Profile of Burts

Feuersturm is pretty dumb taking into account this term is used to describe allied bombing runs on German Cities during WW2.

Cavarly makes no sense since the commander has nothing 'Cavalry' like in it like a halftrack

Actually, cavarly does make sense. Kind of given that mechanized cavarly was reffered as to halftracks and other light vehicles. So heavy cavarly does make some sense, atleast somewhat.

Fuerstrum indeed is just cheesy.

You want to missunderstand me. I said the word "no" to your logic.
CoH1 is not p2w, cause when I bought it, I simply bought tales of valor and got everything coh offers for multiplayer.

No faction should be UP do the other one. They should be sold in one package.

Umm, vcoh and opposing fronts can also be bought seperately. And in one pack. Same thing with coh 2. Go select all commanders, add to cart, all expansions, add to cart, boom one package.

Sorry, but your definition of P2W seems to be completely off. P2W and a game sold in one package are not the same things at all. You seem to be arguing that games shouldn't have expansion packs, not about P2W.


What about that guy who bought only vcoh and doesnt have access to PE or Brits? Is coh 1 p2w for him?

So can we actually agree that I never said I will quit this game a year ago and all I do was comparing how CS:GO DLC never affect the gameplay?

Blizzard actually does the same way as Company of Heroes: Opposing Fronts: They DO release DLC but they are BIG EXPANSION that:

- Has Singleplay Campaign.
- Bring change to Multiplayer.

In a way, those Expansions are Stand-alone game like Company of Heroes: Opposing Fronts! ( I know heart of the swarm required the base version of Starcraft 2 but hey, at least they listen to the fanbase and make the Legacy of the Void become a stand alone expansion yeah ?. They also have flaw but they listen to their fans and change )

--------------------------------------------

When I said P2W you have to SEE when the new commanders got release: Most of them are very good and can be easily expoilt:

- Do you remember about the Tiger Ace commander?
- Remember how good Soviet Industry was?
- Ever feel the Ostruppen spam, capture every house?
- Do your men feel the power of Obersodation with their MG34 cut your Rifleman + Conscript in half?
- do your men turn into BBQ when those crocodile tanks coming in and burn everything and get away with the heavy armor ?
- Elite Rifleman doctrine that let you be able to get Vet rifleman right away when the game start?


After sometimes when the Dev can't milk those DLC anymore then they start to make adjustment to the game ( patch ) .





You are 100% right. Relic choose the path of release DLC and after 2 years of keeping up with them, I have choose to delete the game even after spending so much money into it.

And delete Company of Heroes 2 was a tough choice because this is the only WW2 Strategy competitive game that I ever know but I rather delete it once and for all, never think about it again than tried to stick it to the end and always complaint about it.

Those 1.200$ could actually be the money I willing to spend on COH2 if they make good expansion like COH1 expansion but nah.

Yes industry and tiger ace were op. So? Shock rifle and CAS is OP now, and they are the strongest commanders, and YET they ARE FREE.

Ostruppen OP? WTF?
Croc is nerfed next patch.

At this point you just seem to be crying that you can't counter something and because its a paid commander you scream p2w.

Oh and btw, even were obersoldaten were considered to be overpowered ( of course they were) allies with guard motor or shock rifle (both free commanders) still had a better win-rate than OKW .

Yes, I said that all right but did I ever mention that I quit + Delete Company of Heroes 2? No because at that time, I still play COH2 but casually and focus more on CS:GO

Please don't get me wrong but that post express how much better CS:GO DLC doesn't affect gameplay as much as Company of Heroes 2 DLC ( In a mocking way about COH 2 )

Yes, the DLC policy is terrible. And? Heartstone has a similar system, except that it's free to play. You can buy cards for money or you can play enough to get them.

Or you know, the whole SC 2 bullshit where blizzard makes you pay 40$ for a couple of units IN EVERY expansion. And still they somehow manage to mess it up. (Swarm host meta, etc etc)


But because it's blizzard, it's fine


Meanwhile coh 2 actually does it alot better and still allows you to play with everyone even if you just bought 1 faction.

Oh and btw because apparently you were once a top 50 1v1 player it boggles my mind how you think this game is still P2W.

The 2 best commanders for SOV/OST are free. CAS and Shock Rifle. USF stock commanders are great as well.

Oh and btw relic is doing a much better job balancing stuff than they did in coh 1. Look at how comparatively quickly commandos, croc, bofors, AVRE, centuar and other bullshit is getting fixed.

In coh 1 after opposing fronts was released relic left the broken PE and Brit bullshit for months. So its definately improving.

Meanwhile in CS GO volvo releases cz-75 and it is ridiciluosly broken for months until they nerf it to uselessnes, and then buff it back again to a point where it is actually good. But hey, skins

k thx bai.


Last time i checked you were saying the exact same blabber over a year ago. So i dont understand the reason of this thread, other than to cause more drama.


Yes the DLC policy is terrible, i don't see why exactly that means that coh 2 sucks and can't be played competitevely.

CS GO has plenty of flaws.

Alot of the guns have been useless and have seen no use in competitive play ever since they were released.. (AUG, m249, negev, duallies to an extent)

And the boring M4/AK-47 + 1 awp meta has sticked around for ever.