Login

russian armor

Soviet mines needs at least 2x cost for its effectiveness

11 Feb 2014, 21:35 PM
#41
avatar of Jinseual

Posts: 598

People blaming unit AI or squad sizes are missing the real issue. Every Soviet mine does over 100 pct damage to infantry, there is no reduced splash damage at range it's full 100 pct kill to whatever unit is inside it's radius.

You have no control on whenever the squad bunches up or not, the mine just randomly kills full HP squads.

This adds another unnecessary luck element to the game, and this game has already too much of that.

You can have a full HP German squad lost because of an unlucky wipe from a mine, and there are already enough Soviet equipment that could do that.
11 Feb 2014, 22:36 PM
#42
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

S-Mine Field
· Cost from 80 MU to 60 MU
· Build time from 40s to 10s
· Mine spacing from 13 to 7
· Mine field can now be rotated to better enable placement

And to compensate that and bring it in line with other mine build time what will give you to all other mines? 2-3 second build time?

You seem to be forgetting that german mine field places 8+ minses, not a single one.
11 Feb 2014, 22:39 PM
#43
avatar of Omega_Warrior

Posts: 2561

jump backJump back to quoted post11 Feb 2014, 22:36 PMKatitof

And to compensate that and bring it in line with other mine build time what will give you to all other mines? 2-3 second build time?

You seem to be forgetting that german mine field places 8+ minses, not a single one.

Oh that's not a suggestion. Leaked patch notes.
11 Feb 2014, 22:51 PM
#44
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8


Oh that's not a suggestion. Leaked patch notes.

If thats true, then my jaw dropped.
I still can't imagine how will they plant that in 10 secs.
12 Feb 2014, 00:21 AM
#45
avatar of spajn
Donator 11

Posts: 928

jump backJump back to quoted post11 Feb 2014, 22:51 PMKatitof

If thats true, then my jaw dropped.
I still can't imagine how will they plant that in 10 secs.


Just get a minesweeper, they are good against mines.
12 Feb 2014, 00:28 AM
#46
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

Found it, it will also be 50% of the mines so it might be fine.
Cost effectively new ones will be worse.
12 Feb 2014, 00:34 AM
#47
avatar of Strummingbird
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 952 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post12 Feb 2014, 00:28 AMKatitof
Found it, it will also be 50% of the mines so it might be fine.
Cost effectively new ones will be worse.


Isn't mine spacing distance between the mine patches, not the number of mine patches? I thought the 13 -> 7 drop was to make the minefield more concentrated.
12 Feb 2014, 01:01 AM
#48
avatar of link0

Posts: 337

S-mine changes look awesome. I can't wait to use them.
12 Feb 2014, 01:18 AM
#49
avatar of Kronosaur0s

Posts: 1701

Unit behavior and AI pathing is the issue. If your units stepped onto 2 mines in a succession, that explains the squad wipe.

Increasing the cost? You're talking about nerfing one of the only effective and guaranteed AT weapons in the Soviet arsenal. And Soviets have to plant a crapton of them if they want any chance to go toe to toe with Ost armor. Nearly everything the Soviets have are AI based and not AT based. Zis<Pak; IS2<Tiger; T34/85<P4; ISU152<Elephant; etc, but they all > Infantry...which isa problem against Ost late game when it becomes mainly armor battles (not to say they should be equivalent to each other, but their units are near identical in roster type and CP requirements).



Zis<Pak Lol I prefer the 6 man zis

IS2<Tiger I dont think so

T34/85<P4 ROFL are you being serious on this one or just exaggerating like hell¿?
12 Feb 2014, 03:29 AM
#50
avatar of Speculator

Posts: 157

Zis<Pak Lol I prefer the 6 man zis

The Pak has a higher ROF.

IS2<Tiger I dont think so

The P4 is faster, has a higher ROF, and better armor.

T34/85<P4 ROFL are you being serious on this one or just exaggerating like hell¿?

The Tiger has a higher ROF and armor.

Are you ignoring my comparisons on an AT level? I've pointed out they're great AI tank in the rest of my post past what you've replied to. Sure, since you're mostly on the receiving end as mainly an Ost player, they're great when used effectively (especially against infantry). My post serves to point out on a 1 on 1 with a tank of their comparable class, they are inferior in their headon AT capabilities. That is a fact.
12 Feb 2014, 03:49 AM
#51
avatar of Mr. Someguy

Posts: 4928

Comparing Panther and Tiger's AI capability to IS2 is IMO wrong(they are both more AT, than AI).
If anything, you should compare IS2 AoE to Brummbar's (same AoE range, more dmg though).


