Login

russian armor

Panzerwerfer fix

9 Jan 2020, 00:02 AM
#61
avatar of achpawel

Posts: 1351

To me Katusha is much better than werfer. Area denial is a guaranteed result of its barrage. You can deny VPs etc. If you are lucky or the opponent sloppy, you will wipe with it more than with werfer. With werfer you will waste your barrages more often. To me the required change would be shorter time between the sound and rockets hitting the closer the range.
9 Jan 2020, 00:03 AM
#62
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

To me Katusha is much better than werfer. Area denial is a guaranteed result of its barrage. You can deny VPs etc. If you are lucky or the opponent sloppy, you will wipe with it more than with werfer. With werfer you will waste your barrages more often. To me the required change would be shorter time between the sound and rockets hitting the closer the range.

That's because katy IS area denial weapon(this is specifically why it doesn't shoot all of its 16 rockets in continuous barrage), while pwerfer is "you no longer have this squad" alpha strike weapon.
9 Jan 2020, 00:09 AM
#63
avatar of Mr Carmine

Posts: 1289

To me Katusha is much better than werfer. Area denial is a guaranteed result of its barrage. You can deny VPs etc. If you are lucky or the opponent sloppy, you will wipe with it more than with werfer. With werfer you will waste your barrages more often. To me the required change would be shorter time between the sound and rockets hitting the closer the range.


Precision strike was removed from soviets mortars and katty because it garanteed wipes with no reaction time.

You want its primary barrage to be like that? And how is that not op? Ow i get it if ost can do it its fine.

With werfer you waste barrages more often but when they hit they are more devistating then the katty,s for sure. The werfer is fine, people just want an easy wipe machine for their main faction.
9 Jan 2020, 00:18 AM
#64
avatar of achpawel

Posts: 1351


That's because katy IS area denial weapon(this is specifically why it doesn't shoot all of its 16 rockets in continuous barrage), while pwerfer is "you no longer have this squad" alpha strike weapon.


Imo it is exactly why katusha is more useful=better (you no longer have this squad is exaggerated and requires really much better micro than from opponents' to make it work like that - same skill level it will be "you wasted your barrage again")
9 Jan 2020, 00:22 AM
#65
avatar of achpawel

Posts: 1351



Precision strike was removed from soviets mortars and katty because it garanteed wipes with no reaction time.

You want its primary barrage to be like that? And how is that not op? Ow i get it if ost can do it its fine.

With werfer you waste barrages more often but when they hit they are more devistating then the katty,s for sure. The werfer is fine, people just want an easy wipe machine for their main faction.


I agree that making it fall in shorter time might make it too deadly. But then it should become more area denial toll too, rather than semi reliable (basically requiring only opponent micro to suck) to be effective. Generally, alpha strike indirect fire unit seems a bad idea (Your mortar arguments seem to confirm it), unless maybe you just make it cheaper than Katy and leave as is.
9 Jan 2020, 01:14 AM
#66
avatar of SkysTheLimit

Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1

Make the officer non doc then we can talk.


Why
9 Jan 2020, 01:18 AM
#67
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279



Imo it is exactly why katusha is more useful=better (you no longer have this squad is exaggerated and requires really much better micro than from opponents' to make it work like that - same skill level it will be "you wasted your barrage again")

If you judge by area denial then yes the area denial weapon is better. Funny how that works.
9 Jan 2020, 03:42 AM
#68
avatar of ZeroZeroNi

Posts: 1563



Why
if people are gonna argue that werfer us fine due to the officers op insta 2nd barrage. Then they should make it non doc
9 Jan 2020, 09:03 AM
#69
avatar of Widerstreit

Posts: 1392


...


That is true, but it depends on the rocket speed etc. could be changed. Or would you say Katjusha, Calliope and Mattress are op?

