTRSs are at least theoretically long range, why would you put mid-short range rifle into it?
2 Apr 2015, 04:55 AM
#72
Posts: 353
color me surprised.
i didnt know that conscript PTRS are on the same level as guards PTRS. Didnt Relic implement some kind of accuracy modifier penalty for pickup weapons based on the cost of the infantry.
conscript ppsh /= shocks ppsh
conscript ppsh and shock ppsh not same weapon data (Shock better than con )
-------------
PTRS problem for set weapon data is it pick-up weapon
2 choice for suggestion
1 incense upgrade cost form 50 mun to more and up guards Troops mp cost too
2 build another ptrs weapon stats like LMG weapon function when pick by Paratroops or ober
2 Apr 2015, 05:29 AM
#73
Posts: 118
The ptrs are so good I actually pick them up from the ground now. 
 | Playercard of Juggernauth | |||||||||||||||
|
2 Apr 2015, 06:02 AM
#74
Posts: 170
PTRS are just decent now. I think this patch has improved balance quite a lot.
Before patch nobody would use guard commanders anymore and now soviets actually have 1 long range unit that can actually do some decent dps. Besides that they still die relatively easy and have the nasty ability to clump up really close making them very vulnerable to all types of indirect fire and grenades.
Concerning the conscripts with PTRS I can imagine them being a little OP but it is just one niche commander. I didn't face enough yet to really see the consequences.
I also really like the small leIG and pack howitzer buffs providing some suppression.
Before patch nobody would use guard commanders anymore and now soviets actually have 1 long range unit that can actually do some decent dps. Besides that they still die relatively easy and have the nasty ability to clump up really close making them very vulnerable to all types of indirect fire and grenades.
Concerning the conscripts with PTRS I can imagine them being a little OP but it is just one niche commander. I didn't face enough yet to really see the consequences.
I also really like the small leIG and pack howitzer buffs providing some suppression.
2 Apr 2015, 09:18 AM
#75
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
And all they had to do was give Guards SVTs.
Which would fix nothing as PTRS would still be shit.
But hey, I have great idea for fixing shrecks!
Lets give volks G43s!
So, that helps how again?
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
2 Apr 2015, 09:42 AM
#76
Posts: 1216
If it's Guards that's the problem then that helps. If PTRS was the problem, then Relic should have said it's for PTRS, not Guards. And PTRS is for what exactly? Super rifles or AT Rifles?
Which would fix nothing as PTRS would still be shit.
But hey, I have great idea for fixing shrecks!
Lets give volks G43s!
So, that helps how again?
2 Apr 2015, 09:55 AM
#77
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
PTRS is right now 50AI/50AT what is kinda good since it's shit AT.
Guards are fine. Problem are Cons. They should not have same accuracy like Guards.
PTRS, like other AT rifles, is highly presicion weapon with great velocity so it's quite useful in taking down soldiers. Although, like I said, cons with PTRS should be much weaker than Guards.
Guards are fine. Problem are Cons. They should not have same accuracy like Guards.
PTRS, like other AT rifles, is highly presicion weapon with great velocity so it's quite useful in taking down soldiers. Although, like I said, cons with PTRS should be much weaker than Guards.
2 Apr 2015, 10:13 AM
#78
1 
Posts: 2885
I didn't know SVTs were mid-range. However, Guards being long-range only brings up the question of why they have frag grenades...and Button being very short in range.
Guards have granades for exact same reason volks have grenades: to defend against close range squads. And as for button the ability would be OP if it was long range, also it's kind of realistic as they have to aim peep holes of tank that are small, its impossible on close range. And if you remember bren troops from vcoh brits they also were long range lmg squad and their button was also quite short in range.
2 Apr 2015, 10:15 AM
#79
3 
Posts: 658
Which would fix nothing as PTRS would still be shit.
But hey, I have great idea for fixing shrecks!
Lets give volks G43s!
So, that helps how again?
That would actually fix quite much.
Give Volks Pzfauts and an AI upgrade instead of shrecks and you wouldn't need call-in inf or Obers all the time you want some AI in form of infantry.
Shrecks could then be given to Sturms.
2 Apr 2015, 10:31 AM
#80
Posts: 353
PTRS is right now 50AI/50AT what is kinda good since it's shit AT.
Guards are fine. Problem are Cons. They should not have same accuracy like Guards.
PTRS, like other AT rifles, is highly presicion weapon with great velocity so it's quite useful in taking down soldiers. Although, like I said, cons with PTRS should be much weaker than Guards.
it mean other commander if conscripts pick-up PTRS form falling guard acc stats will same conscript in Tank hunter commander ?
increase upgrade cost will be better way?
0 user is browsing this thread:
Livestreams
 |
|
|
34 | ||
|
|
|
|
28 | ||
|
|
|
|
9 | ||
 |
|
|
155 | ||
|
|
|
|
20 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1101614.642+2
- 5.305114.728+1
- 6.916405.693-2
- 7.271108.715+22
- 8.721440.621+3
- 9.1041674.607-2
- 10.17146.788+1
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1231
Board Info
833 users are online:
833 guests
1 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
38 posts in the last month
8 posts in the last week
38 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49082
Welcome our newest member, 23winlocker
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, 23winlocker
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM