Profile of ferwiner

Funny thing is that best armoured (frontally) american vehicle was... Jackson. I believe it was greatly harmed by taking out it's armour in game, it should be more like panther in function, sth between tank and tank destroyer that is fast and has great frontal armour, but it's rear armour is like the one in m20 and other light vevicles (as it was irl, killable by mg AP rounds) and with short range gun (sic!) as it had really bad accurancy, much worse than in tiger for example. Basically jackson is the oposite of tiger (that has gun with great accurancy and mostly same armour from any direction). And that is real type of usf's heavy vehicle.
Pershing on the other hand is nothing more than a copy of a tiger (with some things than better like speed and sloped armour and other worse like the gun but mostly worth the same) introduced when tiger, and tanks of it's kind were worth much less than in 1942 (when tiger was introduced) as there were tons of better ideas on how to build tanks (like panther, tiger2, IS2, IS3, T44 and so on) at the time.
And of course Jumbo is just a quick fix of us armoured forces that had no well armoured vehicles at the beginning, just like m10 was quick fix for no penetration.

Gamewise Jumbo should be added to act like kv-1: old tank that can lead the charge with its armour. It can be used in multiple doctrines.

Preshing could be added to but only if the doctrine was either like soviet industry: so usa had less manpower in early game while waiting for pershing, just to make it only able to defend, not attack, or it can be like a tiger ace doctrine so there would be only one (there were not many of them in europe, there were even more german ace crews that fought on the front than pershings i belive) and using it would kill your income.

And of course if changes would be applied to Jackson so it could act as it really was the hellcat could have it's actual place as a long range (it was more accurate) fast, ambush tank destroyer with not much armour.

I was just joking around. I do agree with Romeo. I think the current system is okay, but some useless abilities and OP vet changes need to be reworked.

I do realize it was a joke but such joke still somewhat changes what people are discussing, just wanted to prevent instead of having to cure

skill treez! Politically correct romance subplots! All three mass effect endings! RPG elements!

Maybe AA will have 8 endings? Kappa

Basically I will support almost every idea thet will conclude in diverifying coh2 gamplay as it is way to repetitive right now.

I'm sure it's easier to tweak the current system, and this is huge advantage of it but the system that allows to get vet in such an easy manner ends up with units that get less and less significant vet bonuses from one ballance patch to another and that makes gameplay really flat. If you've played the original coh2 beta you can see that all the units had much more significant vet bonuses back then, the same happend to doctrinal units, and same slowly begins to happen with WFA added units.

Yeah, it happens sometimes when patch or sth else changes your leadout while game is turned off, you just need to put right commanders before going into game as choosing one always leads to heaving no-ability commander.