Profile of CookiezNcreem

Avatar Area

Offline United States
Posts: 3052 | Subs: 15

General Information
Register Time: 19 Dec 2013, 18:31 PM
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/CookieZR6
Website: http://steamcommunity.com/groups/USFOPCOH2/members
Steam: 76561198094724817
Residence:

United States
Nationality:

United States
Timezone: America/Indiana/Knox
Game Name: CookiezNcreem

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Mortar Carriage 22 May 2015, 20:41 PM LMAO In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Ask the Strategist!22 May 2015, 19:11 PM Jump back to quoted post22 May 2015, 17:31 PMalcoholic i got a couple of question concerning recrewing team weapons: which statistics of the soldiers get carried over to the new formed team? say i recrew a mg42 with panzergrenadiers - do the new mg 42 crew fire mp44s? does the crew keep the 80% incomming accuracy statistic of the PGs? say i recrew with Pioneers - does the mg keep the increased vision range? in general: i remember some general malus for weapon crews - 125% received damage or something like that. does a newly recrewed weapon keep this? thanks in advance for the answers Yes it does keep the basic team weapon received accuracy(which balances the fact that a maxim re crewed with shocks would have armor) ,as compesation you get the squads BASE weapons. A panzergrenadier crewed MG42 will be extremely powerful and hard to flank because it will have MP44s. But it will also have panzergrenasier reinforce cost. A pioneer crewed MG will keep pio view range and their SMGs. A vet 3 pathfinder crewed 50 cal will have normal rifles,not the "critical" sniper, because that's not their "base" weapon, and they will also have the pathfinder's VET 0 sight boost instead of vet 3 boost because crewing a weapon does not transfer veterancy bonuses or veterancy. In: Strategy Desk
Thread: Review of 2v2 _teamwork_ - any advice is appreciated!22 May 2015, 15:26 PM Jump back to quoted post22 May 2015, 14:47 PMkamk Uhm, that's a 1v1 replay. Somethings wrong with the replay parser or something like that,and some 2v2s are shown as 1v1s etc etc. And thats not a 1v1 map anyway, In: Replay Reviews
Thread: Ask the Strategist!22 May 2015, 12:13 PM Schwerer HQ: 1,600 Battlegroup and Mechanized: 1920 Considering the artillery shells scatter randomly in the circle theres no set amount of hitpoints lost per barrage,but you can realistically expect to deal 800-1100 damage for Time on target,155 mm,and IR Pathfinders depending on if your shells scatter or not. All artillery shells except armor company 240mm do 120 damage a hit. Armor does 320 if it does manage to hit. Armor company and major barrage is not reliable or worth the munitions for attacking OKW buildings because of their accuracy In: Strategy Desk
Thread: Yeap Relic .50 cal HMG get destroyed by 2 rifle nades22 May 2015, 02:01 AM Jump back to quoted post22 May 2015, 01:19 AMVuther Lol In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: no chat button21 May 2015, 23:50 PM I could see agreeing with this is if you can turn off the ALL chat only...someone BMing or even chatting to you from the other team besides GLHF and GGWP is completely unneeded and pointless anyway. But... Jump back to quoted post21 May 2015, 21:46 PMdasheepeh welcome to the internet Pretty much. Unless they're spamming down the side of your screen into the gameplay itself or something...I think there's a spam filter anyway. If you're getting emotionally disturbed by the chat because it correlates to your real life issues I wouldn't recommend being on the internet period. That's a whole nother issue.. having the option to remove chat completely says fuck it to any sort of PROPER communication in random team games. Which DOES happen a decent amount of the time when I dare attempt to play them. What if your teammate is trying to tell you what doctrine he's picking or what strat he's trying to do and you're ignoring? In other less team based games like COD that makes sense. Here it simply doesn't. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Suggestion / realistic fix to German rifle nades.21 May 2015, 03:07 AM Jump back to quoted post21 May 2015, 01:35 AMTobis I just came here to say that the Blendkörper 2H Frangible Smoke Grenade is the best grenade in the game. Thank you. +1 Agreed. It counters blobs,garrisons,superior equipped squads....such a great grenade. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Mortar Carriage 20 May 2015, 15:27 PM Jump back to quoted post20 May 2015, 14:44 PMCorsin Same reason people make threads about the StugE and 120mm.... Cover bunching isnt gonna get fixed any time soon, units that overperform with it should be brought into line until thats fixed. And Paks wernt working... Its pretty easy to come out with the obvious strat/counter, people even tried it with the Vanilla tiger ace... but in practice there are lots of other factors... So nerf all explosives into the ground so that when the cover bunch fix comes we have useless explosives? (which literally takes one click of a button in mod tools btw) Are you seriously comparing countering the scott to the old tiger ace.... \ / im done here In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Mortar Carriage 20 May 2015, 14:11 PM Jump back to quoted post20 May 2015, 13:57 PMCorsin Id love to but was playing OStheer Panther is at the end of a long tech tree. But i agree that would be fine. And ive played far more than 1 game where ive had Scotts 1 shot squads way too oftem... Like someone else said it is a covertuning issue, But that makes some units like this and the Stug E overperform... Only reason this thread doesnt involve the stug E is because its doctrinal, has less range and fights 5-6 man squads not 4, so wipes are less common. pak will make him micro even harder, and mobile defense Puma and bosstruppen with command tank for rifle blobz>>>> Scott and bar spam everytime Why blame the already nerfed to hell motor carriage instead of making a thread on cover bunching? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: How do you use PG's?20 May 2015, 13:59 PM Jump back to quoted post20 May 2015, 11:02 AMachpawel All true. But most of the mentioned things can be done by GIs with the same results. I love suggestions such as keep them in cover. Opposite armies can keep units in cover as well. To me a unit which has to be kept in cover to be useful shouldnt be so expensive and definitely shouldnt require tech. All in all they are useful only when U are a better player than Ur opponent. Skilled players wont let U use them in such preplanned conditions. They will force them to retreat and finish the squad on the run. If U keep them in cover U will be wasting lots of manpower doing nothing for too long. Just remember that as wehr U have to tech and U have fewer units on the field. One more unit waiting in cover waiting means Ur opponent can atyack somewhere else. Basically ost ost is terribly underperforming and players only hope to find magic solutions to serious balance problems. I don't think people mean camp them in green cover, I think it means take and use cover skillfully. pgrens perform just fine. They aren't shocks. They have LMG gren DPS at long range and twice the damage of them at mid range. Which beats all infantry except double bar rifles and Guards/shocks. Assuming the pgrens are unsupported which should never happen. If supported they beat everything thrown at them. In: Ostheer Strategies