Profile of Crysack

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 70

General Information


Thread: Double the weapons, double the fun27 Nov 2015, 01:55 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Nov 2015, 01:44 AMSpaceHamster Doesn't the heavy engineer armor buff stack if you keep getting it? I bet those engineers have enough armor to bounce bullet rounds completely. I'm more curious to know if the speed debuff stacks. In: Lobby
Thread: UKF will be hopeless with the new patch19 Nov 2015, 14:05 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Nov 2015, 12:42 PMatouba The Churchill stats are not changed at all on this mod. Just 30 more fuel required. If you know how much fuel the KV1 costs and how much HP the KV1 has, you will agree with the Churchill cost increasing. It still performs well and don't have a number limit like all other heavy armors. So why whine like the end of the world?? Given that the KV1 is widely regarded as one of the worst units in the game, I don't think you're convincing anyone. The Churchill is also not a heavy. It is a medium. The main gun on the Churchill doesn't come remotely close to being comparable with heavies. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Brits Morta Pit slightly expensive?4 Oct 2015, 02:54 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Oct 2015, 17:11 PMDullahan It has 20 seconds of invincibility, can shield itself frim AT guns with a smoke barrage and can be quickly repaired by 210 mp engineers. It's all about where you put it but it's not hard to keep it fairly well defended. It pays for itself pretty quickly. Brace is virtually irrelevant anyway. You just keep shelling it with the LEIG so the engis all get gibbed when they try to repair it. Meanwhile, the mortar itself is contributing nothing while bleeding more HP. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: LMG Engineers?13 Sep 2015, 06:00 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Sep 2015, 05:51 AMEtherealDragon +1 Anybody who thinkss they are OP should go play British and try spamming them and find out just how terrible they are at being Assault Troops. They are strictly "hold the line" infantry. They are nice supporting troops though to soak fire and help throw out some damage but a Heavy Eng with 1 Vickers doesn't really do all that much DPS (4 models stills have Stens after all and can't close distance to engage due to their extra armor weighing as much as Thor's Hammer). I had no idea they got 2 armor though If you stick two Brens on them in addition to the Vickers, they seem to do a respectable amount of damage at long range. It makes me wonder what their other stats (and vet) are like though - aside from the armour. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M36 Jackson vs Firefly10 Sep 2015, 09:41 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2015, 23:27 PMAladdin Relic said, they wanted the FireFly to act as a "sniper"! the thing is, the Scottish guy in the UKF army is also a "sniper"! It makes me think they thought whatever in UKF is called "sniper" should have a God awful rate of fire. But apart from that FF is really not reliable compared to other TDs in the game for its cost. Yes, it can deal a huge amount of damage with Tulips, but that's not how it should be like! that doesn't let it be a reliable, dedicated tank destroyer like Jackson, SU85, or JP4. I love it how almost any tank in the game can find it out of position and circle around it and kill it. It reminds me of ISU I think it needs some adjustment so that you're able to use it similar to how you use all the TDs with more viable rate of fire. And about Tulips, UKF seem to be such munition dependent faction and the Tulip's price, makes it very risky any time you use it. Just for ex. 3 times you use the ability is equal to 1 Air Supremacy Please rework the FireFly It isn't the fire-rate that bothers me about the UKF sniper, it's the wind-up. It makes the unit feel so sluggish when you order an attack and the enemy runs back into the fog of war before he actually decides to fire. On the other hand, I really want to like the Firefly but its DPS is insanely awful for the cost. I'm fairly sure the Stug actually beats it quite handily in a stand-up fight. I don't want to see another unit like the Greyhound which is only used for its ability, rather than its core mechanics. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: The Mortar Thread9 Apr 2015, 02:48 AM The USF MHT still doesn't seem particularly effective to me. I can't really tell if I'm just getting screwed by random chance though. Either way, dedicating that much fuel to a mortar unit during the early-mid game as USF seems super risky to me. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: WHAT ABOUT SU85 ??7 Apr 2015, 02:52 AM I dunno if it's a placebo effect, but I feel like I tend to do really well with Su-85s and I certainly prefer them over T-34s. That being said, God help them if they ever get rushed by enemy armour - their mobility is atrocious. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OH Sniper2 Apr 2015, 05:33 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Apr 2015, 22:59 PM☭ Калашникова ☭ Soviet sniper's reinforce cost is 90, Wehrmacht sniper's reinforce cost is 360. And the soviet sniper will still get RNG'd Less. I don't see this being a relevant comparison in medium-high skill level games. It is more likely that the Soviet sniper will repeatedly bleed 90 MP while the OH sniper will bleed none unless the OH player really screws up their micro. Losing a rapidly-cloaking 82 HP model is pretty difficult to do if you're actually paying attention. In: Lobby
Thread: Patch March 31st changelog31 Mar 2015, 00:22 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Mar 2015, 23:45 PMAlexzandvar 40+80+260 = 380. That's the cost of 1.6 IS2's. The Sherman costs 50+90+110=250. I demand to know why the Sherman doesn't outperform the IS-2. Don't be absurd. In: Lobby
Thread: Patch March 31st changelog30 Mar 2015, 23:42 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Mar 2015, 23:34 PMAlexzandvar Why the hell is the KT going to have almost double the cost of an IS2 while having the exact same armor as it. And what's with the lack of changes to Ostheer? USF are going to be even better versus them now. It doesn't cost double that of the IS2 for starters. It performs for the fuel cost stated in the game, like every other OKW unit. It also has better HP and a better weapon profile than the IS2. This patch seems pretty underwhelming given the delay and there are plenty of units that need to be modified that haven't been touched. In: Lobby