My spot is, the Panzerwerfer was the only mobile weapon-platform was able to change direct fire with mortar-mode. So, why not simply use the most logical solution? ^^

9 Jan 2020, 09:50 AM
#70
avatar of T.R. Stormjäger

Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3

if people are gonna argue that werfer us fine due to the officers op insta 2nd barrage. Then they should make it non doc


Nice straw man lol
9 Jan 2020, 11:01 AM
#71
avatar of thedarkarmadillo

Posts: 5279



That is true, but it depends on the rocket speed etc. could be changed. Or would you say Katjusha, Calliope and Mattress are op?

My spot is, the Panzerwerfer was the only mobile weapon-platform was able to change direct fire with mortar-mode. So, why not simply use the most logical solution? ^^


Because it's unnecessary and people who want it to be able to tank multiple shots and remove the travel time are not interested in learning how to use it properly and changing the format of the weapon to cater to this who, again, don't want to learn how to use the current one properly adds unnecessary work and takes resources away from actually under performing units and mechanics like the entirety of the British faction.
9 Jan 2020, 12:08 PM
#72
avatar of Mr Carmine

Posts: 1289



I agree that making it fall in shorter time might make it too deadly. But then it should become more area denial toll too, rather than semi reliable (basically requiring only opponent micro to suck) to be effective. Generally, alpha strike indirect fire unit seems a bad idea (Your mortar arguments seem to confirm it), unless maybe you just make it cheaper than Katy and leave as is.


I dont see a reason to make it cheaper. The katty is more vunerable. Small arms hurt a katty more then a werfer. The longer spread out barrage only adds to this. Because it needs to expose it self longer in a close range barrage. They katty has no turret or any other weapon on it.

I think the werfer is fine as is.
9 Jan 2020, 12:17 PM
#73
avatar of Widerstreit

Posts: 1392


Because it's unnecessary and people who want it to be able to tank multiple shots and remove the travel time are not interested in learning how to use it properly and changing the format of the weapon to cater to this who, again, don't want to learn how to use the current one properly adds unnecessary work and takes resources away from actually under performing units and mechanics like the entirety of the British faction.


That is true, can't say no. But it is sad, because CoH2 waisted most potential by simply beeing not accurate, so many things had to become fantasy-balanced, cutting into the game logic. There are some may wrong animations, false fx_, complete unlogical DPS. CoH1 made many things way better in Vanilla, I would simply copy some units (or imitate them).
9 Jan 2020, 13:47 PM
#74
avatar of achpawel

Posts: 1351



I dont see a reason to make it cheaper. The katty is more vunerable. Small arms hurt a katty more then a werfer. The longer spread out barrage only adds to this. Because it needs to expose it self longer in a close range barrage. They katty has no turret or any other weapon on it.

I think the werfer is fine as is.


IMO talking about durability here makes little sense. Both are very voulnerable. Of course it could account for like 10-20 manpower. The real difference is the fact that a short range Katty barrage is really deadly and lands rockets very quickly, it also denies the area. Katty's price should be higher because of it. Definitely a werfer shouldn't be more expensive.
9 Jan 2020, 14:57 PM
#75
avatar of ZeroZeroNi

Posts: 1563



That is true, but it depends on the rocket speed etc. could be changed. Or would you say Katjusha, Calliope and Mattress are op?

My spot is, the Panzerwerfer was the only mobile weapon-platform was able to change direct fire with mortar-mode. So, why not simply use the most logical solution? ^^

Hmmm.... sure.
9 Jan 2020, 15:54 PM
#76
avatar of Khan

Posts: 578


pwerfer is "you no longer have this squad" alpha strike weapon.


Sometimes I wonder if we play the same game....... Oh wait. :snfPeter:
9 Jan 2020, 17:14 PM
#77
avatar of SupremeStefan

Posts: 1222

9 Jan 2020, 19:16 PM
#78
avatar of Mr Carmine

Posts: 1289



IMO talking about durability here makes little sense. Both are very voulnerable. Of course it could account for like 10-20 manpower. The real difference is the fact that a short range Katty barrage is really deadly and lands rockets very quickly, it also denies the area. Katty's price should be higher because of it. Definitely a werfer shouldn't be more expensive.


