34/85 costs 140fu it pays 15fu for 160 more hp and bit more pen then P4(lets completely ignore a minor detail that its not even a stock unit). Dual stuff is on a discount. For reference compare Wehr pair of shrecks vs OKW shreck costs since german only comparisons might actually get to you.
Jackson have no armor, no health and weaker penetration then SU-85. Turret and 240dmg is all it has really as it can't even spot for itself like SU-85.
You might want to use P4 this patch instead of spamming tigers to actually see how much its AI was buffed.
Now, following your very own logic, how much should jagdpanzer cost with superior armor and penetration to SU-85? 140fu? More?
And being doctrinal lets it being tech free-advantage rather than disadvantage.And which t-34/85 is used more dual one or single one.Dual one obviously..if its a discount its a grossly OP one pricewise.OKW shreck cost also includes that winter stuff.
Yeah and its dmg is enough kill tigers in 4 shots.If panther the german 'tank hunter' isn't allowed to kill tanks at 175 fuel,i don't see why t-34/85 and jackson at 130 fuel and 125 fuel should.
I do use it,u don't get to tiger without stug or p4.And its AI is good but nothing godly...but when soviet get a t-34/85 for 10 more mp and 5 fuel..and u try to justify that then you need to check ur brain first.
Whatever - jagd already costs 135 fuel for a 2/3rd income faction.The faction description and reduced income of OKW is supposed to be balanced by powerful and cost effective units.....its what cancels out tehir disadvanatge.Hence stuka,obersoldaten.Jagd isn't even taht powerful or cost effective.And panther certainly isn't.Puma can be said to be cost effective and strong for its price.U want to nerf the powerful OKW units-fine go ahead.But then u will also have to answer teh question..without these units,why does OKW have 2/3rd income?