Profile of panzerjager2

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 168

General Information


Thread: New Commanders / Units discussion 25 Sep 2013, 08:22 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Sep 2013, 08:06 AMOmega_Warrior No, not at all. The KV-1 doesn't have much killing power. Also note that it comes out at CP4, a while after most medium armor is on the field. It is very vulnerable to AT guns, and Panthers and Tigers eat it for dinner. It has as much impact as a P4 so I think it is good where it is. Thanks , I assumed it was coming out at CP3. CP4 is a late enough time frame. As for some other stuff: For the motherland: used it against Pgrens, 2 grens, and an MG with only 3 conscripts and took them handedly, just don't plan to do anything fast once it's done( seriously, they come to a crawl). B-4 Howitzer: Almost useless once you built. Takes forever to do anything and can't aim for shit, but get one vet and it becomes a titan. Just point click and goodbye heavy tanks. Took out a Tiger and a Elephant in the same game. Ostruppen: Useless. If you think that you are going to build an army out of these, think again. Conscripts can just walk around them like they are nothing. Use them to cap and be overall fodder. Can be used to delay your opponent quite well though. I haven't used forward bunker yet though, that seems like it could be a little OP in some cases. have you tried out the assault grens , 250 ht with pgrens and the stug ausf e yet ? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why are T-34 so flowery?25 Sep 2013, 08:13 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Sep 2013, 08:05 AMAbdul You are so obsessed with soviet fan boys, you mention me in almost every comment you make. I guess I am the direct adversaries of german fan boys. Regarding the t34, it will not be better than the panzer 4 if relic increases the penetration to 100 for example. It still has less damage and less armor. That would just make t34 round bounce a little less than half the time against panzer 4 front armor and panther back armor. There ... I acknowledged your neutrality Back to topic. Buffing T34 any more than it already is will make this unit back to the op state it was in the beta. Panzer 4 has already been nerfed pretty hard on the AI role while the t34 has been buffed to a very acceptable level for its cost. Beyond the soviet fanboys like our friend above (who will never be satisfied till Germans are completely removed from the game), the t34 does not need any more changes and I think relic agrees with that. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Math question concerning bulletins. 25 Sep 2013, 08:02 AM From my logic and experience I would say the 4% accuracy/reload is a better option since the increased damage over time from having more accuracy or a faster reload will allow you to vet up more or less the same time as the 10% exp while at the same time allowing you to keep the accuracy/reload modifiers even after vetting up. for example the panzer grens pre patch 5% accuracy bonus was a better option vs the 9% vet increase since panzergrens with shreks vet up extremely fast anyway without the exp bulletin and once you vet up the accuracy upgrade along with the vetted unit pays much better dividends in the long run. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: about the new bulletins need some recommendation 25 Sep 2013, 07:48 AM i really do not understand why they made the bulletins even more useless... I was hoping in fact they would make the bulletins more noticeable instead they have gone all out and made them completely irrelevant. Might as well remove them from the game. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: New Commanders / Units discussion 25 Sep 2013, 07:46 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Sep 2013, 07:13 AMNullist Abdul, whats your ladder page? Abdul wont reveal it ... he plays only soviets which would explain the forum posts. Now back on topic, does anyone not think that the new KV1 for its super cheap cost is a tad op In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Tiger needs a buff25 Sep 2013, 07:37 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Sep 2013, 06:56 AMAbdul That's very ignorant to say in many ways, but focusing on the issue the IS2 can't beat the Tiger. In fact 1 on 1 often tiger will win the fight with 30-40% health left, that's good for the tiger. IS2 can 1 shot entire german squads ... a tiger will take 2 minutes to kill a conscript squad. The IS2 is a far far better anti inf tank and its AT capability is almost on par with the tiger and its armor is superior too (many a time tiger's shots are deflected) The issue here in this thread is not the IS2 which is now balanced but the fact that the tiger has the same range as a panzer 4 and just slightly better at anti infantry. The majority of neutral players agree that the tiger needs a small buff in the anti infantry and range department. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why are T-34 so flowery?25 Sep 2013, 07:29 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Sep 2013, 07:06 AMAbdul I think the t34 is good now, except for one problem, it bounces allot of shots against medium armor. If I recon the patch increased the damage from 80 to 120 and the penetration from 75 to 80. So they increased damage, but hardly touched penetration. sure not forgetting the fact its 30 fuel cheaper than the panzer 4. Soviet fanboys would love to make it as good as a Panzer 4 while being cheaper. But fortunately there are players who play both sides .... its cheaper for a reason .... its NOT meant to take on a more expensive panzer 4 headon 1 v 1. Its fantastic against infantry and can maul any light vehicles. As for panzer 4 ram still works. Its stupid to expect a t3 unit to do well against a t4 unit like the panther. For its price its perfect. Contrast this to the useless StuG or brummbar In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why are T-34 so flowery?25 Sep 2013, 06:14 AM the OP expects a tank which costs just 95 fuel to take on tigers while at the same time massacring infantry (which it does too well in fact) Soviet whiner alert .... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: New Commanders / Units discussion 25 Sep 2013, 06:00 AM ruskies get more op units like cheap KV1 (120 fuel/440 mp wtf????) , forward hq , 203mm howitzer which now can arty your own base while Germans get ... an even worse stug3 , ostruppen cannon fodder. Where is the king tiger ??? (knowing relic's history of hatred with the tiger probably they will make it cost 1500 mp and 1000 fuel and have range of 30 with su85 being able to kill it in 4 shots) In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Tiger needs a buff25 Sep 2013, 05:54 AM Abdul as usual with his pro soviet blinkers on forgets that IS2 got a massive buff unlike the tiger which actually got nerfed. Tiger needs to have its range at least equal to panther and slightly better AI. Its ridiculous to watch a conscript squad charging up to a tiger knowing the tiger can shoot at it for >2 mins without retreating. In: COH2 Gameplay