Profile of Crecer13

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2

General Information


Thread: Feb 17th Stream Summary18 Feb 2016, 04:12 AM Maxim - fine, if someone build 6 Maxim is because: - Penal and conscripts suck - Unsportsmanlike conduct In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Land Matress Commander12 Feb 2016, 15:58 PM I do not see the point to give a flamethrower royal engineers. The British have universal carrier with a flamethrower, which will be more effective. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 6-Men crew for SU support units doesn't make sense.12 Feb 2016, 07:19 AM 6 people does not mean better. a simple example: the Soviet mortar against the German (6 vs 4) if they start shooting at each other at the same time, in most cases, German win often using mortar In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Land Matress Commander11 Feb 2016, 04:12 AM royal engineers with a flamethrower? hmm.. in bundle includes a kangaroo Churchill? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Beef's Beef: Soviet Infantry Woes7 Feb 2016, 20:08 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Feb 2016, 19:05 PMAustralian Magic You all try to change penals while their only problem is durability which can be fixed by adjusting vet. And Penals dont overlap with engis or shocks. Engis cannot be your mainline and they are useless without flamers. Penals are very potent. Try to put them in M3 and flank even 2 volks squads. They will melt them. Again, their only problem is lack of good rec acc bonus. If they need anyother buff its slight increase of long range. I use them all the time on Urban maps. Triple penals strat melt everything on such maps. Only late game is problematic cause of rec acc Penal very potent? You are funny. Most of the players who have long played by the Soviet will take the shock troops. Penal is the way to defeat, it is very bad. Because the majority of Soviet commanders are not used. I agree to remove penal flamethrower and make them ranged combat unit. Replacing ability In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviets dealing with heavy late german armor30 Jan 2016, 19:40 PM Now Soviet difficult to destroy German tanks alone. To compensate worst tanks (from all factions), you need a British ally (Tactical Support Regiment) with super Anti Tank Artillery. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Should T-34/85 be non doctrinal?29 Jan 2016, 13:48 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Jan 2016, 10:17 AMNuclear Arbitor no because i'd rather see the 34/76 buffed and the 34/85 remain more powerful than the IV in order to give USSR variety. the soviets already have enough weak/average units without losing their good ones. why do you compare T-34-85 with Pz4? T-34-85 must be compared with Easy Eight, Comet and Panther. And it is the worst among them In: COH2 Balance
Thread: WW2 Daily Pic25 Jan 2016, 19:13 PM BM-13 "Katyusha" preparing to volley In: The Library
Thread: WW2 Daily Pic25 Jan 2016, 19:09 PM 25 January 1943, Soviet troops liberated Voronezh In: The Library
Thread: My Idea for Soviet Redesign25 Jan 2016, 18:58 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Jan 2016, 18:47 PMKatitof You do realize that flamer was directly attached to its 45mm? It was physically impossible to use flamer and a gun, because they use the SAME barrel. Flamethrower is mounted in place of the coaxial machine gun, so he could well do it at the same time In: COH2 Balance