Profile of Aerohank

I have a nice and juicy "3% increased penetration for JT". U need it? No? Why not if I may ask...

Well, it increase the chance to penetrate another JT from the front from 95% to 98% at far range.

OKW's lack of early anti-garrison necessitates the sWs's building crush. Without it, Semois is probably unplayable and would definitely auto-lose against Soviet FHQ. The only thing that really needs fixing is the insta-crit on buildings like Faymonville.

Bad example, you can't get a FHQ up as soviets on semois because OKW will have base pinned you before you can even take your cut-off. If you get an M3 first, the FHQ will be late enough that OKW has anti-garrison on the field.

And? its nearly completely unavailable for the most time. of the hundred or so okw games i have played i have seen far more 85's then KT's. yet you suggest you put an unit in tier that the ostheer tier 3 cannot handle in any way and even give severe issues with the okw's tier 2 and 3. Suffice to say putting the 85 in tier 3 is a vedry stupid idea and anybody applauding it has no frigging clue how to do proper balance.

Ostheer would have no problems with T34/85s in soviet T3. It's like saying that Soviet T3 can't handle Ostheer T3 in any way. It's bullshit. Get a PAK40 or a panzerschrek squad, plant some mines.

The only problem Ostheer has against T34/85s is that they outnumber P4s because they are call-in tanks and thus require no tech investment to call-in. Having a 120 fuel unlock barrier will fix this.

As for OKW, they have no right to complain. T34/76s are a joke against OKW because all they need to counter it are volksgrenadiers with panzerschreks. T34/85s are the only soviet medium tanks that actually force the OKW to get some armor.

It's very silly that soviets are stuck using early-war units while the multiplayer is set in the later stages of the war. Having T34/76s as stock units would be fine if axis had P3 and STUGIIIs as their best stock tanks, but they can field panthers and even bloody Tiger IIs. If we want the stupid call-in meta to change, the soviet stock army needs to be of the same caliber as the axis stock army. And that means an actual late-war medium tank.

Try harder, you noobcake!

Good work with these statistics.
I see there are many people who thinks that Axis "popularity" is due to the fact that they are more "easy" to play. Let me ask you something: If a game has several factions, what would be the faction you would play the most? The most OP (strong overall, standard units and easy to play) or the one who is more challanging (high risk-high profit, cool units, etc)
That's the question you need to ask yourselves.

I would, that is why I play mostly allies.

When I play OKW I just spam volks, throw 10 ammo mini nuke grenades everywhere, spam panzerschreks for AT, get a single Ubersoldaten squad that easily racks up 60+ kills every game and get some panthers or a KT to finish of my opponent.

Teching costs are absolutely nothing with OKW and their volks are incredibly cheap to reinforce in the lategame considering their effectiveness as both AT platforms and mini-nuke lobbing AI platforms. That is, if it ever gets to that and the game does not end with kubel/pio/truck cut-off push shenanigans.

If you want a challenge, play Soviets while using doctrines without call-in tanks. See how your first T34/76 gets insta-countered by 3 panzerschreks and how your basic infantry gets shredded by übersoldaten.