Profile of Katitof

Thompsons Paras still can't get bazookas from the rack which seems like a bug. But i gotta say that i'd prefer to see them with stickies instead of a bazooka upgrade (but still letting them get the one on the rack like anyone)

Why would it be a bug?
Just because weapon doesn't drop it doesn't mean it doesn't take weapon slot.
Except ppsh, but ppsh are like half of the weapon anyway(worse then thompsons by a long shot).

If it came fully crewed, would you drop it on a flank or behind enemy lines? You'd be gifting them an AT gun + Exp.


Being uncrewed does not cancel the point of a paradrop. The point is convenience, not having to use build ime + move time to the front. Just insta-gun! Drop it near your ambulance, crew it and reinforce.



Stil, this commander has some weak point. No sniper-crits on pathfinders?

I don't believe the commander is weak.

Its not suitable for team games and maybe even 2v2, but its solid in 1v1 if you go T1, M20+greyhound and bazookas.

I would like to use paradrop on the backlines, because I believe that is the purpose of paradrop in the first place. The AT gun prevents me. I am either donating it to enemy if I want to use them behind the lines or I'm severely crippling my ability to defend it if I have to sacrifice half of para squad to crew it. Having another squad there first before the drop completely kills the point of paradrop, because why would I want it, if I need to flank/get behind anyway first and I could do that with cheaper rifles?

If I was to drop it near ambulance, why would I pick the doctrine over airborne in the first place that allows for superior paratroopers and doesn't enforce me to get AT gun?

Pathfinders are fine, they deliver deadly arty barrage that doesn't have huge delay as major one they could be 4 man squad thou.

Umm, the last graphic didn't showed any population, but win loss ratio.
Nothing more.

And guess what? To have win loss ration you need to include the games that were played.

And guess what again? The graph, for obvious reasons do not include people that were sitting in the que.

We never had any population difference graph. Only the one showing win-loss ratio difference and THAT was more or less balanced(except for the part where it was over 60% wins for axis, which was the bigges fluke in the graph and that spike in german favor was during march deployment failure).

And last but not least-where was still 2 to 1 or 3 to 1 whine threads difference with more being whined about soviets when the graph showed almost 50% win loss ratio.

What is the conclusion there? Simple. More numerous clueless noobs of more numerous faction. If you had played the game, you'd noticed permanent 10:90%-30:70% search ratios in favor of axis constantly except late night where everyone sleeps.

Its not really a secret that much more players play axis therefore much more noobs are within them due to sheer population disparity between armies and thats why you always have twice as many whine threads about about "allies op axis up" then the other way even when the graphs show 1:1 win loss ration in general.

Please, feel free to elaborate on that as the conclusion is rather simple.

Its definately better than crossing in the woods.

I would seriously argue that.