Profile of Brick Top

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1162

General Information


Thread: The direction of balance. 9 Aug 2020, 08:49 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Aug 2020, 08:39 AMachpawel Just make ram damage dealer That's quite a good idea +1. Could be absolutely lethal still, but it's going to require more combined arms effort than simply click ram from a flank then click bomb drop. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The direction of balance. 8 Aug 2020, 20:50 PM The main consideration picking a commander should not be what you want to do, but rather what is your opponent doing. It ma In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The direction of balance. 8 Aug 2020, 08:31 AM I disagree that everything should be fully hard counterable without doctrines. After all the game is designed that loads of stuff is OP when used correctly in the correct circumstances. If everything is counterable stock, that frees people to brainlessly pick whatever is the most OP commander. When you pick a commander, you can help to force enemy to need to try counter what you are doing, often with their commander choice, this is an important mechanic which adds loads of depth of thinking and strats. Its how the vanilla game was designed with Ost / Soviet... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tips on using VSL Commander in 2v2.8 Aug 2020, 08:17 AM Not really been using this commander, obviously its meta for the huge boost to survivability on gren squads. Any little tips are tricks for getting the most out of the doctrine? In: Ostheer Strategies
Thread: Close comback 2v2 in Minsk8 Aug 2020, 07:54 AM Was pretty comfortable for the allies. Was waiting for axis comeback, didnt happen. Axis probably built too many panthers. Werfer was mostly aimed badly. Axis didnt even scrape 100k damage combined, OKW almost had double losses:kills. In: Replays
Thread: All out war8 Aug 2020, 06:57 AM Can I ask why you chose to open 3 gren, then MG? Was it because you expected an M3? In: Replays
Thread: Rifle grenade=dodge BUT allied grenade=MP bleed4 Aug 2020, 14:38 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Aug 2020, 11:31 AMHannibal Fuel wise all factions are pretty much the same, MP wise they differ but not by too much. Compared vs USA, Ost has to waste time building structures, and USA gets 'free' units as part of the tech up. All Im trying to say is the factions are totally different and just because one gets free nade/snare as part of building their T1 building, doesnt mean others should (they get other bonuses instead). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Rifle grenade=dodge BUT allied grenade=MP bleed4 Aug 2020, 07:57 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Aug 2020, 03:42 AMCODGUY Ugh no... have to waste fuel and MP just to unlock the damn thing it's a joke. LOL. Ost has to pay more for tech and buildings. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: best 2 vs 2 I've plaied22 Jul 2020, 09:50 AM tmass ended with 1900 manpower, 1500 munis and 900 fuel. It didnt need to be that close. Also the 2 mortar pits spent the entire match mostly undefended, wouldnt have been hard to push them with the shreks. In: Replays
Thread: AEC and Bofors Tech.17 Jul 2020, 07:01 AM The AEC with its stun shot and the sniper with its vehicle crit were supposed to be Brits versions of snare. Sappers were given snare to slightly level the playing field with other factions snares. So I don't see why AEC needs to have such a powerful stun ability. If it was modified or changed to another ability, that would solve it being so incredibly good Vs medium and heavy armour. In: COH2 Balance