Profile of braciszek

HYPE FOR TEH BRITS

I think if you swap the su76 with the t70 there is no reason to go t3
T70 is so much better at killing infantry than the t34 and in fact I'd say t70 scales much better than the t34 due to the sight adn speed.
Light vehicles can be dealt with zis atguns and the su85 can take over that role later on in the game.
2 specialist units are better than 2 generalist units
Sherman + Jackson is better than 2 eazy esights
t70 + su85 is better than t34 + su76

Coupled with the fact that the katyusha is one of the best indirect fire units while the m5 is less used.

No, I htink the su76 needs more health and faster cooldown on the barrage. 400hp seems fine

And then a panzer iv flanks your su-85 and the rest of your tier is toast. Its bad design that T3 lacks reliable AT and T4 has a handicapped unit that is too alike the other two units.

Spamming generalist units has its weaknesses and strengths as does a specialist army. Usually if you choose T3 or T4, you STILL have to rely on a commander to fill in the gaps. T3 and T4 have to be viable and useful without too much commander support, or the call in meta will never end, even if you cripple call ins.

It depends on the play-style and how you use units; that would be a better design of Soviet T3/4.

UGH please no officers or anything that provides any bonuses for putting units near each other...

-

http://www.wwiiequipment.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=75:17-pounder-anti-tank-gun&catid=40:anti-tank&Itemid=58

If we did indeed had historical accuracy, then the Tiger II would practically have twice the protection of th Tiger I (of course ignoring the logistical issues of that tank) - I would hope that Brits didnt have any more weapon penetration as usual - a 77mm High Velocity gun being nearly good as the panthers (if Relic actually decides to make the Comet), the 17 pounder being about as good as pak40 (debatable, but the game still has its parameters).

The main point being the British actually having a good amount of sufficient options - and rightfully priced for them. Some would say the 76mm gun of the Americans is superior to the 17 pounder (at least that of a firefly) for the superior RoF and accuracy, while only having a little less penentration, but during the war, the British had a LOT more 17 pounders than the Americans had 76mm guns. The British were making loads of 17 pounder ammuntion while America had extremely low HVAP production. The US Military also deemed the 17 pounder inferior to the 90mm (though many could argue otherwise)

Point being Brit tanks would be expensive and consist of a diverse arsenal of well-rounded options compared to the US with its only proper AT being the Jackson.

Then Relic releases 1942 Brits and 2 pounders must flank panzer IV's Kappa

Only under a certain condition such as the above suggestion or similar ^

Spending manpower and only benefitting yourself is better than someone spending manpower and everyone benefitting.

As in, that is more agreeable to have allowed...

Nothing that undermines T2 conversion, and preferably something that only helps the owner.

- 95mm Centaur variant (SpART; possibly Brumbar-like)

Cromwell VI, which is basically the same thing except more of these were produced. Yeah, it would be a turreted Brummbar minus the armor but faster. Would be cool...