Yes both are vunrable, one is more vunerable. That defenitly should be counted for in the price.
The werfer barrage is more concentrated and more deadly when it hits all at once. The katty is only deadly up close and denies the area during the longer barrage. Again this exposes the more vunerable katty to return fire longer then the werfer. Again the werfer also has a turret and fire all within a second. Meaning less time being exposed to return fire.

Perfectly balanced between ost and soviet.
I might be out of date here but domt katty and werder both cost 360mp and 80 or 85 fuel?
9 Jan 2020, 21:35 PM
#79
avatar of SkysTheLimit

Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1

if people are gonna argue that werfer us fine due to the officers op insta 2nd barrage. Then they should make it non doc


But it's fine without the officer... Nothing wrong with the werfer
10 Jan 2020, 05:02 AM
#80
avatar of KiwiBirb

Posts: 789

The werfer cannot do area denial
The katushka can

The werfer can alpha strike at close range
The katushka can alpha strike at close range

The werfer costs more

Werfer costs more and does less.

An incendiary or spaced (5 bursts of 2) barrage would not make it OP at alpha strike and would allow it to perform at the same level as the opposing unit with the same cost.

1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
Lady Xenarra: @Willy Pete The lack of April Fools this year is odd lol
Last Wednesday, 01:34 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone not dead yet. when that happens the font will switch to Papyrus :*(
Last Wednesday, 00:16 AM
dasheepeh: it was an honor guys :guyokay:
Last Tuesday, 20:34 PM
aerafield: yeah I already prepared my "Can't believe there's comic mode for the 10 daily visitors even on this April 1st" :guyokay:
Last Tuesday, 20:29 PM
Rosbone: @dasheepeh I guess that means this site is officially dead :guyokay:
Last Tuesday, 20:19 PM
dasheepeh: no comic sans font for april 1st this year?
Last Tuesday, 19:56 PM
Willy Pete: @Lady Xenarra this you? https://i.imgflip.com/3e4thi.jpg
Last Tuesday, 02:53 AM
Lady Xenarra: Does anyone else think that USF needs buffs? It feels like they’re on life support sometimes
Last Tuesday, 02:36 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone Ahh I missed that memo. I still think its a bad decision though. Adds frustration for players and isnt gonna make them that much money
27 Mar 2025, 15:46 PM
Rosbone: It is also good they left it free until after the free to play weekend. Points for that.
27 Mar 2025, 09:34 AM
Rosbone: But I agree, the cost to get a full decent Coh game pushing $115 US is not the best idea. Especially when it needs so much more work for casuals.
27 Mar 2025, 09:32 AM
Rosbone: To be fair, it was a thank you to early fans right? They said it was not free for long and it would become a pay DLC at some point.
27 Mar 2025, 09:30 AM
Willy Pete: Re-releasing free DLC so they can charge new players money for it. Brilliant marketing strategy :clap:
27 Mar 2025, 04:31 AM
Soheil: Coh2 still broken server ?
25 Mar 2025, 18:27 PM
Rosbone: Congrats to Relic. Looks like Coh3 has finally usurped Coh2 s the popular Coh. You smell terrific. :snfQuinn:.
24 Mar 2025, 02:46 AM
Nickbn: and again someone else replies. I mean come on guys. Give @adamírcz a chance
22 Mar 2025, 14:00 PM
Willy Pete: @Nickbn you didn't ask a question, and this is a chat box...
20 Mar 2025, 13:11 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone it's incredibly rude to speak on someone elses behalf, especially when a question is directly adressed to them. I understand your passion for the subject at hand but I want to hear from him.
20 Mar 2025, 10:16 AM
Rosbone: @Nickbn No, I am just saying people should not be using any Relic owned forum since they have proven they ban anyone who says true things about Coh3.
18 Mar 2025, 19:01 PM

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

695 users are online: 695 guests
1 post in the last 24h
13 posts in the last week
73 posts in the last month
Registered members: 53296
Welcome our newest member, vb88cx
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM