Profile of RMMLz

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1

General Information
Register Time: 27 Dec 2013, 16:54 PM
Last Visit Time: 28 Mar 2024, 23:06 PM
Website: https://shaderweb.com/en
Residence:

Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Nationality:

Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Timezone: Asia/Tehran
Game Name: <HOJAT>RMMLz

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Should OKW be able to build caches?10 Apr 2015, 18:59 PM First of all, I appreciate your effort gathering information from community. To answer the OP, absolutely not (unless you remove resource transfer), because of a couple of main reasons: 1. It will add a whole new dimension of balance problems in large games. Even 2v2 double OKW will be unstoppable 2. OKW has a buttload of unspent MP 3. Just imagine buildin 2 caches of muni (400MP which is an Ober squad), then transferring all of that muni to fuel, or vice versa. Here is what will happen in a typical 2v2 double OKW game: each player build 1-2 Muni caches ---> Schreckblob for each ---> Covert to fuel ---> Hello 12 minute mark KT. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: okw munis cost10 Apr 2015, 18:52 PM Pupchen is fine now, the only problem-like any other unit-is that since the gun does not provide cover, you have to place them in green cover which makes them very vulnerable to insta-wipes. If you get it to vet3 (which is not that hard) it will counter almost everything. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: The problem with SHOCKS is....10 Apr 2015, 18:46 PM They only perform "well" (not OP) in urban maps, when you can flank your enemy without being detected. They can not Move towards you in an open field without losing models. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Panzergrenadiers underperforming (with video proof)10 Apr 2015, 12:03 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Apr 2015, 11:55 AMFaustCostBulletin You are both partially correct. Here flamethrowers simply ignore cover, but against builidngs they have a 1.6x damage multiplier Thanks for the clarification. In: Lobby
Thread: Panzergrenadiers underperforming (with video proof)10 Apr 2015, 11:51 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Apr 2015, 11:01 AMBunkerJunker He is right about flamethrower damage against housed units or units in cover though. Are you sure? This was the case in vCOH (which flamers inflicted more damage to units in cover), but I think in COH2 flame weapons simply ignore cover. In: Lobby
Thread: Bullits: Flanking Maneuvers and other things10 Apr 2015, 11:42 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Apr 2015, 09:52 AMCardboard Tank Correct me if I´m wrong, but I think those achievements are outdated. You can´t unlock anything by fulfilling the task. You need to get a lucky drop by playing multiplayer games. The chance to get a drop for Soviets is higher when playing Soviets. As for members: It´s the entities on the mortar. A German mortar has 4 members, a Russian mortar has 6 members. Though I´m not 100% sure whether you don´t get one member per weapon crew less - as the last member runs away instead of being killed on the regular mortars (not the Russian 120mm). You're right, it's possible to get the achievement but the bulletin itself is in the hands of RNG GODS. Regarding the other issue, the forth member with escapes can be killed, so I think you have to kill it. In: Lobby
Thread: [Feedback requested] - balancing issues in large team games10 Apr 2015, 03:57 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Apr 2015, 03:48 AMAlexzandvar If you limit the amount of caches each player could make then you could avoid the instances of having 1 player just spamming them while everyone else picks up the slack. Like I said before, just cap out the incomes so you can't go past certain amounts to accelerate the game anymore to make the playing field more fair and encourage comebacks. Caches are good for allowing players to negate the loss of not having a fuel point, but stack to much when you have 1 fuel point. 1 muni + 1 fuel cache per player would mean you could only have a max of 4 fuel caches if you had all Ost players which you will almost never find in 4's. What if instead of limiting the resource cap as you say and thus limiting gameplay, making cashes both more expensive, and nerf their income. This way, player should decide if they want to sacrifice significant amount of MP for a little bit fuel income, or they want to call in more units. Something like 250 for a cache which generates 30% less resources than normal. -- IpKaiFung pointed out a very important issue, maps are very big and you can't afford to fall back. That's why I usually play OKW or USF, for the sake of forward retreat point. Is it possible to assign some a certain capture point as a retreat point for the team which is holding it? Something like Medic or Repair points in ToW. Not very close to frontline, but also not deep inside the base. Might be problematic to balance though. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Mortar Thread10 Apr 2015, 03:24 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Apr 2015, 03:10 AMJHeartless You guys need to stop living in the vanilla COH2 days. Prec strike cannot whipe full health support weapons since the last nerf to it. It used to use the 120mm AOE which is why you'll never see them in 1v1 anymore. You will see the 120 however. Since the infantry rebalance, support weapon incoming accuracy they can be whiped out just as fast as Soviets can whipe 4 man squads. The extra entities only come in handy vs HE. With having over 300% slower reload it is worse then Osts in every way. Having 30% more models doesn't make up for that piss poor reload. I have to disagree based on my experience. PAKs and Mortars need at least 2 men, so if you put your PAK and mortar in cover, thanks to the curret cover system, they clump up and one PS is enough to wipe the the crew. Even MG crew stay close enough to each other which can get wiped by PS. I mostly use PS to counter enemy's mortar, because most of the time you can one shot them. PS is very powerful (not OP though). Regarding the other issue, I agree. I would rather have a 4 man squad with better reload than an army of a crew with terrible reload like this. Although, as the tooltip says, the barrage becomes faster and faster as it continues (120mm). In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: okw munis cost10 Apr 2015, 00:37 AM Actually I don't see any major issue with OKW's mid game. Raketen is good, and it's also cheap so you get two of them. One in a building and another for support. Or you can get one raketen and 1 or 2 Schrecks to support it. Raketen also scales very well if you keep it alive, I'm very happy with it's buff. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: [Feedback requested] - balancing issues in large team games10 Apr 2015, 00:35 AM Well, it seems that the community thinks the most important factor is the map design. When you think of it, their right, maps give a lot of resources. But I don't think we will see any changes in that regard (map overhauls, increase/decrease CPs etc). Maybe just reduce CP income significantly (like 50-60%), and make caches a little expensive (like 250). In: COH2 Balance