Lago give it a rest man, stop grasping at straws to support a bad argument lol.
Stormjager give it a rest man, stop grasping at straws to support a bad argument lol.
Why people complain about falls and not 2x bren mandos
29 Dec 2019, 21:12 PM
#41
Posts: 3260
Stormjager give it a rest man, stop grasping at straws to support a bad argument lol.
29 Dec 2019, 21:14 PM
#42
Posts: 789
Zero if you don’t play have experience with Brits don’t talk about them. That’s why I don’t try not to talk about OKW/USF
Most of my ideas are probably bad, - but I try and share lots of them
and maybe some of them will be good an improve the game
One can hope
and maybe some of them will be good an improve the game
One can hope
29 Dec 2019, 21:17 PM
#43
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Isn't the point of good british play to make your enemy want for your point's?
No, the point of british, soviet, usf and german good play is to hold 3 victory points, but you're not always going to get to them all first and be allowed to entrentch heavily without being contested.
I don't own em. But my friend does so it's not like I haven't played em.
That's like saying your friend had sex, so you know how it feels and don't need to experience it yourself.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
29 Dec 2019, 21:41 PM
#44
Posts: 4474
cause they are OP and will ruin the tournament........
wait a second why where they never picked or lost when picked, why usf and soviet have the best win rate
wait a second why where they never picked or lost when picked, why usf and soviet have the best win rate
katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
29 Dec 2019, 22:13 PM
#45
Posts: 3260
cause they are OP and will ruin the tournament........
wait a second why where they never picked or lost when picked, why usf and soviet have the best win rate
The Volksblob was beatable.
It was removed because it was an abomination, not because it was unbeatable.
29 Dec 2019, 22:26 PM
#47
Posts: 4474
im talking about falls , u know what op asked right ?
The Volksblob was beatable.
It was removed because it was an abomination, not because it was unbeatable.
katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
29 Dec 2019, 22:42 PM
#48
Posts: 3260
im talking about falls , u know what op asked right ?
You suggested Fallschirmjager weren't gamebreaking overpowered because they didn't get used in the most recent 1v1 tournament.
I replied by drawing a comparison to the Volksblob, which was also not gamebreaking, but was patched out because it made the game worse.
No moron. I'm saying i'v played Brits on his account.
That's not something you want to boast about publicly.
Not unless you'd like Relic to ban your account.
29 Dec 2019, 23:40 PM
#49
Posts: 930
Falls are fine, it's the stupid ambush that is too strong, it melts any infantry in seconds making the falls vet like crazy and becoming even stronger faster.
Ambush have to go or get some heavy nerf.
Ambush have to go or get some heavy nerf.
30 Dec 2019, 00:09 AM
#50
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
cause they are OP and will ruin the tournament........
wait a second why where they never picked or lost when picked, why usf and soviet have the best win rate
Remember when SiphonX gave a list of reasons at the beginning of his post that you should take that data with a grain of salt? Sample size, skill difference, starting positions, etc...
I'm sure you do, you're just pretending he didn't say it for some reason
30 Dec 2019, 01:05 AM
#51
Posts: 1563
You suggested Fallschirmjager weren't gamebreaking overpowered because they didn't get used in the most recent 1v1 tournament.
I replied by drawing a comparison to the Volksblob, which was also not gamebreaking, but was patched out because it made the game worse.
That's not something you want to boast about publicly.
Not unless you'd like Relic to ban your account.
Really they'd ban a customer for that????
30 Dec 2019, 01:15 AM
#52
Posts: 3260
Really they'd ban a customer for that????
If you're just trying out a faction on somebody else's account? Probably not if you're staying out of automatch and tournaments.
30 Dec 2019, 01:59 AM
#53
Posts: 556
Falls are fine. Leave them be.
Grens are finally good.
30 Dec 2019, 02:36 AM
#54
Posts: 4474
the excuse for falls nerf was that they would ruin tourney suprise they didn't, btw if falls are so op please do create a measure for them, maybe shown some multiplayer stats ? Cause if not in game stats or tourney stats how do u Say they are op ?
Remember when SiphonX gave a list of reasons at the beginning of his post that you should take that data with a grain of salt? Sample size, skill difference, starting positions, etc...
I'm sure you do, you're just pretending he didn't say it for some reason
katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
Katitof-2018
30 Dec 2019, 05:18 AM
#55
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
the excuse for falls nerf was that they would ruin tourney suprise they didn't
Whose excuse? You really need to stop reading 1 person's post and attributing it to everyone else who ever talks about the same unit. Its getting really old
btw if falls are so op please do create a measure for them, maybe shown some multiplayer stats ? Cause if not in game stats or tourney stats how do u Say they are op ?
You can decide that the in-game stats say their not OP, but that's your opinion. Some disagree with you, including me. As for the tourney stats, you can re-read my last post OR just read Siphons actual message
No one is saying the commander is OP btw, just the squad. You can buff the commander while nerfing the squad if thats needed. Your point about the tourney reflects on the whole commander, not the squad and even then the data is still unreliable
30 Dec 2019, 05:32 AM
#56
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
He said counterplay them, not show up within 5m and throw nukenade before paras react..
He said you can counterplay them with cqc infantry AND light vehicles, which you chopped off the end of his post when you quoted him
He's hardly "grasping at straws". Idk how you can say that when you ignored half his argument
PS: distrofio was talking about dps nerfs. Don’t bring up snares.
You do realize he was agreeing with Lago, right? And that Lago brought up snares before distrofio even posted in the thread?
30 Dec 2019, 05:58 AM
#57
Posts: 1289
Falls are fine. Leave them be.
Without the faust they are fine. Then we can leave them be. Its from when volks/stock okw lacked fausts.
30 Dec 2019, 06:18 AM
#58
Posts: 2358
Without the faust they are fine. Then we can leave them be. Its from when volks/stock okw lacked fausts.
Why don't we ask to remove volks pfaust and leave it for falls.
Make spios assault package a little cheaper and give them pfaust instead of pshrek.
And then let's watch okw burn to ashes
30 Dec 2019, 06:57 AM
#59
Posts: 3423 | Subs: 1
I would like snares to be different in coh3. Maybe expand on the % HP idea, with different crits for vehicles at 75%, 50%, 25% hp or something like that.
Engine damage like it is now would be only at lower HP, something like the AEC snare for higher HP levels
Engine damage like it is now would be only at lower HP, something like the AEC snare for higher HP levels
30 Dec 2019, 09:09 AM
#60
Posts: 1563
I would like snares to be different in coh3. Maybe expand on the % HP idea, with different crits for vehicles at 75%, 50%, 25% hp or something like that.
Engine damage like it is now would be only at lower HP, something like the AEC snare for higher HP levels
Or maybe have almost 0 snares like coh1. In coh1 only US had snares(well you could argue that the at ht's thread breaker was a sanre).
0 user is browsing this thread:
Livestreams
 |
|
|
36 | ||
 |
|
|
14 | ||
 |
|
|
182 | ||
|
|
|
|
6 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1100614.642+1
- 5.280162.633+8
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.271108.715+22
- 9.721440.621+3
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1231
Board Info
821 users are online:
821 guests
2 posts in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
40 posts in the last month
8 posts in the last week
40 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49070
Welcome our newest member, Blesofsk
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Blesofsk
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM