so IS now just as good on the move as other squads so rip their only weakness
You really forgetting a certain AT ability that other mainlines have that IS dont?
COH2 winter balance mod - discussion
23 Jan 2020, 22:30 PM
#61
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
You really forgetting a certain AT ability that other mainlines have that IS dont?
23 Jan 2020, 22:31 PM
#62
Posts: 4474
that's why u have it on RE as OTHER engineer don't
You really forgetting a certain AT ability that other mainlines have that IS dont?
katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
23 Jan 2020, 22:33 PM
#63
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
that's why u have it on RE as OTHER engineer don't
Yeah so I. sections have to rely on having an engineer squad next to them to do something that every other squad can do by itself. Sounds like a weakness for I sections. And its not like engineers have any other duties or anything...
23 Jan 2020, 22:34 PM
#64
Posts: 479
I think the goal with heavies should be to delay them by about 5 minutes across the board, obviously not units like the ISU, Elephant, or JT. But the IS-2, Pershing, and both OKW and OST Tiger can all come before 20 minutes. If heavies are just pushed back to around the 25 minute mark the game would be much better overall.
23 Jan 2020, 22:35 PM
#65
Posts: 390 | Subs: 2
SturmTiger vet ability is good now, but it's still not worth locking out the KT in this meta. Remove the mutual exclusion of the ST/KT please.
23 Jan 2020, 22:35 PM
#66
Posts: 4474
ok then why do they have smoke now ? can i upgrade any squad to have smoke and off map art ?
Yeah so I. sections have to rely on having an engineer squad next to them to do something that every other squad can do by itself. Sounds like a weakness for I sections. And its not like engineers have any other duties or anything...
katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
23 Jan 2020, 22:39 PM
#67
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
ok then why do they have smoke now ? can i upgrade any squad to have smoke and off map art ?
What does that have anything to do with your claim that I. sections have no other weaknessess besides firing on the move?
23 Jan 2020, 22:44 PM
#68
Posts: 4474
ok non fuel weakness as with smoke they will easily beat mgs like old rifle , and btw a AT nade does not invalidate a tank alone
What does that have anything to do with your claim that I. sections have no other weaknessess besides firing on the move?
btw: since u highlighted onyl that part of my post i my assume u agree to all my other points right ?
katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
23 Jan 2020, 22:48 PM
#69
Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3
SturmTiger vet ability is good now, but it's still not worth locking out the KT in this meta. Remove the mutual exclusion of the ST/KT please.
 | Playercard of T.R. Stormjäger | |||||||||||||||
|
23 Jan 2020, 22:58 PM
#70
Posts: 4474
i really hope u and the mod team take a look at the new 250 u created, it's an abomination a worse kubel that cost, more consider giving it the ability to reinforce (okw lack a non doc reinforce mobile tool, to a lesser extent even Brits have it as they can build multiple forward HQ)
and give it the kubel vet 1 ability with 100 range
right now it's just trash and useless might as well remove it from the roster
edit:
360 50 range vision on mobile vehicle vs 70 range stationary (worse than scopes and u can put those on tanks) 120 degree vision
FREE MAP HACK ON THE MOVE vs paid timed map hack stationary
200 mp and 10 fuel vs 210 mp
both die to 2 hit from tanks , 1 can actually run away
1 has an actaul weapon abd can cap points
please get Devm out of the balance team we already had 1 tourney ruined by "muh UP usf and OP okw"
katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
23 Jan 2020, 23:08 PM
#71
Posts: 3114 | Subs: 2
I'm a bit bothered why all the howitzers got a pop reduction? Was this needed by any chance?
I think they are well worth their 15 population. All this does in making them more attractive in large modes were arty is already excessively present. In small modes they are not build anyway.
I think they are well worth their 15 population. All this does in making them more attractive in large modes were arty is already excessively present. In small modes they are not build anyway.
23 Jan 2020, 23:10 PM
#72
Posts: 808
im so confused. I thought they would at least start with the most pressing issues and the most OP units so those changes can be tested the most, yet they target insignificant issues like faust on falls which don't really need testing.
guarantee they will give the jackson the 15 armour nerf and consider it balanced. Give IR 251, the ability to fire flares for a cost, this unit is a complete joke.
guarantee they will give the jackson the 15 armour nerf and consider it balanced. Give IR 251, the ability to fire flares for a cost, this unit is a complete joke.
23 Jan 2020, 23:22 PM
#73
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
ok non fuel weakness as with smoke they will easily beat mgs like old rifle , and btw a AT nade does not invalidate a tank alone
Non-fuel weakness? Lol what are you even talking about now
btw: since u highlighted onyl that part of my post i my assume u agree to all my other points right ?
Nope. Have some patience it's the first version of the preview
You can voice your disagreement with the mod team without acting like a child, like you did in that post
23 Jan 2020, 23:24 PM
#74
Posts: 390 | Subs: 2
Brit HQ glider seems a little too cost efficient. Is it intended that the Forward Retreat Point can be used without teching at all?
23 Jan 2020, 23:26 PM
#75
Posts: 4474
i mean infantry based weakness not vehicle based
Non-fuel weakness? Lol what are you even talking about now
Nope. Have some patience it's the first version of the preview
You can voice your disagreement with the mod team without acting like a child, like you did in that post
if u disagree please point at them
katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
23 Jan 2020, 23:29 PM
#76
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
OST tier 4 still untouched while brits get a bunch of early game buffs
This isn't even a point. Just a statement. There's no substance to even agree with...
And you're the only one complaining about the IRHT. It had a gamebreaking bug and was left in the game for years. I'm just happy they removed the broken feature
23 Jan 2020, 23:33 PM
#77
Posts: 4474
yes but at this point u just removed an unit, imagine if instead of fixing usf mortar they made it it had 30 range ?
This isn't even a point. Just a statement. There's no substance to even agree with...
And you're the only one complaining about the IRHT. It had a gamebreaking bug and was left in the game for years. I'm just happy they removed the broken feature
u can see it the img how much is the difference with the kubel
the unit is a worse kubel while coming later and costing fuel, it's a jk, make it a mobile reinforcing recon unit (like the doc upgrade for the 250 of osther)
katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
23 Jan 2020, 23:37 PM
#78
Posts: 3114 | Subs: 2
yes but at this point u just removed an unit, imagine if instead of fixing usf mortar they made it it had 30 range ?
u can see it the img how much is the difference with the kubel
the unit is a worse kubel while coming later and costing fuel, it's a jk, make it a mobile reinforcing recon unit (like the doc upgrade for the 250 of osther)
How can you remove a unit that was basically never used in the game modes this game is balanced around (1v1 and 2v2)? Also you are super focused on that single mini map tracking ability, while the main purpose of the unit is (now) giving sight range.
It has a different mechanic now, which circumvents a big bug. If it's UP down the line, you can always give it +10 sight range or something.
23 Jan 2020, 23:44 PM
#79
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
the unit is a worse kubel while coming later and costing fuel, it's a jk, make it a mobile reinforcing recon unit (like the doc upgrade for the 250 of osther)
Give them mobile reinforcement in the med HQ, their forward reinforcement base that can be upgraded with FRP?
No thank you
23 Jan 2020, 23:47 PM
#80
Posts: 4474
well ui already posted the stats and differences, it gives less sight than a spotting scope vehicle and u can put those on tanks
How can you remove a unit that was basically never used in the game modes this game is balanced around (1v1 and 2v2)? Also you are super focused on that single mini map tracking ability, while the main purpose of the unit is (now) giving sight range.
It has a different mechanic now, which circumvents a big bug. If it's UP down the line, you can always give it +10 sight range or something.
this is a dedicated unit that cost fuel and it's worse at it than a fucking t 70 in recon mode
+10 range does nothing give it a role, make it support by reinforcing or giving buff
it's a fragile unit alredy
btw im more than happy that they removed the op bug, but now it's useless this was more like "guys we need to fix the op bug" " remove the search light ability and let CODGUY rework it"
katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
898 | ||
|
|
|
|
12 | ||
|
|
|
|
9 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.939410.696+5
- 4.35459.857-1
- 5.599234.719+7
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.10629.785+7
- 10.527.881+18
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
11
Download
1265
Board Info
865 users are online:
865 guests
0 post in the last 24h
10 posts in the last week
26 posts in the last month
10 posts in the last week
26 posts in the last month
Registered members: 50002
Welcome our newest member, rwintoday1
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, rwintoday1
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM