Login

russian armor

Kv8 shoots with water?

28 Nov 2019, 10:40 AM
#1
avatar of Ritter

Posts: 255

Permanently Banned
it kills way too slow.
145 fuel and extremly slow tank. It hsould kill faster.
28 Nov 2019, 10:55 AM
#2
avatar of JulianSnow

Posts: 321

The KV8 tank performs extremely well when I use it. Even tho it had a small nerf some patches ago (IIRC it had its flame burst reduced somewhat).

It has incredable armor, just don't get it snared. It even has a 45mm gun swap so it can effectivly fight off light armor aswell.

No complaints at all.
28 Nov 2019, 11:12 AM
#3
avatar of Ritter

Posts: 255

Permanently Banned
LOl at just dont get it snered. Kv8 has to go into snare range bc of its low range
28 Nov 2019, 11:32 AM
#4
avatar of JulianSnow

Posts: 321

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Nov 2019, 11:12 AMRitter
LOl at just dont get it snered. Kv8 has to go into snare range bc of its low range


Full health KV8 won't get snared with 1 faust but it does if you dive into 2 grens and an ATG up front. It all depends on your gameplay.

Also support it with an SU85(or ZiS3) may help.
28 Nov 2019, 12:42 PM
#5
avatar of Grining Cat

Posts: 98

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Nov 2019, 10:40 AMRitter
it kills way too slow.
145 fuel and extremly slow tank. It should kill faster.

KV8 shoots with water?


Hey Ritter, that´s a serious complain and it´s completely reasonable. You are right about that.

Does the KV8 shoot with water? Actually YES. The KV8 shoots with water
for the very reason to get your soldiers clean as fast as possible at the frontline.

However, there is one important point to remember about the commander,
when you play the "nice and clean soldiers doctrine"...

...don´t forget to build at least two cargo-trucks with enough water-balloons
to refill that massive tank on the frontline, since the KV8 is very slow and
it takes to long to refill it in base every time. It´s much more efficient to transport these water balloons to the frontline with these trucks to keep your tank firing.

Have a good day <444>3
28 Nov 2019, 13:25 PM
#6
avatar of porkloin

Posts: 356

Found Xi Jinping's alt account
28 Nov 2019, 16:26 PM
#7
avatar of distrofio

Posts: 2358

It's even better, historically KV-8 runned on water engines and of course shoot water from their water shooting adaptated turret.

No soldier will be dehydrated in the battlefield.

Some people argue if KV-8 were viable submarines but it's yet a mistery
28 Nov 2019, 20:00 PM
#8
avatar of Grining Cat

Posts: 98

It's even better, historically KV-8 runned on water engines and of course shoot water from their water shooting adaptated turret.

No soldier will be dehydrated in the battlefield.

Some people argue if KV-8 were viable submarines but it's yet a mistery



Ya, water supplies on the battlefield were really important. KV-8 were quite essential, when it came to water and "having a good shower on the frontline" issues.

KV-8 as submarine? That´s really interesting!! Thank you very much for sharing this historical information! Saved my day!
28 Nov 2019, 21:34 PM
#9
avatar of Cresc

Posts: 378

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Nov 2019, 10:40 AMRitter
it kills way too slow.
145 fuel and extremly slow tank. It hsould kill faster.



Don't bother, everybody is convinced the KV8 is op, when in truth this unit has been nerfed down to a complete joke in 1v1.
28 Nov 2019, 21:38 PM
#10
avatar of Acidfreak

Posts: 281

honestly i will take a hetzer or flame halftrack over kv8 anyday
28 Nov 2019, 21:40 PM
#11
avatar of Acidfreak

Posts: 281

i would want its armor reduced and its offensive capabilities improved and maybe added to t3? this way its more in line with hetzer timing which is still relevant . at t4 you already have to go for a tank destroyer to fight thsoe axis tanks so cant exactly make kv8 as the first tank
29 Nov 2019, 05:49 AM
#12
avatar of KiwiBirb

Posts: 789

See, the British tried to disguise their battle tank program in ww1 by calling them water carriers for the desert, but in ww2 the soviets realized that the British had it wrong, disguise your water carriers as battle tanks!
29 Nov 2019, 06:04 AM
#13
avatar of Ritter

Posts: 255

Permanently Banned
i would want its armor reduced and its offensive capabilities improved and maybe added to t3? this way its more in line with hetzer timing which is still relevant . at t4 you already have to go for a tank destroyer to fight thsoe axis tanks so cant exactly make kv8 as the first tank

+1
U make kv8 first, u lose
29 Nov 2019, 06:05 AM
#14
avatar of Ritter

Posts: 255

Permanently Banned
jump backJump back to quoted post28 Nov 2019, 21:34 PMCresc



Don't bother, everybody is convinced the KV8 is op, when in truth this unit has been nerfed down to a complete joke in 1v1.

I dont know how people can be so deluded and believe that kv8 is a good unit
29 Nov 2019, 10:27 AM
#15
avatar of Ritter

Posts: 255

Permanently Banned
29 Nov 2019, 11:08 AM
#16
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

KV-8 does not need anymore damage and its a cost efficient unit.

On the other hand all flamer units would use a redesign.

The DOT damage should be moved to an ability allowing to deliver lots of damage but with limitations.

The these specialized unit could have their cost reduced so that they are cheaper than main battle tanks that can deal with different types of targets.
29 Nov 2019, 13:26 PM
#17
avatar of Aerohank

Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1

I'm going to have to agree with the OP. The KV-8 feels really meh. It's priced on the high end of medium tanks but I don't feel more threatened by it than say a p4 in terms of anti infanty power.
29 Nov 2019, 14:39 PM
#18
avatar of Stug life

Posts: 4474

I'm going to have to agree with the OP. The KV-8 feels really meh. It's priced on the high end of medium tanks but I don't feel more threatened by it than say a p4 in terms of anti infanty power.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1teRM94ArE&t=24m6s&t=24m6s /thread
29 Nov 2019, 14:50 PM
#19
avatar of Aarotron

Posts: 563

jump backJump back to quoted post29 Nov 2019, 06:05 AMRitter

I dont know how people can be so deluded and believe that kv8 is a good unit


I dont know how someone can be so deluded and refuse to accept thought thst unit is fine as 90% disagrees with ops argument.
29 Nov 2019, 15:18 PM
#20
avatar of Aerohank

Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1teRM94ArE&t=24m6s&t=24m6s /thread


I mean, unscreened AT guns vs a KV8 and upgraded guards. 1 half health AT gun that retreats after his first shot, and the second AT gun stops firing to retreat while still at 5 men and then gets caught in an unfortunate death-loop.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

709 users are online: 709 guests
1 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49065
Welcome our newest member, Huhmpal01
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM