Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Ostheer Feedback3 Apr 2021, 20:38 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2021, 20:33 PMcomm_ash Why would you drop 3 healing crates at the frontline, when you likely only need 1 to buff the squads up there. Because the buff stacks 3 times. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Late game performances of Volksgrenadiers and veterancy3 Apr 2021, 19:50 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2021, 19:29 PMjagd wölfe They don't, they have far better RA than Volks That is exclusively at vet3, up until that point they have low dps and bad ra. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - OKW Feedback3 Apr 2021, 19:07 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2021, 18:59 PMWittmann39 Don't worry mate, at least I am playing the game already You have to show me a sentence that Sander writes "221 must be defeated by the Vickers UC", as you already mentioned. Otherwise, I have nothing to discuss with a troll. I've asked multiple times, what makes you think comparing stats of 221 and UC that 221 should stand any chance? I've already said it will win when it flanks. You haven't said a single reason why it should win frontally or even compete. I've told you how to find the quote. If you're too lazy to do research, don't discuss the topic and let adults talk. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - OKW Feedback3 Apr 2021, 18:43 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2021, 18:41 PMWittmann39 mate I asked for a reference and you just defining the game the way you want. Anyway, I have to start a charity to raise funds to buy a copy of COH2 for you. Without playing the game, you cant differentiate between units. I'm at least 17% convinced you are capable of putting "221" and "sander" into google yourself. If you do you'll find a quote about helping vs infantry, hunting snipers and assisting with LVs, not destroying them frontally. Also, from the way you've written this post, didn't you confused 221(AI only) with 222(AI and AT) by a chance? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - General Feedback3 Apr 2021, 18:18 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2021, 18:15 PMTiger Baron Sure. Remove the best known and most popular tank of WW2 from 4 commanders and gut Ostheer's core doctrine choice. Why the hell not. All for the sake of "muh diversity". It will make it more unique and desirable, because it won't be all over the place, being a common unit. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: COH2stats.com match and player statistics 2.03 Apr 2021, 17:31 PM Looks great, that'll be helpful for everyone. In: Lobby
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Soviet Feedback3 Apr 2021, 17:16 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2021, 16:57 PMChukiki About the Soviet Industry commander: Replace kv2 with Il2-precision Bombing Strike replace kv8 with T34/85 It has nothing good vs infantry or artillery 1. Yes it has a KV8 but it is pretty useless late game when the enemy has massive Anti tank infantry panthers and paks. Kv2? same issue. And it underperforms anyways. 2. It has nothing that can fight Howitzers. When the Germans spam Howitzers its GG. U cant get close, u have no artillery strikes and no own artillery. Since this commander has quite a lot of weaknesses due to underperforming tanks and nothing to counter artillery for I wanna ask to give soviet industry artillery strike to take out the opponents artillery. The commander has already nothing good vs infantry so give it at least the artillery strike to counter Howitzers. I also sugguest replacing the underwhelming kv8 wiht the T34/85 since u appearantly refuse to buff him. i discussed the kv8 wiht some of my friends and we all share the same opinion that it is not a great tank. And none of us ever bothers uses it because of it. THe T34/85 is better at killing infantry. Yes it is. It kills instantly, instead of slowly reducing the squads health. For 145 fuel and being an ONLY anti-infantry tank u expect the tank to perform better. KV-2 does not underperform in any way... You may be using it wrong, but it is very good unit that murders infantry and fends off tanks below panther. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Late game performances of Volksgrenadiers and veterancy3 Apr 2021, 17:15 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2021, 16:49 PMZeroZeroNi what??? Rangers/Paras/Sections +25 Volks/Rifles/Mandos have +30 Grens/PG/Storms/Ass grens/Obers/Cons/Ass Guards/Shocks have +40 to my knowledge the only 2 units with +56 are Penals and Fallschrimjaeger. You missed the point like B-4 misses the target. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - OKW Feedback3 Apr 2021, 16:57 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2021, 16:48 PMPip Cool, still irrelevant though. "Intended role of a unit as designed and balanced around by people responsible for it is irrelevant" Ok. This would be meaningful if the 221 were a t0 unit, but it isnt; it comes at tier 1, just like the British 6 pounder, Sniper, and AEC. The brit has access to similar AT options to OKW at the 221 timing, the fact the Rak comes at tier 0 has absolutely no bearing on the 221/3 vs the UC. No, it does not. Not even close. Combat is the primary role of the 221, and honestly even the 223. The 221 gains armour with the 223 upgrade, if it's "Primary role" was to just be a cache, why would its combat performance improve with the upgrade, and why are the first three levels of veterancy for the unit focused around making it more combat-capable? No, it is not. Healing on field and assisting infantry against other infantry in cover is. Lockdown is what the 221/3 transitions into after the Light Vehicle phase ends, it isnt it's "primary purpose", as building a 221, immediately turning it into a 223, and then immediately locking down a sector is not an efficient use of the unit. But the UC is? Yes. Its very much supposed to fight against anything below 222. It has stats to do just that and upgrade that makes it even better. It also does not provide any utility, its not needed as a transport and not a single soul ever uses it as such and it loses that ability when upgraded. Contrary to ost, UKF does not have long range "fausts" and contrary to OKW, USF does not have T0 ATG. I do hope you realise that just because you say something is true, this doesn't actually make it the case? The UC's intended targets are similarly infantry, It's an AI vehicle primarily, which is rather supported by the fact it can upgrade into a flamethrower. It has two AI upgrade paths. Yes. UCs primary role is fighting infantry. Its secondary is to keep axis ultra lights away from tommies, because otherwise its free, uncounterable attrition damage. And if you still have any doubts about 221 role, go ask Sander or Miragefla. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Late game performances of Volksgrenadiers and veterancy3 Apr 2021, 16:38 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2021, 16:29 PMZeroZeroNi Dude, Penal havelike +56% weapon acc at vet 3. It's no joke. They'd be even more broken compared to LMG para's. And its less then regular vet+weapon upgrade. In: COH2 Balance