Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Laser-Homing AT Grenades and Rifle Grenades31 Jul 2014, 12:42 PM Jump back to quoted post31 Jul 2014, 12:12 PMJ1N6666 Katy, were vehicles hit by Pzfausts in vCOH? Sure they were, but not everyone had to count on blind opponent or PE ATHT to immobilize it first. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Increase the OKW T4 AA-gun efficiency on air targets31 Jul 2014, 12:03 PM It already creates a no go zone for most units and armor. No need for it to create iron curtain above as well. You want AA? Get AA vehicle, as all other factions. OKW flak halftruck seems THE best AA in game to me and its not like T4 truck does a bad job either. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Laser-Homing AT Grenades and Rifle Grenades31 Jul 2014, 11:33 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Jul 2014, 10:58 AMOZtheWiZARD You can adjust animation to compensate for this. Dota 2 uses this system for majority of its stuns and it works. Dota2 doesn't have random soldiers dancing and prancing before they execute your command. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: IS-2 Frontal Armor 31 Jul 2014, 10:41 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Jul 2014, 10:31 AMBulgakov Because Propaganda. If you've seen the documents, it means they were written to be seen, which means it's not objective information. Don't search for objective truth in Soviet or Nazi historical documents. You will rarely find it there. Yea.... because soviets have used propaganda to destroy tigers. Why they have made anything heavier then T34 in the first place if propaganda was such a good anti tank weapon? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Laser-Homing AT Grenades and Rifle Grenades31 Jul 2014, 10:28 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Jul 2014, 06:10 AMJ1N6666 Would rather have them all gain range but lose homing. And no vehicle was ever hit again. Forgot already how it was for rifles and panzerfusiliers? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: IS-2 Frontal Armor 30 Jul 2014, 22:01 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Jul 2014, 21:47 PMCardboard Tank The thing is that sideshots bounce off from it on a regular basis. Flanking is part of the game. Useless on IS-2s. And why do you repeat this? Its a common knowledge since alpha that there is NO side armor in CoH2, only front half and rear half. You want to flank successfully? Get on its rear as T34s have to do against Tigers and Elephants. Bringing up the T-34/76 which is hardly supposed to fight versus tanks is stupid. T-34/85s - which are more or less in the role of a Panzer IV - will make short process of any Tiger. In pairs, with mark target and possible guard button. That is hardly a 1v1 scenario nor Tiger should fight alone like, ever. More so, German AT should deal with heavy tanks. After all Russian AT deals with German tanks easily. "Wehraboo" you call it, while you are just looking for Soviet sided balance. Why should German AT not go through IS-2s armor? After all Soviet AT units (Zis and Su-85 and even the T34/85) go through the Tiger, despite failing to do so historically. So no reason why German AT should struggle to take down Russian tanks. And it does with the same or greater efficiency as allied AT deals with german heavies. And no, russian AT doesn't deal easily with german armor, in every single case you need to use 2 to 1 numbers or combined arms. And if you want historical accuracy, well, there you have it, IS-2 had superior armor to Tiger and inferior to King Tiger, which is accurately portrayed in the game. Why the conviction that german AT should always penetrate and only german tanks should bounce shells off? IS-2 is heaviest armor allies have, it doesn't have as much punch as Tiger, but can take slightly more punishment. Its balanced this way. I know its hard to accept the fact that allies might have something that isn't made of paper, but thats how it is and thats how it will stay. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Comparison of Kat & Stuka after heavy usage30 Jul 2014, 21:30 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Jul 2014, 21:21 PMBulgakov More is needed. Needs both a damage reduction and cooldown reduction. Why should soviets have 1-minute mobile arty but noone else? Especially when soviets have the best of all the doctrine artillery as well? Ekh tsk tsk. You might want to build panzerwerfer and see how it works this patch. You'll be surprised. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Comparison of Kat & Stuka after heavy usage30 Jul 2014, 21:17 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Jul 2014, 08:03 AMBartonPL Katiusha was a big piece of rubbish before this patch, now it's OP because Relic decided to increase damage to 160, in my opinion 120 damage is enought for katiusha to be a proper arty unit Exactly. Nothing more is needed. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Comparison of Kat & Stuka after heavy usage30 Jul 2014, 21:16 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Jul 2014, 21:11 PMVon Sturm The kat buff was the last utter relic BS. Seriously WHY THE HELL SOVIET NEEDS THAT BUFF ? Pre patch katiusha: Do you see now why? It desperately needed buff. If they overdid it is a whole different topic. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: IS-2 Frontal Armor 30 Jul 2014, 21:00 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Jul 2014, 20:19 PMCardboard Tank Still, the frontal armor issue with the IS-2 doesn´t seem to be that uncommon. In that engagement a lone IS-2 escapes the crossfire of a King Tiger, Raketenwerfer and Schreck - sidehits on short range included. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aiaIlJmrJ14&list=UUyUcNdOxXcVt3o9eZKdza9w#t=30m0s And why do you believe its an issue? Soviets can't have heavily armored tanks? Its german only privilege? Armor is fine, you have have over 50% to penetrate it with dedicated AT and your heavy AT have 100%. Pretty much the same is when allies go against german heavies with inferior AT. In: COH2 Balance