Profile of SmokazCOH

how can a term like "abuse of range" even exist?

you're basically making the same complaint that was made about the m8. that shreks can't chase it down. that it can harass the axis inf in the open. duuh, it's it's role. price considerations aside, it's not abuse of range or "molesting shrek fire cycle" (strange words to use about this situation)

functions of the shrek is being declared that it doesn't have, how about looking at waht the unit actually can do and how it's statted before deciding that the t70 is supposed to fuck off vs shreks ?

t70 is great vs units in the open, horrendous vs cover. so you have to give up some map control to reduce its effiency. shreks are great vs t34s and su85 because things like: a miss from the t34 main gun can allow them to charge from first salvo to get of the 2nd while ignoring a lot of small arms around them.

you can't complain about the investment of a secondary at source like a shrek to support your pak when the whole point of the two investments is that they multiply eacjh others strengths. the AT defense you are supposed to have out t1/t2 is faust + pak or shreks + pak

on their own they are weak, together they are strong

buffing the shrek to have a lower aim time is not a nerf of the t70, its a net effecting buffing/nerfing p.shreks vs all tanks

why "rape" the entire shreks vs tanks to nerf it vs t70

given that panzershrek squads aren't matched by anything on the soviet side, i think we should look at what they actually were designed to do by stats, not by wishful thinking

shreks on their own were a poor coutner to light vehicles in coh 1, this is a carry over.

Maybe it's just too harsh. The conversion could be made less pronounced, less manpower drain and less fuel gained and then put in some kind of OTHER thing than repair stations for industry players to use munitions on.

GASP what about GASP!!!! an ability to convert munitions into fuel ??? omg ???? can it be ??

I don't understand why these MGs should be better than Maxims, when they don't even require a tech investment as the Maxim does. It both pins and damages more than Maxim or MG42.

IMO this commander completely removes any reason to ever build T2, as it has both the best MG and mortar in the game.

this commander turns the game on its head and makes the soviets much more flexible early-game, maybe too much.

1. price , why are shocks better than panzergrens? price

2. its intended to do exactly that (remove need for t2, give flexible early game)

3. the tradeoff is no elite inf, no decent offmaps, no impressive lategame

4. the at gun it gives need outside buffs (like fhq) or vet 3 to be able to fight off p4s and up

guys, when you click on upload after filling in the replay form and the title/text, the whole thing just refreshes and goes blank after the browser lists the upload as complete

Have you tried doing this?

http://www.hdwallpapersinn.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Animal-Picture-Mother-Tiger-Licking-Cub-HD-Wallpaper.jpg

Btw, rageposts post game is considered improper