Why would anybody want Rifle grenade / AT Grenade from OKW and US to be back normal when Panzerfaust/ Russian AT nade are all homing ?
Either you turn all those 4 thing back to COH1 mechanic or you turn them all into homing missle 100% hit.
You can't just : I would like my A and B to go to school and become doctor and C & D can become some lowlife.
Laser-Homing AT Grenades and Rifle Grenades
27 Jul 2014, 20:56 PM
#21
Posts: 322
27 Jul 2014, 23:34 PM
#22
Posts: 118
I'd rather have them all not homing.
 | Playercard of Juggernauth | |||||||||||||||
|
27 Jul 2014, 23:41 PM
#23
Posts: 379
I think its important to have a consistency as opposed to something like the 80% idea proposed. You already have penetration vs higher vehicles to make it random.
With the current system it makes it very easy to interpret the battlefield - does this unit have the ability to use an at weapon? Yes/No - Then I need to stay X distance away to avoid a hit.
They cost munis, and without them M3A1, Jeeps, and Scout Cars would dominate the early game.
With the current system it makes it very easy to interpret the battlefield - does this unit have the ability to use an at weapon? Yes/No - Then I need to stay X distance away to avoid a hit.
They cost munis, and without them M3A1, Jeeps, and Scout Cars would dominate the early game.
27 Jul 2014, 23:42 PM
#24
Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1
Im so glad its not like the coh1 faust which was basically useless. the current mechanics make the game less clicky-clicky micro orgy but rather focus on good positioning/using truesight/intelligent encircling
28 Jul 2014, 00:17 AM
#25
Posts: 1963 | Subs: 1
Im so glad its not like the coh1 faust which was basically useless. the current mechanics make the game less clicky-clicky micro orgy but rather focus on good positioning/using truesight/intelligent encirclingBut, what do you mean coh1 faust useless? I like it better than the currrent faust.
_____________________________________________________________________________
28 Jul 2014, 08:14 AM
#26
Posts: 48
I think they just do to much damage to light vehicles.
They we're used to blow tracks off vehicles and the like, there is no reason they should be doing half the health of a Skdfz 222.
They we're used to blow tracks off vehicles and the like, there is no reason they should be doing half the health of a Skdfz 222.
28 Jul 2014, 10:26 AM
#27
Posts: 752
Im ok with auto-hit.
The game has a degree of command lag, so auto-hit is sort of necessary compromise.
Just dont get into range in the first place.
The game has a degree of command lag, so auto-hit is sort of necessary compromise.
Just dont get into range in the first place.
"You are competitive if play to win and make efforts to improve." -Basilone
28 Jul 2014, 13:51 PM
#28
Posts: 1158
I just don't like that they go through buildings. That should cancel it or block the shot, so people have to at least put some thought into what they are doing.
29 Jul 2014, 12:16 PM by siuking666:
T34/76 is NOT a joke on my hands; Maybe on your hands you make it suck shit? but on me, No. I can kill a stug with a little micro, go toe to toe with a Panzer 4. Is it a joke? LOL T34/85 is apparently a very good tank. But no one says it "one hit wipe" or elefant penetration; up to a point i think this little medium tank just have too much health and too much firepower with that fuel cost.
30 Jul 2014, 22:44 PM
#29
Posts: 37
Increase the range...
Increase the damage...
Make it RNG like virtually everything else in the game?
Increase the damage...
Make it RNG like virtually everything else in the game?
31 Jul 2014, 00:21 AM
#30
Posts: 1384
I feel like rifle grenade and faust are balanced because they can be kited.
Hoorah + At grenade has always been supreme fucking bullshit.
I want an icon that says "hey, these guys have an AT weapon" or something at the very least.
Hoorah + At grenade has always been supreme fucking bullshit.
I want an icon that says "hey, these guys have an AT weapon" or something at the very least.
31 Jul 2014, 00:40 AM
#31
Posts: 440
Yeah...because games are won and lost because of a couple rifle nades....
31 Jul 2014, 00:50 AM
#32
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Yeah...because games are won and lost because of a couple rifle nades....
Mines wins game, don´t lose squads. If an AT Nade/Faust penetrates or not can be enough reason to determinate the result of a match.
My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
31 Jul 2014, 06:10 AM
#33
Posts: 306
Would rather have them all gain range but lose homing.
31 Jul 2014, 08:51 AM
#34
Posts: 1439
I'd prefer all AT snares were skill shots rather than lock on abilities. The same it was in CoH.
31 Jul 2014, 10:28 AM
#35
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Would rather have them all gain range but lose homing.
And no vehicle was ever hit again.
Forgot already how it was for rifles and panzerfusiliers?
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
31 Jul 2014, 10:58 AM
#36
Posts: 1439
And no vehicle was ever hit again.
Forgot already how it was for rifles and panzerfusiliers?
You can adjust animation to compensate for this. Dota 2 uses this system for majority of its stuns and it works.
31 Jul 2014, 11:33 AM
#37
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
You can adjust animation to compensate for this. Dota 2 uses this system for majority of its stuns and it works.
Dota2 doesn't have random soldiers dancing and prancing before they execute your command.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
31 Jul 2014, 12:12 PM
#38
Posts: 306
And no vehicle was ever hit again.
Forgot already how it was for rifles and panzerfusiliers?
Katy, were vehicles hit by Pzfausts in vCOH?
31 Jul 2014, 12:42 PM
#39
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Katy, were vehicles hit by Pzfausts in vCOH?
Sure they were, but not everyone had to count on blind opponent or PE ATHT to immobilize it first.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
31 Jul 2014, 17:11 PM
#40
15 Posts: 1970 | Subs: 5
the PE AT grenade was the ONLY anti-vehicle 'skill shot' in CoH, and that is precisely why that faction also had access to treadbreak.
| Playercard of Romeo | |||||||||||||||||||
|
0 user is browsing this thread:
Livestreams
 |
|
|
16 | ||
 |
|
|
16 | ||
 |
|
|
5 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.41662.870+14
- 2.659233.739+2
- 3.299158.654+3
- 4.286110.722-2
- 5.309114.730+5
- 6.12243.739-1
- 7.193100.659+3
- 8.10829.788+9
- 9.370283.567+3
- 10.1171650.643+2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
13
Download
1315
Board Info
867 users are online:
867 guests
0 post in the last 24h
19 posts in the last week
45 posts in the last month
19 posts in the last week
45 posts in the last month
Registered members: 51669
Welcome our newest member, Wnukowskit
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Wnukowskit
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM