Profile of coh2player

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1571

General Information


Thread: You will always want T314 May 2014, 18:36 PM You do realize that the T-34 had a major buff, and compares favorably to the Panzer IV now? It doesn't shoot as fast but it's incrementally cheaper and has now has front armor that bounces the P4/Stug III G. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: You will always want T314 May 2014, 16:40 PM The problem is the fact that the Tiger is usually not alone, and there will be grens/shrecks & maybe a pak around. Swarming a Tiger generally means that your tanks need to be able to absorb some fire while they're in flank range. I do like using the T-34 horde though, but the Sherman's cost and low HP make it not worth it in my experience. Just using tanks alone is a riskier way than making a general push with combined arms. I much prefer if the Tiger attacks first, and then I hit it with a counterstroke (t-34s/shermans, infantry, Zis). Jump back to quoted post14 May 2014, 15:15 PMBrick Top 3 shermans easily kill a tiger. 2 T34/85s with mark target deal with it fine. Manoeuvrable armour is my favoured way to tackle a tiger. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: You will always want T314 May 2014, 14:12 PM ^ Tigers are less vulnerable to AT nades these days. Tiger is the most OP unit the Germans have and make up for their disadvantages elsewhere. I find double Shermans unsafe to use against a Tiger. They have good pen but their HP is too low for them to last very long. I think it's still necessary to ambush Tigers with combined arms (zis, infantry, armor) In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: You will always want T314 May 2014, 02:48 AM Post patch, I always go T3 for both Germans and Soviets as well. Then I get a Tiger for Germans and then either T-34/85 or Sherman. The IS-2 isn't worth it anymore IMO. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Maps, which one you like and why?13 May 2014, 20:43 PM I'm OK with most of the maps. The maps that I don't like are the ones with lots of chokepoints and bridges. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: This patch killed Katyusha and Werfer13 May 2014, 18:23 PM The Rocket trucks are better in 2 v 2 to 4 v 4 than 1 v 1. I don't think that rocket trucks are worth building in short 1 v 1 matches. There aren't that many clumped up units. Only one should be built at any time IMO. When they connect, the payoff can be huge. I find them effective when the opposition is distracted with something else, and they leave a bunch of units idle and clumped up. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What's the American massively long range tank going to be?13 May 2014, 15:35 PM Jump back to quoted post13 May 2014, 14:42 PMvan Voort They will probably have much, much, much better airpower call ins... VCOH disappointed in that area as the Airborne doctrine didn't offer all that much and the Infantry/Armor doctrine had none at all. I'm hoping for the B-17/B-24 massed bombing wing strike... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What's the American massively long range tank going to be?13 May 2014, 05:04 AM M12 155mm SP It was used to blast buildings and other fortifications with direct fire. they were used in the battle of Aachen as well. This could be a 'paper armor' version of the ISU-152. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Will Steve Blum return for Western Front Armies?13 May 2014, 00:08 AM The German commander voice is actually a pretty famous typecasted actor. He played lots of german soldiers. He was the main Nazi commander in Raiders of the Lost Arc. We are not worthy! In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Western Armies - Tiers and Units?12 May 2014, 18:37 PM Come to think of it, the Puma's stats would be close to a possible Hellcat. It would probably perform at around the same level and be used with the same type of 'paper armor' hit and run tactics. The puma is small, fast and seems to have good visual. It has 50 range. It has a ridiculous 160 pen but only 120 damage. Its HP is lower than tanks but close to the Stug III. In: Lobby