Profile of CookiezNcreem

Avatar Area

Offline United States
Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15

General Information
Register Time: 19 Dec 2013, 18:31 PM
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/CookieZR6
Website: http://steamcommunity.com/groups/USFOPCOH2/members
Steam: 76561198094724817
Residence:

United States
Nationality:

United States
Timezone: America/Indiana/Knox
Game Name: CookiezNcreem

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Ask the Strategist!6 Sep 2015, 16:49 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2015, 16:08 PMUrmel How should i use the airlanding officer? Like you use commandos They have the same guns,same models,and an OP "rally" ability(that works with the squad itself,so you dont need other squads to take advantage of it. It doesnt break suppression,keep that in mind) on top of it, except they cant camo and they have 4 men instead of 5. The recon ability at vet 1 is cheap,and should be used before you attack or to find a clear path to perform a tactical insertion with your commandos you buy from the glider. In: Strategy Desk
Thread: Operation Charlie Fox sign-ups thread6 Sep 2015, 16:07 PM alias CookiezNcreem id 76561198094724817 In: Operation Charlie Fox
Thread: Why brits are so lame in 1v16 Sep 2015, 06:07 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Sep 2015, 01:55 AMGiaA 1. Removing the vickers upgrade would mean one less upgrade option which takes aways decision making which is always a bad thing in coh2 imo 2. The bren is actually a really good unit vs OKW even without the upgrade. It allows you to dominate the early game due to the lack of fausts. Giving it the vickers from the start would make it completely overpowered vs OKW Or just target tables then In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why brits are so lame in 1v15 Sep 2015, 22:45 PM Maybe the Bren carried having the mg Upgrade stock(making it into a well armored kubel that could chase) as well as having a Target table for snipers would solve aloooot of problems? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Designate command tank ability5 Sep 2015, 13:50 PM My friends in 4v4 have giant swarms of comet and firefly influenced by Churchill command tank raping face so beautiful In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: the centaur 5 Sep 2015, 05:05 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2015, 04:51 AMMaschinengewehr Would you recommend a Cromwell over a Centaur most of the time? I play Brits like I played ostheer. Stall. For. Those. OP LATE TANKS. like comet and Churchill You can rely on double 6pdr and AEC to stop basically every vehicle while you stall like you can rely on double pak40 and puma. This is 2v2+ observation so far btw. Haven't played a lot of 1v1 YET but again I'd imagine the principles are the same; you don't go Ostwind when you're behind as ostheer unless you're really confident in your AT gun micro; so why do it with the centaur as Brits. And from what I've seen in live games/replays of 1v1 Brits, you'll be lucky to hit T3 before enemy has 1 P4 and another t3 unit on the way with how far behind Brits are early game and fuel wise. They might as well have a fuel penalty. So I that case, stall for the anvil hammer armor. 1 Cromwell/firefly/centaur will die to T3 SO fast when you have no map. Churchill and comet hard counter ostheer T3 so hard if you play them right, so why even bother with T3 brit units at all. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: the centaur 5 Sep 2015, 04:38 AM Buying a centaur instead of a tank that can engage other tanks as Brits is pretty significant risk, or an icing on the cake of a game that you're winning like buying an ostwind as OSTHEER while being behind fuel wise most of the game. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: balance preview mod rifle buff5 Sep 2015, 00:26 AM I'll save you the time and effort, and the others reading this drivel their sanity. in the future;Don't bother typing another one of those long ass posts to me. You are literally a thread killer. It is so pointless to argue and discuss with you. You're never wrong,you never agree or settle with anything, and you continually spam your opinion in these page-killing paragraphs until the other person gives up. completely pointless. You accomplished absolutely nothing but making this thread a bitch to scroll through. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: balance preview mod rifle buff4 Sep 2015, 22:14 PM RIP thread. Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2015, 21:46 PMAlexzandvar Sections cost more to reinforce then Riflemen do (and have to be upgraded to 5 men) and they don't even have received accuracy bonus's from Vet until they hit Vet 3. They are also much more dependent on cover for their DPS. Riflemen also have a snare + a grenade package. This buff will give USF's starting infantry better received accuracy at Vet 3 than Pgrens, which cost more and are Ostheers only elite infantry option. Im glad usf has other non doc elite infantry. RIFLEMEN ARE THE ELITE INFANTRY. THEY ARE ALSO THE STARITNG INFANTRY. Actually a large amount of them do. Obers need their LMG to be useful (75 muni), Stormtroopers need StG's (100 muni), Volks need Shreks (112 muni), and the best thing about JLI is their munitions based abilities such as Booby Trap and Sprint. Unbelievable Riflemen simply need a reduction in reinforce cost or an extra man at Vet 3, this received accuracy buff is simply not needed in the context of the rest of the changes nor is it constant with received accuracy Veterancy for other factions. So you'd rather fight 6 men rifle. Lmao I wouldn't call "This is how the game works" cancerous spew, why are you so immature? And without both slot weapons that easily beat upgraded grens and Volks and can kill Sturms attempting to close. Yes upgrading them to stay useful later into the game is necessary but that's the case for literally every faction in the game. Immature,lol,its fatigue from having these arguements with you every week. you suggesting that grenadiers dont have an LMG late game(they have them 5 minutes into the game,its not a matter of upgrading late game,you upgrade at 5 minutes or lose every inf fight to lmg grens. You acting as if sturms are the only infantry OKW has,is the reason im "immature" at this point. You need two 60 muni weapons and vet 3 to compete without bleedig like a pig,and once you get the weapon and the vet,your squad STILL isnt among the best squads in the game?How much sense does that make? Ostheer doesn't even have an true elite infantry option. If your gripe is lack of elite infantry why not ask for elite fighting infantry instead of overbuffing basic infantry? USF also now has access to a very good MG, which gives +1 to fighting units. Ostheer has alot of other things going for them.