Profile of Burts

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 1702

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/Burts5556
Steam: 76561198033352922


Thread: Brit Sniper shouldn't be able to Crit 222's engine26 Oct 2015, 13:26 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Oct 2015, 13:22 PMSpaceHamster The main problem is that light vehicles are not a counter to the UKF sniper. So you have to counter snipe him. The problem with this logic is that OKW has no sniper. That means you gotta rely on falls/JLI or walking stuka/lucky leig shots to kill him. Otherwise, a properly micro'd and screened sniper is nigh impossible to kill with OKW. Short of puma aimed shot sniping him back that is. The snare needs to turn into a stun or a temporary damaged engine. UKF already has an AT gun right off the bat with bonus accuracy to counter light vehicle play. The sniper long range snare + AT gun combo is just overkill against light vehicles(add to that engy mines). Yes OKW has a counter to the british sniper. Just because you don't know what the counter is doesn't mean it doesn't exist. It's called the puma. The vet 1 puma aimed shot ability one shots the british sniper 100% of the time. Oh, and before you cry that the puma can never get the shot off a british sniper , the puma outranges the british sniper and also has better SIGHT range than it. Puma hardcounters brit sniper. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Rate the Factions, Overall (1 being best and 5 worse)26 Oct 2015, 10:32 AM 1. USF 2. OST 3. SOV 4. BRITS 5. OKW In: Lobby
Thread: A couple USF suggestions..24 Oct 2015, 11:21 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Oct 2015, 10:54 AMMaschinengewehr Yeah we have to wait for the Pershing. But we can't just base decisions around a new and popular unit. I disagree regarding the Sherman and Jackson. Jackson has the same range as the Jagdpanzer. Guess who wins that fight? Shermans just need a slight armour buff alongside a small cost increase like I mentioned. Then they're fine. No they don't. Both the sherman and jackson are fine. Sherman got a handy pen buff a few patches ago, and jackson has always been good. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: A couple USF suggestions..24 Oct 2015, 10:33 AM I think that after oct 29 patch, all USF units will finally be in the spot where they need to be. Except m8 greyhound and M3 ht, but overall USF will be well balanced. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: What in the world happened to emplacements? 24 Oct 2015, 07:18 AM They got a massive overnerf due to community over reaction. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Patch notes 29 Oct23 Oct 2015, 19:33 PM Heat Shell ability no longer uses the artillery collision type Heat Shell ability now uses the proper speed and acceleration values This change is huge. This alone makes elite armored way more viable as now heat shells wont smash into the ground 90% of the time and actually be good. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Patch notes 29 Oct23 Oct 2015, 18:41 PM Good job relic. The amount of bug fixes alone is alone to warrant a +1 In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: T-34-85 is underperforming23 Oct 2015, 16:04 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Oct 2015, 15:24 PMatouba 1.But T3485 has 800HP while M4C has 640, it means a lot. 2.T4 cost doesn't need to be touched. It's fine comepared to USF/OH tech cost. 3.TBH I feel all the medium call-ins should be locked at tech buildings. The M4C shouldn't be an exception. 4.T3 units are pretty good, that's why T4 is almost never built. No. The reason that T4 is never built is that T4 is far far too expensive in manpower and fuel to an extent. The t-34/76 is the worst medium tank in the game, and is locked behind so many tech structures that it isin't even funny. Its the same problem with ost T4. Only difference is that once you get to OST 4, you actually get decent units like panther, pwerfer. Soviets get the crappy su-85, the mediocre katyusha, and the shitty t-34/76. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: CoH Korea22 Oct 2015, 19:19 PM Not going to happen. First due to how sensitive this is it in asia and would probably end up being banned in most of asia, and especially in china, which is a very big PC market these days. And also given how relic handled the campaign of coh 2 i wouldn't be surprised if it would portray north koreans and chinese as baby eaters and US troops as saints. This is the same reason we dont see games about the far east mostly. The japanese vs china conflict was extremelly brutal and caused about 20 million chinese deaths and it was to the pacific like the eastern front was to the western front. But because of nationalistic sentiments the game would probably end up being banned in china and japan, and possibly other asian countries as well. Hearts of Iron series is already banned in china, and that's okay for a niche game like hearts of iron, not okay for a mainstream RTS like coh 2. In: Lobby
Thread: Relic Stream - October 2122 Oct 2015, 17:33 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Oct 2015, 17:26 PMelchino7 It has the same armor as the Tiger at 300 M26/PV/Tiger HP: 800/800(960)/1040 Armor: 300/320(352)/300 Movement Speed: 6/6.6/4.7 Acceleration: 2/2.4/1.5 Deceleration: 4/4.5/1.8 Damage: 160/160/160 Penetration: 220/240/260 vs Equal vs -20pen across board Accuracy: 0.035/0.045/0.06 vs 0.03/0.06 vs 0.025/0.05 Reload: 5.5/6.25/5 Real RoF: 5.75/7.5/5.25 Radius: 4/0.5/3.5 We still missing scatter and AoE profile MP: 600/490/640 Fuel: 230/175/230 It doesn't have a vehicle crew and it seems it has AP shells. Why not 900hp (survives an extra AT gun shot) or cut down fuel cost (not mp) to 210f. Keep in mind that the pershing also has the very strong combined arms ability, which gives the tank EXTRA range essentially giving it 60 range and 60 sight range, and its special ability is not an AP shell, but a piercing shot that pierces buildings. Like ISU-152 piercing shot. Jacksons with more than 60 + range + self sight , ouch. The commander is going to have alot of lategame power. Overall i can't believe some people think the pershing will be bad. The pershing is suprisingly perfectly balanced and its stats are just right. They fit in the american design of fragile, mobile and hard hitting very well. In: COH2 Gameplay