Panzer IV Command Tank
Posts: 309
I like the defensive bonus it provides, I like how it can fight infantry and certain light vehicles
I don't like that it doesn't get a coaxial mg upgrade
Is this vehicle in a good place?
Posts: 306
Posts: 309
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
....
Is this vehicle in a good place?
No, it is not.
Posts: 309
No, it is not.
Ya maybe it could use some changes. I really only play Ost, and I am not pro or anything close to that. But it does seem like P4 Command Tank could use some love
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
Posts: 309
The Ostheer command tank should be a Panzer IV F2, not a Panzer IV F1.
Or make it start with armor skirts and stuff
Posts: 1794
Posts: 731
Posts: 309
Posts: 76
Posts: 833
It's an early war blitzkrieg tank so give it an acceleration and speed buff with tied to the aura when surrounded with allied armor. Then it has some flavor.
Posts: 3260
A patch cut it to 10% because it was ostensibly too powerful, but the fix didn't go through and it stayed at 20% for over a year. The complaints about it stopped nonehteless.
Now it's not a call-in, it could really do with that stronger aura to make it worthwhile.
Posts: 306
I think it should get the 20% DR aura back.
A patch cut it to 10% because it was ostensibly too powerful, but the fix didn't go through and it stayed at 20% for over a year. The complaints about it stopped nonehteless.
Now it's not a call-in, it could really do with that stronger aura to make it worthwhile.
the problem with 20% while barely having inpact on tanks in comparison to 20% is that the inf fights are somewhat fair, imagine grens with 40% reduced dmg vet 3
Posts: 3260
the problem with 20% while barely having inpact on tanks in comparison to 20% is that the inf fights are somewhat fair, imagine grens with 40% reduced dmg vet 3
It sounds great on paper, but has it ever really been a meta defining unit?
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
I think it should get the 20% DR aura back.
A patch cut it to 10% because it was ostensibly too powerful, but the fix didn't go through and it stayed at 20% for over a year. The complaints about it stopped nonehteless.
Now it's not a call-in, it could really do with that stronger aura to make it worthwhile.
If the unit needs a buff, the aura should add something in a different direction. Damage modifiers are not something you should be messing back n forth, specially on permanent things.
Posts: 3260
If the unit needs a buff, the aura should add something in a different direction. Damage modifiers are not something you should be messing back n forth.
I disagree: the 20% DR was a nice, straightforward aura with a powerful effect. There's no need to layer on even more unnecessary complexity.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Simply removed it from Mobile defense and fix it.
As for auras imo they should all scale and be split into 2 part a low one passive and bigger active.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
It sounds great on paper, but has it ever really been a meta defining unit?
Yes, during whole mobile defense meta.
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
I disagree: the 20% DR was a nice, straightforward aura with a powerful effect. There's no need to layer on even more unnecessary complexity.
The effect was there to counter old levels of lethality and only on owned territories which made the unit clunky to use.
For it to gain 20% DR back, it would have to follow one of this options:
-Munition based active ability. 10% Passive, increased to 20% for a certain duration of time.
-20% DR only on your own tanks. 10% only on allied ones and your own infantry (due to recent Gren change).
-+10% when units are on owned territories.
Livestreams
24 | |||||
16 | |||||
10 | |||||
4 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1099614.642-1
- 5.280162.633+8
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.271108.715+22
- 9.721440.621+3
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger