Profile of zarok47

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 587

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/Zarok47
Steam: 76561198007472278


Thread: 22224 Apr 2018, 07:45 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Apr 2018, 18:56 PMferwiner Do you build an AT gun to counter a single M3, UC or dodge? You don't, becouse these are cheap units and it is not worth it. In the same way you shouldn't be forced to go AT gun to counter a single 222. Never played okw have you? Jump back to quoted post24 Apr 2018, 06:02 AMEsxile And how do you get that if you went USF T1 first? Can you remember us why you like to pick Airborn doctrine in the first place. Literally every unit in lt tier can counter 222... Jump back to quoted post23 Apr 2018, 01:39 AM#12345678 No more buff on 222 please. I don't want to recall last year, when you have to fight double or triple 222 rush in the field because of the ridiculous low fuel cost of it (15 fuel). Do you even read the patchnotes? Jump back to quoted post23 Apr 2018, 19:52 PMClassyDavid it forces Allies to go AT weapons just like against OKW or Axis against any Allied faction. Exactly, but people just kneejerk against 222 buff because it was once OP. (yet forget every other LV was gamebreaking at one point). God forbid ostheer has a usefull LV. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 22222 Apr 2018, 14:42 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Apr 2018, 14:10 PMferwiner Are you really not trolling? With similar support trading one 222 for aaht or aec is pretty much certain if you have 2. Works for me every time I go 222s, even though I usually prefer long T1 play with sniper. T70 is of course a different case as it comes the latest of all these vehicles. Which doesn't matter that much becouse nobody sane goes 222s versus soviets either way. You just answered why the 222 should be buffed. I refrain from the rest since it's personal experience and some weird argument about timing with the t70, which will just devolve into semantics. In any case, im done so have a nice day. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 22222 Apr 2018, 14:01 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Apr 2018, 11:39 AMblvckdream Double 222 is complete cancer and super annoying. Why would anyone want this back in the game? Almost everybody seems to agree on that. ??? I answered your question, why are you responding like this? You seem to be argueing out of emotion against the 222 buff, I recommend you evaluate yourself. Jump back to quoted post22 Apr 2018, 12:13 PMferwiner Is it not a problem on its own? 222 comes before 2 out of 3 allied factions can get to an AT gun. It is also much cheaper than AT gun itself. Not to mention that even now double 222 is a valid counter to AEC while costing less than AEC and its research. So? It's not like 222 is going to wipe infantry like a t70 (which by your logic, is also cheaper than an ATG) or that allied factions lack AT options (mines,snares,LV's you name it). And I know most brit players are basicly AFK, but 444 isn't a threat to a AEC in competent hands. The people argueing against 222 buff should play ostheer and face t70/aaht/aec and come back. You will realise that this thread is a joke then. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 22222 Apr 2018, 11:28 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Apr 2018, 08:54 AMKatitof The actual controversy here is cost reduction and 50% armor buff. The armor buff is so you need actual AT to fight the 222, not just laugh at it with infantry, forcing eternal repairs. The mp buff is so it can be bought in pairs without further crippling ostheer mp. What is the problem? Jump back to quoted post22 Apr 2018, 09:05 AMblvckdream It´s kind of rediculous that M20 will remain at 320 MP while 222 will cost 200MP...How is that fair? You never heard of the free LT hitting at the same time, creating a gigantic shock when lt+m20 hits? Thank free sqauds for artificial overpricing of USF units. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 22222 Apr 2018, 08:39 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Apr 2018, 08:23 AMKatitof Years ago, when it had 200 hp and much weaker weapons. 250 is perfectly reasonable for what you get, compared to M20, which costs 320 and can't engage literally all targets. 200 is reasonable since Ostheer is manpower strained and you need 2 222's to fight other LV's. The limiting factor is fuel, 60 fuel isn't cheap and 90 fuel is of the charts for what you get. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Hearts of Iron IV21 Apr 2018, 17:52 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Apr 2018, 16:23 PMblvckdream Might try it again if AI is better now. The game was always pretty good but playing vs retarded AI is just too annoying after a while. So we organise a coh2 muliplayer party. I call Soviets. In: Other Games
Thread: 22221 Apr 2018, 07:29 AM Just do what ostheer does when facing an LV: Build AT. And all your problems will go away. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Performance and cost efficiency of massed SU76s vs SU8530 Mar 2018, 08:45 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Mar 2018, 08:30 AMKatitof As much as I am aware of it, I am also aware that these balance spectrum is always ignored for the extremes. I do not have complete and blind faith in modders as they too have proven to go to extremes at times and with how long it takes between patches, I'd rather be safe then sorry. You think this thread has that impact? Never took you for an optimist. Regardless, I prefer not to take into account what might and might not happen. It only muddle's the water. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Performance and cost efficiency of massed SU76s vs SU8530 Mar 2018, 08:00 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2018, 16:06 PMKatitof Well, we all know how popular the unit was when it couldn't stand up to weakest med armor. It was a meme unit before. There is a ocean of balance between hardcountering med armor and not standing up to it. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Performance and cost efficiency of massed SU76s vs SU8528 Mar 2018, 14:43 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2018, 14:25 PMaerafield The current SU76 is definitely OP and can't stay as it is, but the nerfing process of this unit must be done very carefully. No "numerous nerfs without any compensate" like we saw with the Panther last patch for example. The reason is simple: SU76 needs to stay a super hardcounter against axis medium tanks (p4, ostwind, stug) or otherwise you can't skip t2 as soviet anymore cuz t4 comes too late (additionally, you can't just rely on ZiS guns as your whole midgame AT if the map is too big). And that would lower the soviet utility drastically and cause linear play with less gaming experience. Add a cost to the barrage (10 or 15 mun) or remove it completely and lower the far penetration for example, and let's see if any additional adjustments will be needed after. Uhh, sov t2 is only 160 mp and 20 fuel, it's not expensive to get a atg to support your mediums (as every other faction has to do). So su-76 doesnt need to hardcounter p4 (apart from the above, it is super bad design to have such a cheap unit nullify axis midgame). In: COH2 Gameplay