Profile of atouba

Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2015, 15:02 PMAce of Swords

Damage wise is fine, buff the speed sightly also whats it's hp compared to the ostwind?

Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2015, 07:15 AMvietnamabc

Centaur should have a reuduction in cost, I think 80 fuel is right with their current level of performance.

Jump back to quoted post31 Oct 2015, 13:07 PMcolgate

End of ost tech tree u getting better tank than any allied fuction, also ost tech tree unlocks some upgrdes (pfaust-rifle nade-lmg42-panzerhsrecks).
Brits nade unlock 25 fuel
Brits lmg/piat unlock 25 fuel
soviet molotv unlock 25 fuel
soviet at nade 25 fuel
usf zook/bar unlock 25 fuel
usf nade unlock 25 fuel

soviet/usf t4= ost t3

Jump back to quoted post30 Oct 2015, 19:37 PMFiresparks

I believe that's the intention. Their small target size contribute to their survivability. This is just complaining that the british tank can actually last more than 10 second in combat, unlike the t34 76 and even 75mm sherman. The jackson have size 24 and the jpz4 have size 17, and it's one of the biggest factor in the difference between their survivability.

Raise the price of the cromwell or nerf the gun if necessary, but the cromwell's small size allow it to actually fight the german and not die horribly.

stuff like the halftrack and 222 should be a bit smaller.