Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
If the vicker K is going to fire on the move, it should be keept for elite unit like commandos as upgrade, and not available in pair. In the current version of beta, sapper can be set up with 3x vicker k, fire on the move and have amor on top, which is very unhealthy.
Please consider replace it with rifle grenade or turn it into ukf m1919.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 498
Its literally to be a BAR copy, why wouldn't it fire on the move?
With new stats, its an LMG exclusively by name, just like BAR.
Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
But BAR is Browning Automatic Rifle. Even back in WW1 it was designed for walking fire.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1
Its literally to be a BAR copy, why wouldn't it fire on the move?
With new stats, its an LMG exclusively by name, just like BAR.
Posts: 498
Point is, if there will be a Bar clone, the bren will be a better candidate in term of practical and realistic.
Edited: To make it clear, i dont have much of an issue with the profile. But take look at the animation, in game, bar is fire from the shouder and look basically like a rifle, but the vicker k is just big, chunky and seeing a non elite troop running and firing with it while he cant do the same with a lighter bren is somewhat annoying (to me)
Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1
I wonder if replacing the bren rack with a vickers rack would be possible.
Posts: 498
Possible, but also make no sense. Bren is a standard issue weapon, Vicker K is not.
Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1
I mean if we really want to make the bren into a bar, then the vickers would take its place. Otherwise infantry sections would suffer a nerf, at long ranges at least.
But I still say the vickers should receive a buff to its current profile to emphasize its lmg role more, while restricting its availability a bit in return.
Posts: 103
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
I take it the consensus on Royal Arty flares is that they're fine? I don't have much else to say about the UKF changes personally, look in the right direction for the main part.
Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1
They will be adjusted, it just didn't make it in yet.
Posts: 498
Just to push this discussion into the most productive way, here are a few guidelines for suggestions:
- no new units;
Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1
>Raid section gets introduced...
Posts: 773
Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1
Posts: 498
The raid package got abandoned too soon but at least it have great potential, especially if it can be combine with the upgrade system of section, i believe. The raid section as an separate unit, i dont see it will go anywhere. Put assault section in there and think will fell a lot better. The infiltration commando can just be scrapped, as there are no point of using them from building anyways.
Posts: 195
As for infil commandos they should spawn with pistols with full squad size and upgrade with stens for free, similar to stormtroopers.
Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1
Imo the scoped enfield should go into pyro sections, taking up one slot, but having the critical hit ability of pathfinder and jli scoped rifles. It would also explain the extended sight.
As for infil commandos they should spawn with pistols with full squad size and upgrade with stens for free, similar to stormtroopers. (rifles on spawn on commandos would synergise too well with brens).
Posts: 479
 |
|
|
14 | ||
|
|
|
|
11 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 | ||
 |
|
|
5 | ||
 |
|
|
28 | ||
 |
|
|
22 | ||
 |
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