(They only lack "elite inf"(LMG Grens dont exist?) and they dont have GREAT artillery.(even though panzerwerfer is getting a huge buff soon) Please dont act like ostheer is suddenly in the shit because they dont have SS Panzergrenadiers and Dora artillery.. Seriously. Again,riflemen,are the elite infantry,they are the AT infantry,they are the heavy infantry,THEY ARE THE INFANTRY,AND THEY NEED TO BE AS GOOD AS THEY ARE NOW. Your logic also doesn't make a terrible amount of sense considering picking a commander with that infantry option locks you out from picking the others. More arguing just to argue. OKW has more infantry types,and more infantry. because they have a fuck ton of manpower vs usf. Clearly their infantry isnt lacking. That is what I meant. Twist it how you may. Obers, Fallsch, Pgrens, Storms, JLI, and Sturms all cost more than Riflemen do, and Ass grens cost the same amount. 280+120 only rivals 400/60 of obers,which btw,obers are better than rifles assuming max vet on both. and 280+120= more by a long shot than all the other units you mentioned. BECAUSE THEY NEED 2 UPGRADES TO BE WORTH MORE. Fallsch tend not to be "mixed" as they are elite infantry made for operating alone picking off lone squads. Also they tend to just not be used in general because they are overpriced and lose to much DPS per model lost while not being hard to it. So you just leave your falls to die after spawning them? Or do you mix them into your force and let them vet? I mean really? It's not forgiving MP wise, you just have no option to spend it on anything but more infantry because you are very limited on vehicle options. In general floating MP has been going out of style for OKW for a while now because defensive floatly play isn't all that viable with the recent artillery proliferation. Congrats? None of this arty proliferation exists with usf,unless you count the unreleased calliope. Comparing things on an equal playing field is bad because.....? But to humor you most of the time you won't see Vet 4-5 on most units outside of Volks. What? Yes we are comparing max vet obers with max vet rifles with 2 upgrades. And the obers win. assuming max vet and upgrade!!! You know,we're talking about SCALING and all. This assumes of course that the Ober squad gets to vet 4. But really this is more about comparing squads on an equal playing field. Because fighting this huge amount of useful vetted riflemen in a long game all the sudden wont allow obers to vet. Fallsch are incredibly hard to vet up due to having high causality rates and expensive reinforcement costs. Yes at 4 and 5 they do very well, but getting them there is hard. But this thread is about comparing infantry units on a level playing field and understanding the context of the changes and what is considered good or not. Missed the point I find this very humorous, why do you oppose com paring units on a similar playing field? Please cease with the personal attacks. Please stop ruining threads Top 5: -Royal Anvil Engineers (Gotta love having 2 armor, base .8 received accuracy at vet 0 and 0.528 at vet 3 ) They also move slow as molasses. And cant dodge anything explosive without retreating. -Vet 4 ObersAn okw unit -Vet 2 Shock Troops Must charge into dick touching range,so they need this vitality -Vet 3 IS A unit that will probably be nerfed because of axis fill in the blanks like you -Vet 3 Riflemen See above So 1 OKW unit, wouldn't really call that "reserved" Ok mr stat,tell me how many OKW units are within .20 of those units you just listed? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: balance preview mod rifle buff4 Sep 2015, 21:05 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Sep 2015, 20:49 PMAlexzandvar If your looking for a specific reason thus is problematic, Riflemen at a Vet 3 5 men squad will have 0.560175 received accuracy. Vet 3 Sturms (4 men) have .66, Vet 3 Volks (5 men) have .81, Vet 3 Obers (4 men) have .497, Vet 3 JLI (4 men) have 0.568, Vet 3 Fallsch (4 men) have 0.55593, Vet 3 Pgrens (4 men) have 0.568, Vet 3 Storms (4 men) have 0.5325, Vet 3 Ass Grens (5 men) have .71. So yeah Riflemen at Vet 3 will be in the top 5 most durable squads in the game thanks to not being limited to a 4 man squad while having received accuracy normally reserved for extremely expensive elite infantry. NONE of those squads require 120 munitions in upgrades to perform vs riflemen,so yes actually at "max power" if you will,riflemen are the most expensive infantry in the game,while being the main infantry of the faction,which means they die the most as well. No matter what BS you cancerously spew,they need to use both slots with weapons to have similar performance to axis counterparts,even with this buff. None of the squads you mentioned are the only combat infantry unit of their faction nondoctrinally, the only ones of those that are "extremely expensive" are obers and falls,which doesnt take into account that OKW almost always has more infantry than USF(Which means falls and volks mixed together vs 3-4 riflemen) thanks to being way more forgiving manpower wise. And why arent you including vet 4-5 combat bonuses like obers supressing like rifles cannot do anymore,and falls being fucking cloaking terminators at vet 4-5? Or are yo ujust gonna sit there,ruin this thread with another shit argument, and act like its not possible to get vet 4 and 5? And gee,alex,I'd hope allies have at least one unit thats in the top 5 most durable squads,or is that just reserved for OkW? get a clue,and while you do that,gtfo this thread. In: COH2 Balance