Login

russian armor

SU 76 spam

20 Oct 2014, 15:34 PM
#1
avatar of Trilob4yt

Posts: 2

20 Oct 2014, 16:05 PM
#2
avatar of Bersercker

Posts: 14

Didn't watch, but i find su-76 spam viable only if soviet player has serious fuel advantage.
20 Oct 2014, 16:05 PM
#3
avatar of dasheepeh

Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1

Classic l2p issue.
20 Oct 2014, 16:28 PM
#4
avatar of Crysack

Posts: 70

Well, I'll give it to the guy, he was dedicated to his Su-76s. Watching that Tiger get swarmed by seven Su-76s is easily one of the funniest things I've seen in CoH2.
20 Oct 2014, 16:32 PM
#5
avatar of CptEend
Patrion 14

Posts: 369

Lol, the SU76 is probably the most useless unit in the game. You lost to a complete lack of coordination. At some point in the game there were at least 2 Tigers and 2 Panthers, and he had 6 SU76s. Those SU76s wouldnt have stood a chance if you used all of your your tanks at the same time (although 2 Panthers would have probably been enough).
20 Oct 2014, 16:48 PM
#6
avatar of elchino7
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

Su76 nerf incoming.
20 Oct 2014, 16:59 PM
#7
avatar of UGBEAR

Posts: 954

Congrats, you have been pwned by the most useless unit which soviet could offer.
20 Oct 2014, 17:03 PM
#8
avatar of Thunderhun

Posts: 1617

jump backJump back to quoted post20 Oct 2014, 16:59 PMUGBEAR
Congrats, you have been pwned by the most useless unit which soviet could offer.


Khmmm....M5 spam yet to come
20 Oct 2014, 17:32 PM
#9
avatar of newvan

Posts: 354

Such an epic fail, lose by axis in 4*4, its already hard enough, but for what... for SU 76 spam, LOL.
20 Oct 2014, 17:35 PM
#11
avatar of Bersercker

Posts: 14

They aren't that bad, in numbers they have very high squad wipe potential, don't have to come into at gun, faust and shreck range to rape infantry (so they are only endangered by tanks and td's), and also are quite adequate against p4's and pumas. Mark target, mines and guards button are a must have with this strat ofc. Cover them with a zis late game and they can defend against panthers and tigers too. I liked them much more when they had 55 fuel cost though...
20 Oct 2014, 19:03 PM
#12
avatar of y3ivan

Posts: 157

I got to say its the worst humiliating defeat ever.
20 Oct 2014, 20:02 PM
#13
avatar of QueenRatchet123

Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2

Permanently Banned
l2p
20 Oct 2014, 20:14 PM
#14
avatar of MarcoRossolini

Posts: 1042

I've had some successes with SU-76M spams of 3 units or so. But their weaknesses outweigh their strengths by a long shot.
20 Oct 2014, 20:29 PM
#15
avatar of MajorBloodnok
Admin Red  Badge
Patrion 314

Posts: 10665 | Subs: 9

If a poster asks for help, please post helpfully. This is not an e-peen thread in excelsis. One post invised. Thanks guys:)
20 Oct 2014, 21:26 PM
#16
avatar of JimmyC7A1

Posts: 94

Can't you just rush them with heavy tanks? They are a terrible unit. What about those heavy stuka strafes, do they do any damage to armour? (the 37mm)
20 Oct 2014, 21:34 PM
#17
avatar of braciszek

Posts: 2053

I had an Ostheer teammate who was somehow struggling with them. I came with my panther and destroyed 3, and left with little damage inflicted. The panther does the job easy.
20 Oct 2014, 22:43 PM
#18
avatar of beemer8

Posts: 104

as long as there no mines ;)
21 Oct 2014, 00:41 AM
#19
avatar of pigsoup
Patrion 14

Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2

I've had some successes with SU-76M spams of 3 units or so. But their weaknesses outweigh their strengths by a long shot.


this. they have abysmal penetration with whopping 120 damage. on top of that, have 320hp, two shot kill, amount of health. only thing it has going for is 60 range and he barrage.

also the complete lack of turret makes chasing hard if the opponent tank makes turns. the su76 has to chase, turn, chase turn.
21 Oct 2014, 16:39 PM
#20
avatar of Bersercker

Posts: 14

jump backJump back to quoted post21 Oct 2014, 00:41 AMpigsoup

they have abysmal penetration with whopping 120 damage.

They have very good rate of fire though, about twice that of t34-76, about 20% better than shtug. And their penetration is also about the same as t34-76, 20 less than shtug. Not that bad imo.

P.S. Decided to compare their effectiveness against tiger to t34.
So dps per fuel for su-76 against tiger's front at max distance:
(90/300)*(120/3.4)/70=0.151
Now dps per fuel for t34-76 against tiger's rear point blank
(120/180)*(160/6.2)/100=0.172

Didn't account for aim time, post firing aim time etc, cause i don't know how they work but i think it shouldn't change much. So su-76 are definitely not that bad even against tigers. :)
(stats for coh2 stats)
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

778 users are online: 778 guests
2 posts in the last 24h
10 posts in the last week
29 posts in the last month
Registered members: 50048
Welcome our newest member, 8kbetycom
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM