Profile of JHeartless

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 1637

General Information
Steam: 76561198006521729


Thread: Relic is heading in the direction we asked them to go!22 Jan 2015, 20:36 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jan 2015, 14:04 PMRMMLz That's the challenge I was talking about. Turning a game into a real F2P and not P2W is hard. I've said that you can't compare this RTS with other game titles, but look at LoL, TF2, WoT, WT etc. They some how managed to make true F2P games. The fact that we have paid for this game is true, but so did TF2 players. I my self think that if making the game F2P means more content and support for many years, constant updates, bigger player base, ESL partnership and big tournaments with huge prize pool, that would be great. Although I have paid for this game, I've had enjoyable 600 hrs so far for around 60 bucks and I would rather play it for many more years instead of it going into my good ol' days archive. Either way, your points are valid, and it's not like they are gonna make it F2P because of some post on this site. I was just pointing out one possible (although debatable) decision that they could make. +1 I could care less that I paid over 100.00 US for this game. Let it go F2P so that the ladder gets filled out. Its very hard to get better for me when I either play rank 10000k players then the next game a top 10 player. I am too skilled for one and under prepared for the other. There is 0 wrong with a larger player base. Allowing Relic to hire more staff is also a plus as we could get balance patchs and content faster. There are more for a F2P model at this point then against it. I get that people paid for this game but we have ALL gotten our monies worth at this point... In: Lobby
Thread: Relic is heading in the direction we asked them to go!22 Jan 2015, 02:49 AM Yes since most of our players play comp stomp we will be spending a million dollars improving AI this year!!! We will release a special Mountain Dew edition for a game code that will grant your Tiger the Bling Bling skin and your Grens can be outfitted in clown suits! This is more likely then massive improvements to multiplayer. Of course they could go another route. And realize 4v4 is the most popular game mode and decide to balance around it. Add a bunch of new 3v3 and 4v4 maps....also a GREAT idea.... In: Lobby
Thread: The Company of Heroes 2 Veterancy Guide21 Jan 2015, 23:02 PM Excellent Guide Great work. Gotta love Rifles Backwards Vet.....and Vet 3 Penals. I never realized....but they are like Unicorns... In: Guides
Thread: soviet vs okw matchup 21 Jan 2015, 18:42 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Jan 2015, 18:23 PMWingZero Its so retarded that I would need to call in pair of T-34/85s (than spam) + marked vehicle or IS-2 to take down one KT/Panther. This is exactly why nobody favors building T3 building what so ever (or JUST for the T-70). The medium armor play before WFA was flavorful, now is just awful thanks to OberShrek blobs. Agreed 100%. All Tier build units need a boost and all call ins need a nerf so that they are equally viable. Total cost to acquire should be in that equation. KT being strong I get it. It costs a freaking fortune to call that beast in. But Tigers killing 3-4 T34/76s? Ehhhhhh not so much. Or T34/85s shutting down Ostheer T3 completely? With no way for Ostheer to afford a Panther counter...not so good. P4s could stand a decent enough chance against T34/85s if it wasnt for Mark Vehicle. Its like Giving Jacksons 800 HPs per at that point and being cheaper.... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger Ace21 Jan 2015, 18:27 PM I dont even think the Ace itself is OP. Its a more powerful Tiger not a game ending monster. HOW ITS ACQUIRED is OP. I think most folks that play 1v1 would agree. And also why team game players so no issue with it. Can the Ace be killed? Sure! Its a little harder than a Tiger to kill but I prefer it personally over a Panther as USF. But allowing P4s galore and then forcing an engagement then TA to mop up is broken as hell. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: soviet vs okw matchup 21 Jan 2015, 18:14 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Jan 2015, 18:09 PMKronosaur0s T34/85 weak. Lol. 1600 HPs per Pair. Hardly weak. Just not AI monsters. Like everyone fascination with Easy 8s. Sure they are good AT and have decent AI but they are hardly Shrek deterrents. Personally I prefer the regular Sherman at least it does something REALLY WELL instead of a few roles just all right... T34/85s are by far my favorite tank in the game if you went Guards motor. They are surprisingly mediocre without Mark Vehicle though. If more people played them without that ability people would be less impressed. But even without it they are great for cost. Closest you can get to a P4 AT wise out of an Allied Medium... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つGIVE USF HEAVY ARMOR༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ21 Jan 2015, 03:10 AM The Iraqis in 91 were not advantaged with main battle tanks. They had them. But it was not an advantage as they sucked. You can read it either way. It does not simply say the USF had no heavy tanks. You interpreted that to mean something. I interpret it another way. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: soviet vs okw matchup 20 Jan 2015, 23:31 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Jan 2015, 18:23 PMCulainn For the record, I know what he meant but decided to ignore its impolite character as unworthy behavior of the individual who posted it. It would seem however that few understood what I wrote in my original post. Rather than a plea for realism let me say again that the range on the Panzershreck is the primary cause of OKW imbalance issues, Volkshreck blobbing, and the lack of alternative AT use. I propose it be reduced by 5. Even the Vaunted "Weapon Profiles" would help. I mean who would be more accurate with a Shrek? An Elite PanzerGren or a mishmash of Walking Wounded from Different squads and experience levels? My money is on the PanzerGrens. Even their name implies they work with armor. Volks implies they are regular Joes. Reduce accuracy for Shreks on Volks substantially. Since Pgrens cost about 50% more lets lower its long range accuracy by the same margin and call it a day. At Vet it will come out to be about the same as a Pgren. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つGIVE USF HEAVY ARMOR༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ20 Jan 2015, 23:22 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Jan 2015, 03:47 AMMr. Someguy So does the US, however the bottom line is the United States Army did not use any Heavy Tanks during the Battle of the Bulge. The closest thing they had were Sherman Jumbo's with 76mm Guns, and even then most Jumbers were armed with 75mm Guns as that was still the factory standard for a Sherman Tank. It is part of the official check here. It is a very good reason why it couldn't appear in the US Faction, it was not used by the US Army. "Shermans are boring" isn't a good argument to bring in the Sherman Firefly either The US Forces were not ‘advantaged’ with heavy tanks. There is absolutely no equivalent to Tigers, King Tigers, Jagdtigers. This is an intended asymmetrical element that matches history. That doesnt mean no Heavy Tanks. It means if they had one it would suck. That is all. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Community Farewell from pqumsieh20 Jan 2015, 03:39 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Jan 2015, 03:38 AMelchino7 Gl, may we see you carrying Shocks on M3s in the future. Wonder who is gonna take the lead now Probably Cynthia...... In: Lobby