Profile of Burts

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 1702

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/Burts5556
Steam: 76561198033352922


Thread: Petition for sloth emote on .org1 Nov 2015, 17:26 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Nov 2015, 10:54 AMsiddolio OSsloth SIDDOLIO OSsloth HE LIVES ~ OSsloth ~ SIDDOLIO IS ALIVE ~ OSsloth ~ ~ OSsloth ~ In: Scrap Yard
Thread: EU Migrant crisis31 Oct 2015, 17:44 PM It's all going to be fine, trust me In: Scrap Yard
Thread: Pershing feedback31 Oct 2015, 16:27 PM Pershing is fine. It's a hard hitting, fast , mobile but fairly fragile heavy. It has great synergy with the combined arms ability and its vet bonuses are great and a good vet 1 ability. Please dont change it relic, you actually did it right this time In: Lobby
Thread: Is it just me or hmg.50 get really good?31 Oct 2015, 15:49 PM It's always been a decent MG, only difference now that it doesnt cost more than pgrens to reinforce. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Flame Hetzer Blows30 Oct 2015, 09:34 AM So it seems that all vehicle flame weapons were affected by the DOT damage nerf. Hmm, well, this is definately unintended, i hope relic will fix this soon. Probably won't. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Relic Stream - October 2829 Oct 2015, 16:18 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Oct 2015, 21:07 PM__deleted__ I will describe you why not only hetzer but also ALL flame tanks will be useless this patch. kv8 and crocodille damage decreased from 16 to 10 so now it should have 62,5 % of prenerf (OP) damage output. But there is also "hidden" direct nerf to them - we increased dot frequencity from 0,5 second to 1,25 second so this means before kv8 make 16 dmg every half second but now it make 10 damage every 1,25 second. So this will mean it will do now 25 % of previous damage (5 times it did damage before , now it damage 2 times) so this will mean it will do 25 % of previos damage and the hetzer is the same (and croco too ) SO YOU WILL NEED TO ATTACK INFANTRY BY FLAME TANKS 4 TIMES LONGER TO WIPE IT. This is wrong. DoT damage will only affect molotovs, flame nades, incendiary arty and stuff that actually leaves a visible flame on the ground. That will be nerfed. Flamethrower damage output like handheld and vehicle ones will not be nerfed. Aside from damage reduction of kv-8 and croc, of course. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OKW :Faction design Failure29 Oct 2015, 15:01 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Oct 2015, 14:29 PMausterlitz Looking at this faction which is now spamming Leig's every game because basically its useless at everything else,we should look back at how it got here. The basic weakness of this faction are crippling munition and fuel penalties.The design feature of this faction stated that this disadvantage would be compensated by 2 things - 1]Extremely powerful Units 2] 5-star veterancy Now lets look at number 1 and the transformation of some of these once powerful units. 1.Sturmpio - Nerfed (mainly its range) .(subsequently improved a little,but is being proven again and again as incapable of saving volks from rifles/shocks/brits blobs). 2.Stuka Zu fuss - Nerfed 3.Obersoldaten - Nerfed into uselessness 4.King Tiger - Nerfed into relative non-use Now coming to point 2 - How many times do we see units with vet 4 and vet 5 except for volks in competitive games.Rarely.The veterancy costs are too high.The one unit that regularly could reach these vet levels (volks)had its veterancy effects nerfed.So basically vet 5 is more impressive on paper than in-game. With its 2 main 'strengths' neutered while still being burdened by resource penalty the main premise of this faction no longer applies,as it has no tangible 'strengths' left to cover for its glaring weakness.Which is what is the cause of the current sate of faction)especially after upcoming leig crutch removal) Maybe its time to convert the broken faction into a regular faction thats enjoyable to play.Eliminate the whole 'theme' thing that has failed. Remove the whole vet 5 thing.Largely useless in competitive games. Remove resource penalties. Only problems to this would be too fast panther and king tiger.So - Gate panther unlock in flak truck beyond another upgrade. And Restrict King tiger to 1.While King tiger on field fuel penalty is back(66% fuel income). Make small teching cost changes if necessary. The inability to build caches can be kept as a sop to theme. And you will have a competitive and enjoyable faction. Lets do some fact checking. 1) Werent nerfed, they got a pretty nice survivability buff but a DPS nerf. But then they also got a nice reinforcement decrease. 2)Stuka was never nerfed. Lol wut? 3) Obers got a nice 10mp reinforce reduction last patch. They are pretty decent now. 4) KT is fine. OKW will always be UP/OP because of the poorly designed feature of volks. Currently OKW has way too overpowering anti tank, mostly in the name of jagdpanzer, and shrecks on 5 man durable infantry is a terrible idea. But OKW anti infantry is balls, which leads them to sucking in 1v1s. This is the main issue with OKW, they just get overrun by allied infantry blobs in the early-mid game. Until volks shrecks is somehow removed and volks redesigned, OKW will have to stay this way. In: Lobby
