Profile of coh2player

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1571

General Information


Thread: ISU-1529 May 2014, 18:01 PM Outside of call-in strikes, Elefant can be countered with a pair (or three if possible) of Zis guns and engine damage with AT nades just like it was a year ago. You just have to flank and maneuver an infantry + AT gun blob at it. Sure, it's not risk free but that's how it's done. There's also the more expensive method of using penal squads + conscripts + zis. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU85 derserves some AI ability9 May 2014, 15:07 PM ^ Buffing the SU's AI would make it a Super Stug (range 60) that also has high (190) penetration. That's clearly overpowered for the current price. The new Stugs have been doing great against infantry thanks to their buff and range. If T3 is to be skipped, Su-85 can be used with Advanced Warfare (1 x T-34) or Lend Lease (Sherman) commanders. In: Lobby
Thread: Congratulations on Victory Day 9 May 2014, 14:32 PM I've been to the Soviet war memorial in Berlin. I don't think that the Germans in general are 'pissed off about' it; they invaded the USSR and they were the one who killed 17 million soviet civilians and terrorized europe...The German cultural attitude towards WW2 is one of apology of crimes of their fathers, really. In: Lobby
Thread: Honest opinions about Balance - Soviet adv9 May 2014, 14:22 PM I still find the T-70 and the Puma to be not really worth it even though they have their advantages. They are priced too close to the medium armor and neither one adds enough value. I would get a Stug III G instead of puma most of the time. I'm thinking around 50 and 60 fuel for each would make them worthwhile. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Land Lease commander and fuel transfer ability8 May 2014, 05:21 AM I think it's a great ability as you can drop it anywhere. The LW ability requires that you drop it over a fuel point. It is, however, vulnerable to AA. The LL commanders is one of the top 3 Soviet commanders due to this and the Sherman IMO. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Honest opinions about Balance - Soviet adv7 May 2014, 19:39 PM Pretty much I believe that the Soviets have better infantry but are equal to the Germans in armor for the most part. Tiger tank is what shifts the balance. It is the German OP unit and the most OP & useful unit in the game, so I think tiger commanders are now the best way for German players to get ahead. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Honest opinions about Balance - Soviet adv6 May 2014, 06:01 AM ^ Yeah, for this particular match, that's I what I think. This was labeled 'Monday Novice' by the caster. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Honest opinions about Balance - Soviet adv6 May 2014, 04:39 AM I saw the tank fighting parts of this game and I got to say that the German duo played worse. They lost a bunch of tanks to obvious mistakes (stugs and panzer IVs) and bought the wrong tank park. -The stugs were a waste of fuel since they were throwing them against tanks. -The 2 Tigers at the end were correct but spamming stugs and p4's against all those IS-2s, T-34/85s, T-34/76s guaranteed that they would be outclassed. The paks were not enough to change the balance. They should have gone tiger or panther as soon as they saw the IS-2s appearing. Jump back to quoted post5 May 2014, 18:41 PMOZtheWiZARD Here is a great example of "pRO" German play. The best part is that at the end they complained how OP Russians tanks are. What is ironic however they managed to get 2 Tigers despite loosing basically for the whole game. That's all right but Soviets had one quite serious mistake that costed them majority of their armour. If anything this game shows how good the Tiger is after recent changes. I would really like to hear some honest opinions regarding this video. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviets still have no infantry based AT6 May 2014, 01:52 AM Instead of the Soviets getting RPGs, I'd prefer if the anti-tank guns were lower in pop cap, build time, and maybe even cost. eg. Zis-3: 6 pop, 280 MP, built time 50% In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ISU-1524 May 2014, 16:57 PM Yes, probably. The Germans were planning on staying there until spring of 1943. The wildcard here is the 1 million man Soviet assault force that was used for Uranus. Instead of deploying this against Army Group B alone, it would have to fight and attempt to encircle and annihilate parts of both A and B. The battle would drag on well into 43. I could see the entire soviet itinerary up to march 1943 being largely focused on an annihilation battle against AG A/B. There would be no operations Gallop and Star. Jump back to quoted post4 May 2014, 14:40 PMBurts The assault on Caucasus itself was also a horrible mistake. Had hitler not split up his forces he probaly could of taken Stalingrad. In: COH2 Balance