Call-in Tanks
Posts: 15
Posts: 2053
Posts: 871
Oh no! Its not like OKW can make pumas, jagdpanzers, panthers, puppchens and the like by 10 CP!
Not forgetting Panzershrecks
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Oh no! Its not like OKW can make pumas, jagdpanzers, panthers, puppchens and the like by 10 CP!
And you can have jagdpanzer before any other tank hits the field in equal game.
Posts: 15
Posts: 871
Oh yeah, i forgot totally about all those units, my bad. A Jagdpanzer before any other tank, that sounds effective, i can kill infantry after 200 shots.
It's not meant to kill infantry, its meant to kill those things you are complaining about (T-34/85's)
Posts: 431 | Subs: 1
Oh yeah, i forgot totally about all those units, my bad. A Jagdpanzer before any other tank, that sounds effective, i can kill infantry after 200 shots.
So you want a tank who would kill infantry and tanks ? This is pretty rare combination. I can only offer you Elite Armored Doctrine with it's Panzer IV Ausf J. Battle Group.
Posts: 987
So you want a tank who would kill infantry and tanks ? This is pretty rare combination. I can only offer you Elite Armored Doctrine with it's Panzer IV Ausf J. Battle Group.
Or ISU, still the god of noobwar.
The issue I think is having no strong non-fuel at guns. Puppchen is pretty good but it's not gonna stand up to t34 very well with its range and power. So you'll need 3 to beat the t34s (or 2+Jagdpanzer, which means you will have no panther for another 15 minutes). That leaves you very vulnerable to infantry and with no MG42 to suppress, it can all go bad very quickly.
So, in short:
Without MG, it's not feasible to build multiple pueppchens. Without multiple pueppchens, you cannot handle dual t34-85.
Although I have to agree that the Jagdpanzer is very very nice AT.
Posts: 15
It's not meant to kill infantry, its meant to kill those things you are complaining about (T-34/85's)
What i meant is, why would u want to get it before any other tank.
Posts: 987
A flanked Jagd is a dead Jagd and 2 of them are gonna be easily flankable by the fast t34s when they are out in numbers. The small cramped maps make flanks quite easy / negate the range advantage of jagds.
In that situation, you'd kill 1 t34 then the other three would rinse the Jagd.
Panth is about 230 equivalent fuel for OKW. You're not gonna field 2 of those quick enough to handle the t34s. Or a panth and a Jagd.
I think he has a point. Call-ins should probably be restricted to 1.
Posts: 503
Permanently BannedWhat you will doo with drunks volks, blind rak43, maybe you get 1 panther, that dont deal versus 2 of then, and half of the times the enemy get a KV or other tank, with more that 2 T85, gg!
Pumas? LOL! They make puff puff and have paper armor!
You can win versus it, but with great losts, and like a no error or gg, when the sov's can lost this 2 tanks and stay in the game...
Strange thing: if the germans get a double medium tank call in in the game, this forum will be overheat, but the sov's get this cheat a months ago and no problem!?
Posts: 1820 | Subs: 2
Posts: 1384
F
Pumas? LOL! They make puff puff and have paper armor!
They're competitive with Shermans/t34-75, they got a pretty decent gun on them and their front armour is decent.
Posts: 1130
Oh no! Its not like OKW can make pumas, jagdpanzers, panthers, puppchens and the like by 10 CP!
That the counters exist is not the issue. its the rather large fuel advantage call in provides. you dont need to tech up and safe yourself a good 100 fuel so you can pump out more tanks then your opponent. in 1vs1 this is very prominent.
I would say every faction should be required to tech to gain access to their call in tanks. this makes non call in doctrines a lot more appealing.
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Theres almost no difference between holding for double T3485 rather than waiting 11CP for a Tiger.
Since the adjustment of AoE profiles, i´m less worried about any of them.
Maybe OKW lacks medium tanks to capitalize the lack of teching, but you still have Luchs and AA HT to do so.
Posts: 1637
I would say that 10CP is quite a number to hold for T34-85s. It´s not like you can´t hold 1-2paks and 2 T3 tanks as OH or something as OBK (i don´t own it).
Theres almost no difference between holding for double T3485 rather than waiting 11CP for a Tiger.
Since the adjustment of AoE profiles, i´m less worried about any of them.
Maybe OKW lacks medium tanks to capitalize the lack of teching, but you still have Luchs and AA HT to do so.
Luchs is bad...really really bad. Its like a flacid T70. The Flaktrack is so much better and comes in an early Tier and is cheaper. Thats too bad I really was looking forward to the Luchs too.
Puppchens in buildings have no problem with T34/85s. Errr duh Guards oh look I wonder what he is doing? Shrek Shrek Shreks Puppchen Puppchen.
Posts: 184
Posts: 4928
Posts: 482
Posts: 2779
lol, last time my OKW Panther can solo holding 5 T-34 85, I dunno what the hell are you talking about.
T-34 85 can't penetrate panther glacis plate FFS, and vetted Rakentanwerfer rape them very hard, harder than Pak40.
The only Allies tank can fuck up OKW is buffed IS2. USF tanks are trash, at least in the current stat.
Livestreams
60 | |||||
19 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.549203.730+3
- 2.830222.789+36
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1095612.641+19
- 5.916404.694-1
- 6.280162.633+8
- 7.305114.728+1
- 8.721440.621+3
- 9.8520.810+7
- 10.14758.717+1
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
16 posts in the last week
37 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, rudyegill
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM