Profile of ThoseDeafMutes

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1026

General Information


Thread: Jackson needs a slight buff11 Jan 2015, 21:34 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Jan 2015, 11:24 AMausterlitz Thats team games where resources allow fielding of multiple panthers.In low levelk games it would be end. IS2 + SU85 are also possible in 1v1 duder. And if there's enough fuel for Jacksons + Pershing, the Axis player should have enough fuel to get out stuff to deal with that. Or they don't even need fuel because Panzershreks will annihilate any Jackson caught out of position. If they've sunk 200 fuel into a Pershing that means they haven't sunk it into Shermans and Scotts to deal with infantry blobs that are such a heavy part of the meta right now. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Jackson needs a slight buff11 Jan 2015, 08:17 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Jan 2015, 07:05 AMausterlitz As long as building pershing locks out jackson i'm good.Pershing meatshield in front with jackson kiting from back is OP. Almost as unstoppable as jacksons kiting from behind an IS2. Except that Axis still somehow dominate team games despite this. Or SU85s behind an IS2 in a 1v1, which we already have. Or Jagdpanzers / panthers behind a KT in team game modes. Or Panthers with tigers. It is not implicitly unbalanced to have both an effective TD and a meat shield tank in the same faction. In fact it's already in the game all over the place. USF simply lacks a heavy, other factions don't. It's not implicitly unbalanced to add one. It depends on implementation. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Jackson needs a slight buff11 Jan 2015, 06:02 AM Higher pen / lower damage would be greatly preferred to be honest, so the Jackson didn't shut down T3 and it was more effective against heavies, which is what you actually usually build them for. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Reinforced Wire. Why....?10 Jan 2015, 07:44 AM One of many headscratchers with OKW. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Callin meta: Discussions and Solutions10 Jan 2015, 04:28 AM I am in favor of a hybrid solution. Increase fuel cost for call-ins, get cost reduction for tiering. For example, a Tiger may cost 280 fuel instead of 230. By tiering up to T3 you get a 30 fuel reduction (250). Going to T4 reduces the cost to 230 (the original base value). Exact implementation is open to discussion but this idea is to make call-in only strategies possible, but less cost efficient compared to teching. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: 120mm Mortar M1943 - no counter, no weakness10 Jan 2015, 00:38 AM I have no idea why the 120 can retreat with 1 man, that's my only major complaint against it. It is out of line with every other weapon team in the game (bar MGs which all can retreat with 1 man). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Dropped weapons9 Jan 2015, 03:39 AM Guards with LMG are the ol' Loot Goblins. Good times. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: soviet t3 and t4 cost issues....9 Jan 2015, 03:27 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Jan 2015, 02:16 AMMr. Someguy Well if it's 1941 they can do Romania, Romania actually had vehicles that were relevent in 1941. Even though those tanks were French and Czech made and thus would probably also appear in French and German factions. Well that just means it's a cheap faction to add, relic would love the idea! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: soviet t3 and t4 cost issues....9 Jan 2015, 02:01 AM I think the main problem would be they like to start at two factions then expand to four. So you'd either have like, Ita vs Commonwealth, which wouldn't have Germans and is therefore illegal according to Relic, or Germany vs France, which may be underwhelming because a lot of people don't like France or think they have a really bad military reputation / no interesting units. But boy it would be a breath of fresh air. North Africa campaign, Fall Gelb campaign. Could even do a '41 era Soviets thing but I can't think of a third faction to add unless it's... ostheer... again. God I'm sick of two Germ factions every game ( In: COH2 Balance
Thread: soviet t3 and t4 cost issues....9 Jan 2015, 00:57 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Jan 2015, 23:14 PMKatitof Assuming no new factions will be added. I'd like to see something more and for coh2 to really become best WW2 platform around, but if it happens it'll be another year of same problems. They will need to keep adding expansions and/or payed content. Another 3 years on CoH2 isn't feasible without a steady trickle of income to pay for the support. I'd prefer they basically abandon CoH2 at this point, maybe a few commanders and ToW missions and announce CoH3. 1940/41 setting Commonwealth, France vs Germany, Italy No Tigers, no MP44s In: COH2 Balance