Actually you don't. You forgot to have the option about agreeing to 2 or more of your proposals. Because if you added that option, you'd see that there would be quite a few allied fanboys who'd probably like to see ALL the buffs implemented. Because right now, the members who want to see all the buffs voted yes on every single question but people won't be able to see that in the final results.
Ever since you joined the forums, Acidfreak, you've done nothing but proposed Soviet buffs or say pathetically Soviet biased stuff such as thinking the KV8 right now is actually underpowered. And this is, I believe, your third poll about the airborne guards? And you probably ignored the fact that everybody and their dog said SU is the strongest faction right now, and hence even if there was a random SU unit that needed changing, it isn't a priority.
Well, at least you admitted you're a huge Soviet fanboy.
And in regards to my poll, the logic in my poll was entirely sound. EVERYONE who thought my poll somehow didn't work is because they got triggered by the wording of it. So in summary, was my poll logical sound? YES. Was the poll insulting to a bunch of allied sheep? YES. Was it meant to be insulting. YES. bEcUAsE fEeLinGs mATter, fAcTs dO nOt.
actually i do. I don't want this thread to be personal instead of useful discussion because
1. I really don't care what you think about me.
2. I gave the voters free choice to choose no. Unlike urs which is trapping the voter.
As for your allegations that I'm a allied fanboy. How about you explain why are you whining about OST needing buffs in almost every thread i visit every other day? Just because you have a rank higher than others doesn't mean you start calling others noob or getting rogue as far as to target the balance team which have been doing community work.
Yes it might be my 3rd post about airborne guards. And guess what? I will keep on making such posts about these troops until they are at the level of other special forces. And i have previously stated i find airborne guards exciting. It's like a fresh air in soviet commander roster.
I compared kv8 flame damage with OST halftrack and Churchill flame. And kv8's damage is indeed weaker in my experience compared with HT and Churchill. I'm not saying its weak. Just weaker in comparison. I don't have the stats but I'm welcome to accept any mistake if there's any in my observation. I can argue about individual units too on axis sode which are OP. But that's not the point here. Is it?
I just made a simple thread and i said i want discussion on these troops. Didn't necessarily beg for buffs.
How can you justify a 380 mp ppsh squad without camo when a 300 mp penal ppsh is available in the same doctrine?
How can you spend 100 munitions for 3 lmg when you have svt conscripts?
Lmg drop rate was also fixed after i and other members raised voice because previously they were dropping dps left and right.
Thankyou!