222
Stats
Thats not really the take away, since again the 222 also has a cannon. M20 doesnt. The 222 statisticly is a better anti infantry vehicle than the M20. Way better.
I dont know the stats or the math behind the cannon's damage but the Cannon isnt awful against infantry at close range. maybe at longer ranges... but at close range the cannon is nasty from my own ostheer experience.
Ill say it again. The Early Problem with Ostheer is not their units or equipment. They dont need outright buffs. .
The problem is the game mechanics regarding blobs,and their teching which prevents them from fielding ENOUGH combat capable units. Not that their units arent combat capable on their own. The MG42 is great when you have enough grens to support it or a sniper to spot/support for it. or better yet BOTH. Or even better,a mortar on top of all of that!
However having 2-3 grens,MG,Sniper,Mortar+Med bunker against USF is just begging to get
'
by an M20 or worse an AA Halftrack before you get to the good stuff. So fix the tech costs...and theres no problem.
speaking of the good stuff
P4 vs jackson...The problem isnt the P4. its the jackson doing 240 damage. It needs to do 160-200 with a higher pen and lower ROF.
Tiger vs jackson..if you ost players feel the jackson is a problem for your tigers,even in the current meta right now,learn to micro a PaK. a jackson cant hit your tiger without taking a hit from a pak(Or two)
P4 vs Easy 8 and T3485,Support the P4 with Paks,which isnt very fun or practical all the time ill admit that, so again the tech problem comes up..since these are call ins..again not a problem with the Ostheer, a problem with game mechanics..
You cant get a better medium that can counter these allied beasts because the panther is essentially locked because of tech costs. Fix that...and there is no problem. the P4 doesnt need a buff either...