It denies cap off mechanizm which is main feature of CoH2.
Defending cap points with defenses is a main feature of CoH2.
Schwerer so broken, will it be fixed in the upcoming patch?
16 Mar 2015, 22:46 PM
#241
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Defending cap points with defenses is a main feature of CoH2.
16 Mar 2015, 23:04 PM
#242
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Wires, bunkers, flaks, sangbags... Not buildings.
And how excatly you know which mode is my favourite?
16 Mar 2015, 23:18 PM
#244
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Wires, bunkers, flaks, sangbags... Not buildings.
And how excatly you know which mode is my favourite?
So the Schwer isn't a flak cannon? And bunkers/FP's/ect are all buildings. They don't take damage from small arms fire but they have 0 armor and thus any explosive/AP weapon does full damage to them.
16 Mar 2015, 23:20 PM
#245
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
So the Schwer isn't a flak cannon? And bunkers/FP's/ect are all buildings. They don't take damage from small arms fire but they have 0 armor and thus any explosive/AP weapon does full damage to them.
It's a building to make troops with flak cannon, not flak cannon with ability to make a troops.
They are defensive budilings with that purpose.
Schwerer purpose is to make units.
I'm gonna stop here. No need to repeat what Ive said already.
16 Mar 2015, 23:21 PM
#246
Posts: 521
So the Schwer isn't a flak cannon?
It is. It shouldn't be.
Find out about my redesign of all four factions, with more to come!
Feel free to contact me regarding your Attribute Editor-related questions.
Feel free to contact me regarding your Attribute Editor-related questions.
16 Mar 2015, 23:21 PM
#247
Posts: 2779
It's a building to make troops with flak cannon, not flak cannon with ability to make a troops.
They are defensive budilings with that purpose.
Schwerer purpose is to make units.
I'm gonna stop here. No need to repeat what Ive said already.
Defence doctrine give MG42 to base buildings in vCOH, so why not both? And why can't be both?
Bunker can MAKE a goliath, SPAWN some zombie Gren, and shred the fuck out of incoming Rifles.
You just MAKE an assumption, they can't be both.
I just answer, why not?
God forbid that in Bible?
16 Mar 2015, 23:30 PM
#248
Posts: 531
remember when i made a thread about this, like a week ago
16 Mar 2015, 23:32 PM
#249
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
It's a building to make troops with flak cannon, not flak cannon with ability to make a troops.
They are defensive budilings with that purpose.
Schwerer purpose is to make units.
I'm gonna stop here. No need to repeat what Ive said already.
The Schwer has multiple rolls because all the WFA factions get bonus's with teching. So if you want to remove the Schwer and make it a base building your going to need to get rid of the major.
What exactly do you not understand about the whole idea of a building that can defend itself; if bunkers cost 80 fuel and made your most important units you would want them to not die to a passing breeze and maybe be able to hold off a small push.
16 Mar 2015, 23:58 PM
#253
10 
Posts: 4785 | Subs: 3
Invised some posts! Keep personal discussion in the PMs but not here!
16 Mar 2015, 23:58 PM
#254
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
The Schwer has multiple rolls because all the WFA factions get bonus's with teching. So if you want to remove the Schwer and make it a base building your going to need to get rid of the major.
What exactly do you not understand about the whole idea of a building that can defend itself; if bunkers cost 80 fuel and made your most important units you would want them to not die to a passing breeze and maybe be able to hold off a small push.
Of course, Major is obvious advantage when playing agasint OST.
All faction should have forward retreat point or none of the factions, that's quite simple.
Good MG postion and suppressing whole blob be rewarded. For USF and OKW this is not true. They have reatreat point a way closer than Sov or Ost.
If bunkers costs 80 fuel and I make it offensive, I know I can lost it very easily but none bunker can deny everything around, no matter if it is infantry or tank.
But if that bunker makes important units, I don't make it offensive, but when I do, it should be easily punished and while with soviets it is true (T70+ZiS, mortar, 120, SU85 etc.) for USF is not that easy.
17 Mar 2015, 03:31 AM
#255
Posts: 738
Relic buffed the Flak post WFA release, it's anything but a hold out. It's in there to provide a defensive option to a faction that lacks any kind of build-able non doctrinal MG/Emplacement. Furthermore as much as it pains me to say it, but I think all five pages of Australian Magic's relentless Autism are in vain and the truck will remain untouched next patch.
17 Mar 2015, 08:47 AM
#256
Posts: 721
And like I said before, you are OKW hero, not CoH2 objective player. You have around 50-60 games as USF and hundreds as OKW so how can yoy make objective statement? You can't.
50-60 games is still a resonable amount of games for having an opinion though. One doesn't become all-knowing in that amount of games but anybody should have a decent understanding of the faction by then. Just saying, not into the actual argument at hand.
My mommy always said there were no monsters - no real ones - but there are.
17 Mar 2015, 08:47 AM
#257
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
Relic buffed the Flak post WFA release, it's anything but a hold out. It's in there to provide a defensive option to a faction that lacks any kind of build-able non doctrinal MG/Emplacement. Furthermore as much as it pains me to say it, but I think all five pages of Australian Magic's relentless Autism are in vain and the truck will remain untouched next patch.
OKW does not have any defensive, nondoc options? My dear... Okw has best non doc structures.
And with fortification you have everything. Amazing wires, flak,mines, bunker, smine,sandbags. What else do you need?
17 Mar 2015, 09:25 AM
#258
Posts: 2779
OKW does not have any defensive, nondoc options? My dear... Okw has best non doc structures.
And with fortification you have everything. Amazing wires, flak,mines, bunker, smine,sandbags. What else do you need?
I suggest you actually build that Flak emplacement and see how
Amazing it is, and tell us again.
17 Mar 2015, 09:59 AM
#259
Posts: 959
I suggest you actually build that Flak emplacement and see how
Yes, as "Amazing" as the Mg34! kappa!
17 Mar 2015, 10:06 AM
#260
Posts: 209
This is going nowhere.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
63 | ||
|
|
|
|
10 | ||
 |
|
|
130 | ||
 |
|
|
32 | ||
|
|
|
|
15 | ||
 |
|
|
14 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.940410.696+6
- 4.35459.857-1
- 5.599234.719+7
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.10629.785+7
- 10.527.881+18
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
11
Download
1265