Profile of Serrith

Jump back to quoted post7 Nov 2019, 15:50 PMachpawel

It must have been like a firefly before then. For its price either it should have more penetration (which I feel is a must against churchills and other heavies) or a better rate of fire (but this would affect mediums too much imo)

Jump back to quoted post7 Nov 2019, 12:37 PMKatitof

They do both.
Whine about it all the time and ignore it even in situations when its clearly superior option.

Jump back to quoted post7 Nov 2019, 09:01 AMKatitof

3rd option, absolutely nothing will change and it'll just arrive a bit later, just like wehraboos completely ignore their intermediate AT vehicles and tunnelvision on panther, having raging wehraboos back to forums, crying their eyes out.

Jump back to quoted post6 Nov 2019, 17:15 PMdistrofio

Sure, both words (efficient, effective) seem pretty similar but they are not. Both are aimed towards a process and its results.

Effectivity is how well a job is done. If we are talking about a shooting range, a sniper rifle will almost always hit where you aim, also as dead center as possible.

Efficiency is how certain you are from getting the job done, also with the less amount of effort. I.e. A shotgun if we keep on the previous example. A single pellet hitting the target should do.

A cost-efficient unit is one that mostly trades resources, you might loose a tank in a 2v1 but both tanks you had were less expensive than the other one you were facing.

A Cost-effective unit is one that ensures you the job done, a sniper killing models is one of the best examples. Since the game has flanks, FoW and complex cover mechanics, units are indeed more or less effective at specific tasks. (AI/AT/preservation/mobility)

Jump back to quoted post7 Nov 2019, 00:06 AMCODGUY

In summary:

The same clique of Axis mains want the Jackson nerfed. The same people that got the Churchill nerfed and if they get the Jackson nerfed the Pershing is next and then maybe the dozer Shermans. Mark my words this is what will happen.

Jump back to quoted post6 Nov 2019, 13:37 PMdistrofio

But you'd be wrong because some factions are designed to have good/bad cost-efficient units. Its mostly because the other units in the same faction that sinergises or counterweighs such units.

OKW and USF have cost effective but not efficient units. SU has some good cost efficient ones. OST is in the middle, so does UKF