Profile of Katitof

If one profile has to change that is of the SVT.

And its one profile that will not be changed, because there is no reason to, its a unique profile in the context of the army, giving unit a unique role and nothing else really matters here, other factions weapons are completely irrelevant.

This goes for G43 as well, it couldn't be any less relevant what other factions have, only what the weapon can offer within the faction it is.

What about giving g43 grens diversion or whatever the officer ability is that gives fire on the move accuracy and a target size reduction? Or something similar at least as an active ability instead of a flat rec acc boost. Then the upgrade can still be a cheap alternative to the lmg at the cost of more active usage required.

That would overstep into G43 upgrade.

But a new ability could be the way to go.
Something akin to HTD maybe? Lowered accuracy, small rec acc bonus, immobilize, suppression immunity?

Yes UKF seem to be low. It is also worth noting that:

The number of game with UKF is simply very low at that level. (893 game total)

There is huge difference when including only 200+ and the all games with the UKF/OKW increasing the difference from 0.2% to 6%.

This might be an indication that although UKF are weak they are strong vs OKW.

You really are going overboard with mental gymnastics to bend statistics into your narrative.

Perhaps its time to accept that OKW is much stronger then UKF and is on pair with other factions, while UKF is rock bottom instead of attempting to manipulate narrative that can't be contested here?

There is no "hidden OP" here, sample size of almost 900 games is large enough to be accurate and there is no skill disparity games taken into account that would influence win ratios.

UKF is UP, OKW is not, accept reality and cope.

42.6% on 1v1
40.3% on 2v2

is that still low but fairly in the range of statistically acceptable...?

5% deviation from perfect outcome of 50% would be acceptable, anything higher then that I would call is an indicator of imbalance.

These ratios only confirm why UKF is dead on competitive scene.

Name a few, and let me know how they're different from one another in as dramatic a way as the G43s are.

PTRS.
Guards one actually hits and kills infantry.

USF carbine vs elite carbine.

Soviet guard mosin is actually good on the move as well as long range, while con mosin is mid/close range primarily(yes, you can use it at long range too, but we're talking scenarios, where you wouldn't lose more then gain from engagement).

Weapon crews have completely different curve then their mainline equivalents.

LMGs behave very different when used on certain elite infantries(either massive performance boost, as with ober 34 or firing on the move which is not possible for regular infantry).

There is also BOYS AT rifle which behaves completely different on sniper and completely different on AT tommy section.

That would be couple of examples of the top of my head.

Flamethrowers behave completely different depending if infantry uses them or vehicle.

I'm not sure why you think pointless inconsistency and lack of explanation by the game is fine because "You should just know it".

Just because you don't see the point, doesn't mean its pointless. It simply means you lack the capacity to grasp broader picture.
But don't worry, this is exactly why forums exist, if you ever feel confused again, post a thread in strategy section and someone will explain to you how things work and you will no longer be confused.

Do you honestly think that most players just inherently "know" all of these inconsistent quirks? People on this very forum are constantly mistaken as to how the G43 in particular even acts.

I think most players who actually use them in game quickly get the grasp of what the weapon can do, you'd have to be exceptionally smooth brain nugget to not tell the difference between gren G43 and sniper G43, I mean sure, there are people who can't tell, but game isn't exactly balanced with intellectual amoebas in mind.

Give me one good reason for any of this to be the case.

Different troops with different purpose on the battlefield used same weapons.
Not every unique unit got snowflake fallshirmjeager treatment in ww2, where they got unique snowflake weapon designed just for them.
All, front line grenadiers, cannon fodder volksgrenadiers and snipers used both Kar98s and G43s.

So not only it makes complete sense why different units would use same weapons but use them in different ways, its hostoricaly accurate as a cherry on top.

So two (Three, the JLI and Sniper variants are still very different despite both being "Sniper" rifles) totally different types of weapon depending on how many you happen to be holding.

Yes, just like weapon crews and elite infantry bar one or two have different weapons then regular infantry.