Profile of elchino7

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198076231535


Thread: Buff Ostwind16 Nov 2018, 16:00 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Nov 2018, 15:08 PMGrumpy I don't think it would be broken, but also think that what it really needs is to have the AA ability improved. At Vet 0, it seems almost worthless for AA. At Vet 3, it sometimes shoots down planes in a their first pass. I've watched it in comp stomps and seen it not fire at planes or unable to rotate the turret fast enough to fire at planes. Maybe just moving some or all of the rotation bonus from Vet 3 to Vet 0 would make this okay. That said, it is interesting how this thread has so many replies yet there isn't any similar thread about the USF AA halftrack. To put it in comparison, for 30 more mp than the Ostwind, you can purchase a USF AA halftrack that has 1/2 as much health, 1/7 as much armor, and moves slower (at least in game - IRL the M15 was almost twice as fast). Even at that, people complained when the USF halftrack had a 360 degree firing arc so now the main armament only fires to the rear. I might not have mentioned it on this thread, but ALL DEDICATED AA units should reliable kill airplanes due to how they work right now. Quad, AA/Flak HT, Ostwind, Centaur, Bofor/Flak Emplacement (not HQ-not base bunker), should have similar performance. I think that anything done to the Ostwind should be on top of having their AA buff to match other similar units. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: about small arm and relative positioning. 16 Nov 2018, 15:52 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Nov 2018, 08:46 AMVipper So yes it is not a simple change that is true and in my opinion things where close into finding that balance for mainline infantry at least in the September 9th patch so "changing" that balance by introducing high lethality units like ST and Penal before minute 1 in the game was a step in the wrong direction. That's looking at the past with rose tinted glass or at least expecting what the patchnote says to hold true when the game is later played. There's intention and there's execution. If there was "balance" across mainline infantry: SU: wouldn't had to keep relying on cheese. T1 was either sniper spam or clowncar. T2 was maxim spam. Penals saw no use, Guards replaced any unit lost during the mid/late game and Shocks saw use due to P2 tech meme placement and KV8. OH: wouldn't had to later receive a hefty initial manpower increase and getting an MG42 at T0 nor having their Pios buffed. There's also the issue of how USF > OH in most games. IIRC this is prior to also sniper buff, 222 buffs. Can't remember how Osstruppen played at that time but i'm mostly sure that Stug-e stall into Tiger was common. And probably CAS grenadier LMG spam. USF: aka end the game before it drags for too long. Spam Elite Rifles, M20 into HE sherman. Not sure at which point RET transformed in main line infantry. Could be patches later. OKW: Volk shreck blob, Kubeljesus, SwS truck push. Most if not all call in infantry which replaced Volks. Not even worth mentioning anything else cause the faction later required a complete overhaul. The difference in balance between each faction, 1v1 vs teamgames and pro/top vs decent/low was on one of the worst states of the whole game. In: Lobby
Thread: EA will remaster the first two 'Command & Conquer'15 Nov 2018, 18:18 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Nov 2018, 08:23 AMKatitof Anyone else sees it as a bad news? It means they are unwilling to create new entry that people would actually want and instead go for easy, low budget solution which equals to throwing meat scraps at a bunch of angry dogs in hopes they won't tear them apart. Also, both of these already are "remastered" with modern QoL solutions and improved balance in OpenRA project. Well, this is the best result you could expect coming from EA. Reminder that their ideas for the IP was basically relegating it to a mobile game after the disastrous final releases of the game and the cancellation of the last project. In: Other Games
Thread: Is2 and other heavy tanks issu13 Nov 2018, 22:24 PM Another random thought: would buffing the HP of 1040 heavy tanks to 1060 HP be too much ? This would put it outside of range of 160 dmg + snare. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Buff Ostwind13 Nov 2018, 22:20 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Nov 2018, 22:09 PMVipper That information is incorrect according to Cruzz the Vicker has more dps than hmg-42 at almost all ranges. And that range is only 1 For what it matters, the damage is similar besides 0-10 range, which almost no infantry squad manages to get into range. Random thought. Would Ostwind with MG suppression be broken ? Talking about 1/2 bulletins level of suppression. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: I haven't seen a Soviet AT gun in at least six months.13 Nov 2018, 22:08 PM Target type infantry Accuracy multi 1 Damage multi 1.928571 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: I haven't seen a Soviet AT gun in at least six months.13 Nov 2018, 15:33 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Nov 2018, 14:03 PMullumulu I cant see where the buff is when guards could only get 2 ptrs OR 2 dps instead 2 ptrs AND 2 dps? To put it simple, imagine a 6 man gren squad with LMG. PTRS are there to hinder the squad. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: I haven't seen a Soviet AT gun in at least six months.13 Nov 2018, 13:53 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Nov 2018, 12:20 PMullumulu can someone tell my why guards have 4 weapon slots (2ptrs + 2 dps)? while mostly every other infantery has only 2? let them get only 2 weapons. choose one: AI or AT or a mixed 1 ptrs + 1dps That moment when Ullumulu suggest a heavy OP buff to soviets. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 120mm Mortars Are too relaint on RNG11 Nov 2018, 16:41 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Nov 2018, 11:03 AMMichalszym Thanks but I have phrased my problem in the wrong way. I don't know where I can find my replays, and thus can't upload them. C:User\xxx\Documents\MyGames\company of heroes 2\playback Last replay is always saved as temp.rec if you don't specifically saved the file with another name. Alternative just search for temp.rec file or playback folder. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch10 Nov 2018, 18:37 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Nov 2018, 19:59 PMSully I'd say it should mirror how the Brit emplacements are setup for consistency. Small arms fire does some damage, but not a lot due to armor penetration values. Armor on UKF emplacement is not high (5). It's offset by having double HP but having a huge hitbox meaning that anything can kill it, even the same units it should counter. A better solution would be making the gun not destroyed until the crew dies (not sure if that would make it OP). In: Lobby