Thread: Relic Stream - October 2828 Oct 2015, 20:50 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Oct 2015, 20:44 PMdaspoulos Also costs the exact same on a faction with a fuel penalty, no turret, lower durability and less HP. ABsolutely worthless veterancy as it required 45 men killed to even achieve vet1 God just lol. Airborne with thompsons are 10 mp cheaper than rangers. "significant" Yeah that 5.5 second reload with 4 fuckin AOE and 50 range, just gonna be squad wipe city. The pershing is going to have better AI than an is2 and a tiger. Shitty top mounted turrets don't mean shit when you can just derp blast entire squads from 50 range + turn on combined arms self spotting increased range bullshit. Lol just lol. You attack people for being biased, but all you're doing is the same exact shit conveniently forgetting everything that doesn't suit the argument and propping up your own because you know the unbiased truth makes your argument terrible. 4 AOE? Tiger has 3.5 AOE and IS-2 i dont remember but also has way better AOE. Tiger has 45 range. Oh noes. How horrible. Tiger also has faster reload, and less scatter i believe. But gotta scream OP, because i have no idea what im actually talking about. Better AI than IS-2 means jack shit because IS-2 is completely awful againts infantry. Now, if it will be around the same anti infantry as a tiger, then obviously will be OP because its not axis Airborne are 28mp to reinforce, rangers are 32. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Relic Stream - October 2828 Oct 2015, 20:36 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Oct 2015, 20:28 PMAngryKitten465 Lolololol one commander glorious with super tank and infantry of the gods. Other doctrine gives flamers to units that don't need them, gives flamehetzer that can't kill shit and gives mp return for lost models to a faction that is floating manpower 90% of the time. This is simply a case of lelic being hurdurrdurr lelic that pisses people off. They have no clue to what they are doing. Add potent and good commanders for every faction, or don't. Ah yes, flamehetzer doing exactly same DPS as croc/kv-8 is underpowered, horribly. Clearly it needs to do more damage because its axis MP return for a faction that floats MP is extremelly strong. You know that OKW doesn't float MP in normal games right? I mean they get way more MP than other factions, and good OKW players will use that MP float to spam massive hordes of infantry for their a-move blob attacks. OKW floats mp only if the OKW player is retarded, a good OKW player will shit out massive quantities of raketens LEIGs and volks. More MP is very strong. Oh and by the way, rangers have the durability of 6.25 men. So slightly more durable than airborne. They do less DPS than airborne because they have same amount of thompsons but less one less carbine. Not to mention airborne get fire up, democharges and get the option to go LMGs. And being significantly cheaper. Infantry of the gods right? Super tank? Pershing has the exactly same stats as the comet durability wise, has worse veterancy. Is incomparably slower compared to the comet (still decently fast though) and only has somewhat better pen and AOE. While being 13CPs and 50 fuel more expensive. Comet is a supertank according to you? EDIT : Holy shit sorry for being so aggresive. I got wonked up too easily In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Brit Sniper shouldn't be able to Crit 222's engine27 Oct 2015, 17:44 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Oct 2015, 13:20 PMJohnnyB There are tons of answers other forumites gave you to your "british sniper is not OP" little asertion. Why should I bother? Oh well.... It is OP because there is no other sniper in this game that can block/softcounter/ damage it's verry counter ( a unit that was created or has the role to counter him that is. If you disagree, just read the patch notes from Relic that specifically changed the kubel, 222, and other units such those to be more efficient on sniper hunt). Extend this feature to other units, for instance: Panzer 4 comes into scene and "blocks" the 57 mm AT gun (or any allied AT gun as you like) with one stunning shot. Nice, huh? And there is also no other sniper in the game that shoots as slow or is as sluggish as the british sniper. Just because the brit sniper is different doesnt mean its OP. Your comparison to AT guns and tanks is nonsensical. The panzer IV already can solo AT guns easily if it flanks them. These comparisons are completely stupid because an anti tank sniper vs light vehicles is completely different from tanks vs AT guns. Oh, and by the way the british sniper is supposed to be a counter to light vehicles too. Dont you know that he has an anti tank rifle? In: COH2 Balance