Oof. Elitist spotted.
Team games ans 1v1 are wholly different games. The issues that 4v4 players face are far more obnoxious than 1v1 gameplay.
In team games jacksons are not that much issue because heavy TD is a thing and most axis teams have at least an elefant or JT to deal with allied TD. As well as multiple panthers to soak shots and bounce some of them, the problems of jacksons are diluted, while the issues with axis armor are magnified.
The problems faced in 1v1 and 4v4s are different. Nerf jackson too much, you remove usf from team games entirely.
Unless superzooks are available non doctrinally on a unit that is ubiquitious. Then yes, jacksons can be nerfed.
Nice attempt at taking things out of context. The bottom 10% player was claiming that it was a lack of skill which led to players being unable to counter the uncounterable Jackson.
Pointing out how farcical it was certainly doesn't make one an elitist. Especially since the Jackson is too good in the majority of skill brackets, and not just top level play.
In any case, the majority of competitive video games are balanced around a competitive-competent level of play. Hardly a radical or elitist sentiment. The bottom quartile of players may not understand these balance issues properly, and pointing out the flaws in their understanding isn't elitist either. Sometimes after protracted attempts to explain a relatively simple issue, patience can wear a little thin and words start to get harsher.
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
