Profile of RMMLz

Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2015, 13:36 PMDon'tKnow

Last Relic stream i asked them and they said that they are planning to take a look at the whole doctrine,not only the KV-2.

The questions still is when and if they are doing so.

Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2015, 13:16 PMSirRaven of Coventry

Don't bring Relic on ideas here, they will put defensive sandbag structures in a new Ostheer doctrine, only $7,99.

Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2015, 09:05 AMAustralian Magic

Give it to all, or remove from USF and WFA.
Simple.
FRP is huge advtange on big maps.

Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2015, 09:07 AMShell_yeah

halftracks are stronger than fhqs imo, you can reinforce your blob on the move anywhere on the map.

Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2015, 06:46 AMJohnnyB

Let's just see what the new patch brings, then we go from there.

Jump back to quoted post17 Sep 2015, 05:43 AMwongtp

2x ISG, mortars HT with incendiary rounds. gotta use the right counter to emplacement. bofors hit hard but only hit hard if you put dudes infront of them. brits lack in early indirect fire and mortar pits arent worth it because they fall fast to incendiary rounds or ISG can barrage them indefinitely, they're basically sitting ducks.

On paper, yes you can counter them and I've said that it might be L2P issue but the ammount of Muni and time you have to invest to counter an emplacement "specially in some maps like Trois" is too damn high. And again, if you counter them early the Brit player could leave the game as well since it's over. There are good suggestions on how to tweak (not nerf or buff, tweak) emplacements. I'm tired of going MHT almost every game (while we are at it, the accuracy on that incendiary...)

emplacements are still sitting ducks, easily countered not sure why people are having problems with them at all. the schwere panzer HQ is much tougher to counter and dislodge than emplacements to be honest.

Schwere is off-topic, no comment there. But in 2s, Brits can stall and the other faction (SOVs of course) can keep you busy. The snowballing effect is very high for Brits.

churchill and comets are great tanks but not a balance issue, panthers/AT guns can still take them on, on top of that, they cost a whole lot of resources. churchill crocs are the real problem, that flamer needs a bit of toning down.

Comets are fine, for Churchills we have to wait but I think 1400 is still a bit too much. Its HUGE HP pool allows them to soak too much damage, push and call arty, scout etc. then fall back. A supported Churchill is a beast. Even if you flank it, it's gonna take ages to finish it off granted it's unsupported. And the longer the game takes, the more powerful Brits become-Snowballing

if you play them alot, brits are extremely reliant on clutch units, wasp flamer and centaur for most of their anti infantry work, these 2 are performing a little too well currently, but wasp will get patched, centaur needs a small damage and penetration nerf and its gold.

I'm with you there. They rely on cheese and their cheese is very powerful. I don't have a problem with Wasp (222, 'nough said). If anything, I would like to see itss damage nerfed and its armor buffed (or give it utility to escape) 222 shreds that thing. For Centaur, it suffers from the Bofors problem, Shreds infantry in no time. Correct me if I'm wrong but it has the same price as an Ostwin (or maybe cheaper-tech costs not included) but it is clearly an "effective" unit. StugS handle them though)

once these are patched, things will change