I compared the IS-2 to the Tiger and Panther because that's what people like to compare it to. It's most often compared to a Tiger or a Panther by other players. While the Tiger is a health-tank, the Panther is a tank-killer, and the Sturmpanzer IV is an infantry-killer, the IS-2 is more of a combination of all 3. It has decent health but strong frontal armour, and its main gun has high damage over a large radius and high armour penetration.


jump backJump back to quoted post11 Feb 2014, 22:36 PMKatitof

And to compensate that and bring it in line with other mine build time what will give you to all other mines? 2-3 second build time?

You seem to be forgetting that german mine field places 8+ minses, not a single one.


You seem to be forgetting that Pioneers have to plant 4 patches or the 80 munitions goes to waste, and each patch takes ages to plant, and each mine does only half-health damage, and you can just use a vehicle to clear the mines with no harm done.


jump backJump back to quoted post11 Feb 2014, 22:51 PMKatitof

If thats true, then my jaw dropped.
I still can't imagine how will they plant that in 10 secs.


Same way both factions build bases so quickly they put the Amish to shame.


IS2<Tiger I dont think so


Imo the Tiger is a better tank than the IS-2 for tank vs tank combat.
12 Feb 2014, 05:05 AM
#52
avatar of Porygon

Posts: 2779

If they don't change S-mine into AOE damage, at least remove the stupid sign.
12 Feb 2014, 13:14 PM
#53
avatar of Bravus

Posts: 503

Permanently Banned
Magic mines, magic grenades, magic bullets that blind the tank, what more? And low cust...

Making the best's 2nd war tank's be like a true turtle...
12 Feb 2014, 14:42 PM
#54
avatar of Jaigen

Posts: 1130

jump backJump back to quoted post11 Feb 2014, 22:36 PMKatitof

And to compensate that and bring it in line with other mine build time what will give you to all other mines? 2-3 second build time?

You seem to be forgetting that german mine field places 8+ minses, not a single one.


40 seconds build time was one of the main reason these mines where performing badly and where up.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
Lady Xenarra: @Willy Pete The lack of April Fools this year is odd lol
02 Apr 2025, 01:34 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone not dead yet. when that happens the font will switch to Papyrus :*(
02 Apr 2025, 00:16 AM
dasheepeh: it was an honor guys :guyokay:
01 Apr 2025, 20:34 PM
aerafield: yeah I already prepared my "Can't believe there's comic mode for the 10 daily visitors even on this April 1st" :guyokay:
01 Apr 2025, 20:29 PM
Rosbone: @dasheepeh I guess that means this site is officially dead :guyokay:
01 Apr 2025, 20:19 PM
dasheepeh: no comic sans font for april 1st this year?
01 Apr 2025, 19:56 PM
Willy Pete: @Lady Xenarra this you? https://i.imgflip.com/3e4thi.jpg
01 Apr 2025, 02:53 AM
Lady Xenarra: Does anyone else think that USF needs buffs? It feels like they’re on life support sometimes
01 Apr 2025, 02:36 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone Ahh I missed that memo. I still think its a bad decision though. Adds frustration for players and isnt gonna make them that much money
27 Mar 2025, 15:46 PM
Rosbone: It is also good they left it free until after the free to play weekend. Points for that.
27 Mar 2025, 09:34 AM
Rosbone: But I agree, the cost to get a full decent Coh game pushing $115 US is not the best idea. Especially when it needs so much more work for casuals.
27 Mar 2025, 09:32 AM
Rosbone: To be fair, it was a thank you to early fans right? They said it was not free for long and it would become a pay DLC at some point.
27 Mar 2025, 09:30 AM
Willy Pete: Re-releasing free DLC so they can charge new players money for it. Brilliant marketing strategy :clap:
27 Mar 2025, 04:31 AM
Soheil: Coh2 still broken server ?
25 Mar 2025, 18:27 PM
Rosbone: Congrats to Relic. Looks like Coh3 has finally usurped Coh2 s the popular Coh. You smell terrific. :snfQuinn:.
24 Mar 2025, 02:46 AM
Nickbn: and again someone else replies. I mean come on guys. Give @adamírcz a chance
22 Mar 2025, 14:00 PM
Willy Pete: @Nickbn you didn't ask a question, and this is a chat box...
20 Mar 2025, 13:11 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone it's incredibly rude to speak on someone elses behalf, especially when a question is directly adressed to them. I understand your passion for the subject at hand but I want to hear from him.
20 Mar 2025, 10:16 AM
Rosbone: @Nickbn No, I am just saying people should not be using any Relic owned forum since they have proven they ban anyone who says true things about Coh3.
18 Mar 2025, 19:01 PM

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

418 users are online: 418 guests
0 post in the last 24h
9 posts in the last week
72 posts in the last month
Registered members: 53402
Welcome our newest member, sunwinviporge
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM