OKW rework story

Jump back to quoted post1 Oct 2014, 02:21 AMASneakyFox

if okw could build observational posts theyd put their truck next to a key resource point, put a post on it, then put their t4 building next to it. Thats some way over the top locking down power

66% munitions income would be ridiculous, they just had their muntion income moved down to 80%, and from the few times ive played them i feel like their munitions spending power is about right. They cant just buy all the upgrades they want or throw all the grenades they want.

fuel income was probably too much before they changed munitions to be 80%, but now that they have less munitions to hold up their army until they get the panther they have to spend fuel on more P2s and pumas to keep in the game (which delays their larger tanks)

Jump back to quoted post1 Oct 2014, 02:30 AMRunToTheSun

Honestly most people complaining about OKW are scrubs or 4v4 players.

They are perfectly beatable in 1v1 and 2v2.
I see so many people complaining about OKW heavies , and yet they are so easily beatable - people just dont know how (again talking about 2v2/1v1). I saw so many streams already where people had like 4-5 tanks and did not go in for the heavies that were not even properly supported and then are surprised they dont penetrate their frontal armor.

Im really getting sick of it.

Jump back to quoted post1 Oct 2014, 06:27 AMJohnnyB

Lol, can't agree more. I would realy like to shout a big L2P in their faces but that's not the way to go. Changing OKW base build (not necesarely in the described way) can be a solution. Maybe.

Jump back to quoted post1 Oct 2014, 07:55 AMQueenRatchet123

Have fun saying that to those top 200 players. Stats prove that they even have trouble fighting axis in a 4v4

My apologies i don't want to offend the reich, You are obviously the #1 player with OKW.

I will remember to not forget that

Jump back to quoted post1 Oct 2014, 07:57 AMJohnnyB

Pffff.... that's not the idea. I'm as middling as someone can get.

Jump back to quoted post1 Oct 2014, 08:05 AMQueenRatchet123

90% winrate with okw in 4v4's

80% with oshteer in 4v4's

50% with both usf and russians

This is disgusting

This isn't a l2p issue. (in some cases yes)

Jump back to quoted post1 Oct 2014, 07:43 AMMr. Someguy

You do realise that a T-34/76 / M4 Sherman has only a 53% chance to penetrate a King Tiger in the back at point-blank, right? That means to kill a King Tiger, it needs to be hit from behind at least 16 times. This means it would take a T-34/76 an average of over 100 seconds of firing point-blank into the rear of a King Tiger to destroy it. Now factor in the Panzerschreck support and Obersoldaten escort, and it's a nigh unstoppable beast capable of dealing with any and every threat, except artillery (which it is durable enough to shrug off a hefty amount of before falling back).

I've only seen an ally lose a King Tiger once, because our opponent spammed dual M1919 Riflemen and M36 Jacksons. The rifleblob overwhelmed 2 Heavy Machine Guns and 2 Anti-Tank guns and when the King Tiger revealed itself to stop the charge, it took hits from 5-6 Jacksons sitting behind the mob. This is the only time I've seen a properly used King Tiger KIA.

Jump back to quoted post1 Oct 2014, 09:00 AM$nuffy

I honestly find that statistic hard to believe. For how long period of time is this supposed to be ?

I have good weeks, and I have bad weeks, sometimes I win 4 in a row, sometimes I lose 4 in a row.

And my W/L ration is always somewhere around 55% maybe. I think many of the balance issues ppl are complaining about are actually the product of the peculiar automatching system with which Relic is trying to manipulate with the "game experience" and "user satisfaction" issues.

Jump back to quoted post1 Oct 2014, 15:07 PMQueenRatchet123

Win/Loss Ratio

Ur denial is powerful

Jump back to quoted post1 Oct 2014, 07:43 AMMr. Someguy

You do realise that a T-34/76 / M4 Sherman has only a 53% chance to penetrate a King Tiger in the back at point-blank, right? That means to kill a King Tiger, it needs to be hit from behind up to 16 times. This means it would take a T-34/76 an average of over 100 seconds of firing point-blank into the rear of a King Tiger to destroy it. Now factor in the Panzerschreck support and Obersoldaten escort, and it's a nigh unstoppable beast capable of dealing with any and every threat, except artillery (which it is durable enough to shrug off a hefty amount of before falling back).

I've only seen an ally lose a King Tiger once, because our opponent spammed dual M1919 Riflemen and M36 Jacksons. The rifleblob overwhelmed 2 Heavy Machine Guns and 2 Anti-Tank guns and when the King Tiger revealed itself to stop the charge, it took hits from 5-6 Jacksons sitting behind the mob. This is the only time I've seen a properly used King Tiger KIA.

Jump back to quoted post1 Oct 2014, 21:34 PMRunToTheSun

And this is exactly what i mean , you wonna rely on medium tanks that are not TD's to kill a heavy?

Jump back to quoted post1 Oct 2014, 21:34 PMRunToTheSun

And this is exactly what i mean , you wonna rely on medium tanks that are not TD's to kill a heavy ?