Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: COH2 winter balance mod - discussion5 Feb 2020, 13:04 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Feb 2020, 13:02 PMSpanky Just an idea, Brace for british emplacements costs munition but lasts a bit longer and can still fire but at a lower rate, say 50% ? The munition cost doesn't need to be expensive, but investing munitions into bracing your emplacement makes it still viable. Thoughts? Makes as much sense as slapping muni cost on retreat button for infantry. Was also discussed to death couple of years ago. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: G43's are simply OP5 Feb 2020, 11:02 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Feb 2020, 10:25 AMVipper Soviets have non vehicle recon option like: Flares Sniper tracking specialized doctrinal infatry And ost has sniper, interrogation, pios and specialized doctrinal infantry. Still main recon, most accessible, offering most to the table and easiest to use units are vehicles. Your point? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tank Destroyer Poll5 Feb 2020, 10:21 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Feb 2020, 09:51 AMJibberJabberJobber Tank traps can't be crushed, you must be thinking of CoH1. Probably. Never really had much use of them in CoH2 outside of makeshift sandbag and they don't really stop anything, just delay it a bit. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tank Destroyer Poll5 Feb 2020, 08:50 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Feb 2020, 08:38 AMSupremeStefan Usf is the only faction with non doctrinal tank traps so its not true that usf have only jackson for late game. Heavy tanks and panthers roll over them like they were grass, they don't work above P4. Argument still stands. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: G43's are simply OP5 Feb 2020, 08:49 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Feb 2020, 08:10 AMJibberJabberJobber Ostheer's recon units have 42 sight (G43 Storms/Pgrens, Pio's, JCS) instead of 50. Ost recon is vehicle based, just like soviet. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF Sherman 76 skin inconsistency5 Feb 2020, 07:31 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Feb 2020, 07:30 AMUnit G17 But, as I pointed out, Ardennes Assault reward skins DO work on them for example! Its not the same tank. Campaign units are separate category with separate stats. MP 76mm is soviet originally. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: USF Sherman 76 skin inconsistency5 Feb 2020, 07:27 AM Long story short: Skins are bound to faction the unit originates from and can't be applied to whatever unit if you switch ownership. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: USF Sherman 76 skin inconsistency4 Feb 2020, 23:34 PM Because its soviet lend lease sherman originally, it wasn't intended to be USFs, but it became so when modders introduced new commanders. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Winter balance (1/2020) feedback OKW4 Feb 2020, 21:58 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Feb 2020, 21:34 PMVipper Another quote completely out of topic. Risk and reward is totally irrelevant to doctrinal units access. Itis your "time to move on." All I'm saying is: If you don't like not being able to produce a unit that has certain, UNIVERSAL requirement, then plan ahead instead of YOLO'ing and then complaining like you do right now. Its relevant. Not my problem that you're getting your trucks wrecked by arty in 4 digit rank 4v4s. Present tech requierment for THE most gamebreaking and problematic category of units is well justified by the impact and ease of use these vehicles provide. Don't want to lose access to it? Don't build trucks forward. There is very little benefit to it nowadays. In: Lobby
Thread: Winter balance (1/2020) feedback OKW4 Feb 2020, 21:10 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Feb 2020, 20:23 PMVipper You are confusing consistency and faction design. Each faction has its own trademark and OKW being able to built outside their base is one of their trademarks. If OKW losing a T4 should deny their Tiger, then USF Major who comes with allot of utility should have an added 90 fuel cost and be required to be alive to call-in a Pershing... Bottom line is that requiring T4 to call-in a JT or Tiger does not have to with balancing OKW that still have access to KT but has to do with the respective commanders and denying access to this units is not a good way to balance these commanders. So is risk vs reward management. If you're building it outside of base sector, you've evaluated that immediate gain is worth the long term risk for you and concede the right to complain when you lose the truck. If you feel like its too much risk for you to handle, don't build it forward. Is losing access to units worth keeping that noob away from that one point, knowing he will eventually nuke it with arty? That's personal question to answer, not balance or design problem. So that leaves only consistency. Sorry, special snowflaking for OKW ended about 3 years ago, time to move on. In: Lobby